Quiz 1 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Making of IBP

A

IN THE MATTER OF THE IBP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Bar Flunkers

A

IN RE CUNANAN

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

10 years practice of law

A

CAYETANO v. MONSOD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

former PH lawyer reapply for bar

A

IN RE MUNESES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

undergrad units

A

IN THE MATTER OF DIAO V. MARTINEZ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

PhilSAT

A

PIMENTEL ET. AL v. LEB

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

brothers

A

CARONAN v. CARONAN

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

leaked bar qs

A

RE: 2003 BAR EXAMS, ATTY. DANIEL DE GUZMAN

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

bar exam during probation

A

IN RE ARGOSINO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Shari’a lawyer did not disclose crim cases

A

IN RE HARON S. MELING

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

forum shopping delay

A

MILLARE v. MONTERO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

compromise agreement w/o authority

A

SISON JR v. CAMACHO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

fake address paid but did not file annulment

A

NEBREJA v. REONEL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

BIR work permit paid no updates

A

PLUMPTRE v. RIVERA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

paid but did not file brother’s nullity

A

NICOLAS v. LAKI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

name dropped leonen

A

JUDGE DUMLAO v. CAMACHO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

alabang boys doj letterhead

A

VIZCONDE v. VERANO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

scalawags constructive criticism

A

MAGLASANG v. PEOPLE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

client is dead

A

MANGUBAT v. HERRERA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

lucio tan ill gotten wealth, former SolGen

A

PCGG v. SANDIGANBAYAN

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

goon squad

A

HIPOLITO V. ALEJANDRO-ABBAS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

false data in birth cert dont release w/o my permission

A

DELOS SANTOS II V. BARBOSA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

tweetie

A

GUEVARRA V. EALA

24
Q

wife disbar husband living w/ mistress

A

TAPUCAR V. TAPUCAR

25
Q

pahiram ng asawa mo

A

SALUDARES V. SALUDARES

26
Q

bhave n me beso

A

ADVINCULA v. MACABATA

27
Q

come again prof

A

RE: CRESENCIO P. CO UNTIAN JR.

28
Q

hindot ka

A

IN RE GADON

29
Q

bakla (derogatory)

A

CANETE v. PUTI

30
Q

false deed of cousin’s dead parents

A

JIMENO JR v. JIMENO

31
Q

property to Swiss foreigners illegal contract

A

KUPERS v. HONTANOSAS

32
Q

HONESTo

A

CABARROGUIS v.BASA

33
Q

drunk in court

A

BARANDON V. FERRER

34
Q

same sex marriage; outfit

A

FALCIS III v. CIVIL REGISTRAR GENERAL

35
Q

shouting mid-hearing

A

BACULI v. BATTUNG

36
Q

misquoted previous sc ruling

A

INSULAR LIFE v. INSULAR LIFE

37
Q

sound discretion

A

HIPOS SR. v. BAY

38
Q

plagiarism

A

IN RE DEL CASTILLO

39
Q

vinuya del castillo aftermath

A

RE: LETTER OF UP LAW FACULTY

40
Q

client abroad unregistered psych

A

BERZOLA v. BALDOVINO

41
Q

waiver and quitclaim labor case unsigned

A

SAMBAJON v. SUING

42
Q

single but married

A

LEDA v. TABANG

43
Q

suppressing material facts burial expenses

A

ORBIT TRANSPO CO. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMM

44
Q

dummy corporations

A

LIM v. MENDOZA

45
Q

What is CANON 1 all about?

A

INDEPENDENCE — The independence of a lawyer in the discharge of professional duties without any improper influence, restriction, pressure, or interference, direct or indirect, ensures effective legal representation and is ultimately imperative for the rule of law.

46
Q

CANON 1 Section 1.

A

Independent, accessible, efficient and effective legal service. — A lawyer shall make legal services accessible in an efficient and effective manner. In performing this duty, a lawyer shall maintain independence, act with integrity, and at all times ensure the efficient and effective delivery of justice.

47
Q

CANON 1 Section 2.

A

Merit-based practice. — A lawyer shall rely solely on the merits of a cause and not exert, or give the appearance of, any influence on, nor undermine the authority of, the court, tribunal or other government agency, or its proceedings.

48
Q

CANON 1 Section 3.

A

Freedom from improper considerations and external influences — A lawyer shall not, in advocating a client’s cause, be influenced by dishonest or immoral considerations, external influences, or pressure.

49
Q

CANON 1 Section 4.

A

Non-interference by a lawyer. — Unless authorized by law or a court, a lawyer shall not assist or cause a branch, agency, office or officer of the government to interfere in any matter before any court, tribunal, or other government agency.

50
Q

CANON 1 Section 5.

A

Lawyer’s duty and discretion in procedure and strategy. — A lawyer shall not allow the client to dictate or determine the procedure in handling the case.

Nevertheless, a lawyer shall respect the client’s decision to settle or compromise the case after explaining its consequences to the client.

51
Q

What is CANON 2 all about?

A

PROPRIETY — A lawyer shall, at all times, act with propriety and maintain the appearance of propriety in personal and professional dealings, observe honesty, respect and courtesy, and uphold the dignity of the legal profession consistent with the highest standards of ethical behavior.

52
Q

CANON 2 Section 1

A

Proper conduct. — A lawyer shall not engage in unlawful, dishonest, immoral, or deceitful conduct.

53
Q

CANON 2 Section 2

A

Dignified conduct. — A lawyer shall respect the law, the courts, tribunals, and other government agencies, their officials, employees, and processes, and act with courtesy, civility, fairness, and candor towards fellow members of the bar.

A lawyer shall not engage in conduct that adversely reflects on one’s fitness to practice law, nor behave in a scandalous manner, whether in public or private life, to the discredit of the legal profession.

54
Q

CANON 2 Section 3

A

Safe environment; avoid all forms of abuse or harassment. — A lawyer shall not create or promote an unsafe or hostile environment, both in private and public settings, whether online, in workplaces, educational or training institutions, or in recreational areas.

To this end, a lawyer shall not commit any form of physical, sexual, psychological, or economic abuse or violence against another person. A lawyer is also prohibited from engaging in any gender-based harassment or discrimination.

55
Q

CANON 2 Section 4

A

Use of dignified, gender-fair, and child- and culturally-sensitive language. — A lawyer shall use only dignified, gender-fair, child- and culturally-sensitive language in all personal and professional dealings.

To this end, a lawyer shall not use language which is abusive, intemperate, offensive or otherwise improper, oral or written, and whether made through traditional or electronic means, including all forms or types of mass or social media.

56
Q

Canon 2 Section 5

A

Observance of fairness and obedience. — A lawyer shall, in every personal and professional engagement, insist on the observance of the principles of fairness and obedience to the law.