Quiz 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Language used to motivate, inspire, inform, or persuade readers and/ or listeners; used in argument

A

Rhetoric

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Figures of speech and other literary devices used in rhetoric

A

Rhetorical Devices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

List Parts of an Argument and their meanings

A

Claim: your position
Support: data, references, facts, statistics
Warrant: connection between support + claim
Logic: how well was connection between claim + support
Think about the Audience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

List the 3 Types of Claims and their meanings

A

Fact: factual + data
Value: Judgement
Policy: Should or should nots

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

7List the 2 Types of Support

A

Factual: data and studies
Expert Opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

List the parts of Aristotle’s Rhetorical Triangle

A

Logos: Logic; the arguments you are making
Pathos: Empathy; the emotion you elicit from your audience
Ethos: your credibility; does speaker use sound logic, good sources, and honest presentation of topic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The concept of assumption that ties data to your thesis; the point you are trying to make about the thesis; reasons/ reasoning; logic

A

Warrant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What to look for when evaluating Evidence

A

is it current, sufficient, relevant, representative, consistent with audience’s experience, does it stray from credible sources, is it clearly defined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Another word for Inductive Logic

A

Informal Logic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Take smaller premise to come to a large conclusion; conclusion is built on lower/ smaller observations

A

Inductive Logic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The jump from premises to conclusions

A

Inductive Leap

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Begin with major, all-encompassing premise first; have a second smaller one that depends on the first premise; first relationship between premises must be sound for conclusion to be sound

A

Deductive Logic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

System of reasoning involving three proposition

A

Syllogism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The parts of syllogism

A

Major Premise
Minor Premise
Conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Specific errors in reasoning that arise in the flow of inductive and deductive logic; problematic jump in your conclusion

A

Logical Fallacies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Defects that weaken an argument

A

Fallacies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Meaning of ad populum

A

to the people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Arguer takes advantage of the desire most people have to be liked and to fit in with others and uses that desire to get the audience to accept their argument

A

Ad Populum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Common type of Ad Populum

A

Bandwagon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Arguer tries to convince audience to do. believe something because everyone else supposedly does

A

Bandwagon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Arguer sets up situation so it looks like only two choices then eliminates one choice so it seems that there is only one option; this option is what arguer wanted you to originally pick

A

False Dichotomy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Making assumptions on a group or range of cases based on a sample that is inadequate; usually it is atypical or just too small

A

Hasty Generalization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Applies an assumption to all cases without recognizing any possible exceptions

A

Sweeping Generalization

24
Q

What does post hoc, ergo proptor hoc

A

after this, therefore because of this

25
Q

What is post hoc also known as

A

False Cause

26
Q

Assuming that because b comes after a, a must have caused b

A

Post Hoc/ False Cause

27
Q

Relying on an analogy between 2 or more objects, ideas, or situations; if 2 things being compared aren’t alike in their relevant respects, analogy is a weak one causing logical fallacy

A

Weak Analogy

28
Q

We add strength to argument by referring to respected sources/ authority and explaining their position on issue being discussed

A

Appeal to Authority

29
Q

Takes place when arguer tries to get people to accept a conclusion by making them feel sorry for someone

A

Appeal to Pity

30
Q

Logical fallacy based on time

A

Appeal to Chronology

31
Q

Based on age; something is good or better because it is older and proven

A

Appeal to Tradition

32
Q

Something is somehow better solely because it is new; newness is evidence of truth

A

Appeal to Novelty

33
Q

Ad Hominem meaning

A

Against the person

34
Q

Tu quoque meaning

A

And you too!

35
Q

Conclusion usually is that you shouldn’t believe another’s argument; attacking the person themself rather than their argument

A

Ad Hominem

36
Q

Arguer claims that a sort of chain reaction, usually ending in a dire consequence, will take place, but there isn’t enough evidence for the assumption; inevitable consequences

A

Slippery Slope

37
Q

Asks the reader to simply accept the conclusion without real evidence; relies on premise (says same thing as conclusion) or ignore an important (but questionable) assumption that the argument rests on

A

Begging the Question/ Circular Logic

38
Q

Partway between argument, arguer goes off on tangent, raising side issue that distracts audience from what’s really at stake; arguer never returns to the original issue

A

Red Herring

39
Q

When a speaker/ writer addresses an opposing view or speaker and attacks their argument or character

40
Q

The presentation of only one side of an issue or viewpoint and is used subjectively to influence an audience

41
Q

Using the ideas or feelings that a certain word invokes to create certain emotional responses in an audience

A

Connotation

42
Q

Using an exact or precise meaning of a word, not an implies idea

A

Denotation

43
Q

Establishes authority and reliability and is used to gain the confidence and trust of the audience

44
Q

The representation of something as greater than is the case and is used to grab the attention of the audience and emphasize certain points

A

Exaggeration

45
Q

Uses facts or information that indicate whether a view is true or valid and is used to give weight to an argument or belief

46
Q

Creates imagery and express things non-literally; can help make an idea more emotive, vivid and convincing

A

Figurative Language

47
Q

Infers that a claim is true for most people and is used to speak to prevailing beliefs or prejudices of an audience

A

Generalization

48
Q

Special words or expressions used by a profession or certain groups; used to signal expertise and establish credibility

49
Q

Language like we or us to get a reader to agree with a claim

A

Inclusive Language

50
Q

Words charged with an underlying meaning or implication and are used to produce emotion in an audience

A

Loaded Words

51
Q

Involved thinking and forming judgements logically; used to appeal to the rationality of an audience

52
Q

Includes feelings accentuated by experiencing love, hate, fear, etc.; an appeal to emotion is used to engage with an audience and create an emotional response

53
Q

The recurrence of certain words or phrases and is used to emphasize certain ideas making them more memorable

A

Repetition

54
Q

Statements which are voiced as questions but are not expected to be answered; used to imply certain answers and draw audiences to certain conclusions

A

Rhetorical Questions

55
Q

Uses groups of three adjectives or phrases to make an idea memorable

A

Rule of Three