Quiz 1 Flashcards
2 views on the role of financial markets and middle ground
- Finance is evil. Wall st people get away with things and take advantage of poor Main Street people or don’t add value. Shuffle pieces around but don’t add value (shell game - like Wells Fargo). Experts claim to have special skills but they don’t.
- Free markets are best for all. Markets add value by transferring risk and providing services. Prices reflect all information efficiently without any frictions or transaction costs. Any regulation of credit default swaps is counterproductive.
Free markets are good, don’t get in the way and intervene. Regulation is counterproductive.
Middle ground: markets help in efficiently bringing borrowers and lenders together - but there are imperfections. Devil in the details. Investigate in this course.
Clearing price
Is there always a clearing price?
Clearing price is the equilibrium price that people pay for a good.
Ex: water on a hot day, certain price everyone would pay.
But imagine there’s a chance that there is a poison in it. Then clearing price goes down (presumably to 0)
Minsky Financial instability hypothesis
Long prosperity breeds crisis.
Relationship between financing and growth isn’t linear.
Cycle of good to bad to good
1. Starts with a conservative risk hedging
2. Then ambitious investment
3. Finally irrational exuberance and excess risk taking.
Minsky moment when the market collapses.
Improvement, confidence, prosperity, excitement, convulsion, stagnation.
Capital markets today
Since 2008, financial system undergone largest financial market overhaul since Depression (late 20s, early 30s)
Market participants, regulators, and academics still learning how the dynamics of new normal work. Much thru trial and error
Some hot topics of debate:
How long can an expansion last, how is the market environment fundamentally different than free crisis, and is post-crisis regulation achieving its aims in making the system safer?
- How long can an expansion last?
- How is the market environment fundamentally different than pre crisis
- Is post crisis regulation achieving its aims in making the system safer?
- Expansions don’t die of old age. Not an explicit number of years until a recession. But, old people more likely to die, so longer in expansion, more likely for a recession.
- What are new transmission mechanisms? What will propagate shocks?
- Or, are there newly hidden risks? Where did the risk go, and what does it look like?
David Bowie example
Looking at how market innovation, issuer, investor, and policy all interact on the sides around the asset class.
Bowie wants cash now, so he sells securities backed by present and future royalty payments on pre-1990 albums.
David Pullman, wharton alumnus, makes a market innovation.
Bowie is the issuer - he does this bc he wants cash now.
Asset class: esoteric asset backed securities (ABS)
Prudential is the investor and pays $55M for 10 years.
Policy: IP or credit ratings policy could affect demand and thus price.
Market dynamics:
Bonds bought by prudential in 1997. Pre downloadable music era. Rated investment grade
Prudential sells them in 2003 and downgraded to junk bonds in 04
But paid off in full by maturity in 07
Banks as intermediaries overview
People: earn income, spend on goods and services
Firms: pay employees to produce
People have different preferences. Young people and innovators like to spend more than comes in, borrowing from banks allows this. And older people like to save for later and have less of a risk appetite. Pay those with more risk to take the risk away from them
Defining features of banks are that they 1. Take deposits and 2. Make loans.
Firms interact with financial intermediation. They have corporate borrowing/saving.
And households interact w financial intermediation too and they have household borrowing and saving.
The firms and households interact as well, through household income and consumption.
Banks as intermediaries continued
- Facilitate the transfer of funds.
From net savers (prefer liquidity) to net borrowers (longer term investments) - Facilitate the transfer and spreading of risk
Diversification of idiosyncratic risk (invest in unrelated firms) and transfer from those more averse to risk to those less averse to risk. - Take advantage of economies of scale (buy an index)
Reduce cost per dollar transaction. Solve a search problem. - Help mitigate issues of asymmetric information.
Intermediaries are experts in their markets and so help filter info and assess risks.
Pre and post transaction risks:
Adverse selection: worst risks are more likely to want to transact (insurance)
Moral hazard: engaging in risky actions after transaction
Focusing on bank lending and money supply, key to banks roles as intermediaries, in today’s lecture.
Virtues of credit provision
Bank deposits in 1873 - 120M euros in London, 40M in New York, 13M in Paris, 8M in german empire.
Lot more cash outside of banks in France and Germany and non-banking countries than England, but not attainable.
Scattered more throughout the country and unable to put it together.
“Million in hands of a single banker is great power. But the same sum scattered in 10s and 50s through a whole nation is no power at all”
Banks as intermediaries: fractional research banking
Banks keep a fraction of deposits in reserve and lend out the rest.
Ex: assets: 10 coins kept in reserve, 90 coins lent out. Liabilities: 100 coins deposited. Say they earn 10% on loans and pay depositors 5%
Loan ratio (L): share of deposits lent out by banks. Here, it is 0.90, since 90 of the 100 deposited coins are re-lent. Affects the broad measure of money (more availability)
Reserve ratio (R): share of deposits held in reserve (May be a requirement to hold a certain amount). Is 10/100 = .1 here
Also note: total number of coins in the system is still 100. Money base stays the same.
And banks earn spread income.
Assuming no loan default, they earn: [(.190) + (010)] - .05*100 = 4 coins
This is 10% loan earning * 90 coins lend out + 0 percent on the 10 coins kept - the 5% paying the depositors on the 100 deposited coins.
Lending amount based on lending demand rather than requirement to keep certain reserve amount.
Money base vs broad money supply and how the different banks interact with one another.
Bank A starts with 1000 in deposits. Then loans out 800 and keeps 200. Bank B takes this 800 that A gives it and then has 800 in deposits. Then they loan out 640 and keep 160. Bank C then deposits the 640 and loans out 512 and keeps 128. Then Bank D deposits 512 and loans 410 and keeps 102. This continues indefinitely.
For example, a person buys a car, the car dealer deposits at bank B. And then someone buys shares at TradeWeb, then the banker deposits at bank C.
The loan ratio (L) is .8 here and reserve ratio (R) is .2
The money base (D1) is the total reserve supply in the system (also equals the initial deposit). So this is 1000 here
The broad money supply = D1 * (1+L + L squared + L cubed + …) = D1/ (1-L). And remember 1-L = R, so
Broad money supply = D1/R
Here, R is .2 and D1 is 1000, so broad money supply is 5000
This is the sum of the deposits so the total here is
4000 under loans, 1000 (money base) under reserves, and 5000 under deposits (broad money)
We do make one simplifying assumption: all funds lent out ultimately return to the banking system.
Effects of intermediation
Suppose there is money but no lending…
What is relationship between broad money and the money base - they would be the same. R is 1, so they’re equal.
How is money supply increased/decreased? Change reserve ratio, bigger/smaller initial deposit.
Lloyd blankfein described himself as just a banker doing God’s work.
Employs expertise, scale, and diversification to meet demand for financial intermediation and so reduces problems of asymmetric information.
Delegation can raise agency problems. Intermediary will ultimately act in own interest. Not something that we just realized post 2008, but Thomas Jefferson in 18th century said he believes banking is more dangerous to liberties than standing armies. Doesn’t trust bankers giving money for them to use in their interests.
Pro-cyclical nature of banking:
Hyman Minsky and macroprudential regulation
Minsky: expansion encourages lending and eventually reckless lending until a minsky moment occurs, which tips the economy into a recession
Macroprudential regulation aims to dampen cyclical forces. Focal point is bank safety - cut risk and leverage, increase liquidity.
Pro-cyclical nature of banking
How does bank lending affect money supply
Banks lend less, money supply down. Banks lend more, money supply up
Large expansions/contractions to broad money supply occur with small changes in:
1. Money base (narrow money)
2. Banks reserve or loan ratio
This makes sense given broad money supply = Money base (D1) / reserve ratio (R)
Depositor withdrawals to hoard currency is equivalent to a base money contraction.
US banking system in early to mid 1800s
- no central bank (no federal reserve)
—> bank notes issued by private state-chartered banks made over 1500 different currencies - relative rates: banks note discounts (% prices below face value) based on an indiviudal banks location, reputation (credit)m and the possibility the note is counterfeit
Face value is the stated value at issuance, to be received upon maturity
Market value is the price to buy/sell today
-overall level of borrowing/lending rates are determined by money supply and money demand
—> demand shocks include seasons, speculation, disasters, immigration
—> appetite to lend largely determines broad money supply
Crazy cyclical changes in the interest rates in the mid 1800s
How money supply and money demand determine market rate
Y axis is the nominal $ loan/borrow rate
X axis is the quantity
Upward sloping money supply, downward slope money demand.
Where they intersect is the market rate.
What happens to money supply/demand graph if the economy is booming? And then what happens as good times turn into bad times
If the economy is booming:
1. Banks lend out higher and higher fractions of their deposits
2. Proliferation of lending produces some poorly motivated investments
Upward sloping Money supply curve shifts to the right. Downward sloping money demand curve shifts to the right.
So, now there is a higher quantity at the EQ but it is the same market rate.
As good times turn into bad times and the minsky moment occurs:
- Banks cut back lending due to heighten sense of default risk on loans
- Deposits (funding sources) demand their deposits back due to heightened sense of bank default risk.
- Banks cut back lending more bc they have fewer deposits to lend.
So, money supply shifts up and left as less money out there due to less lending. But demand stays the same. So less quantity and higher marker rate.
Us banking panic of 1933
Perpetual tension aiming to dampen the pro-cyclical nature of banks. But need efficient credit intermediation
Us banking panic of 1933 - in the absence of banking service, some people reverted to barter.
“There was no money. There were no coins. We traded chickens and eggs in town for salt, sugar, baking powder, fatback”
Early attempts to centralize the banking system
1694: Bank of England established
1776: revolutionary war
1781: bank of North America, philly
1787: constitution signed. Hamilton favores central bank, Jefferson opposed it
1791: first bank, 120 south third st (philly)
1792: us mint founded. First us coins produced
1816: second bank (420 chestnut st)
Central banks introduced to control loan ratios and stabilize currency’s value. But, lack of coordination with state banks - all expanding at different rates. And notes depreciated after massive loans to Congress (most lending was to the govt)
Panic of 1907
Background:
- rumor of knickerbocker trust involvement in a failed cooper cornering scheme. Depositors withdrew $8M in 3 hr. By 2 pm, knickerbocker was insolvent
- Concerned with spillover, depositors withdrew money from NYC banks broadly. Hoarded cash (shoeboxes, coffee cans, mattresses)
- many banks collapsed. Loan rates rose to 70% and then to 90%. Banking system froze - no lending at any rate.
1907 panic produced political will to coordinate the monetary system
1908: congress formed a monetary commission
1910: published 15k page report of findings and recommendations
1913: federal reserve act established federal reserve system as central monetary authority. Federal reserve notes become main currency
Basic idea: manage intersection of money supply and money demand to dampen boom/bust cycles and risk of escalation. Steep learning curve.