Quistclose trusts Flashcards
Typical scenario
A lent money on condition that it is used for a specific purpose
B owes A money but becomes insolvent
A does not join general pool of creditors, has priority
Barclays Bank v Quistclose Investments (Wilberforce)
a) When money is advanced, primary trust arises fro common intention for the specific purpose
b) When purpose fails, secondary trust arises by implication
c) Knowledge of this specific purpose prevents it from conscionably claiming the money
Difficulties in Wilberforce’s explanation
a) Nature of primary trust
- Primary trust offends beneficiary principle (would fail)
- Secondary trust only arises if primary purpose fails
b) Nature and basis of lender’s rights to ensure that money is spent for the stipulated purpose
- No trust for lender until primary trust fails
- Unclear where the immediate equitable right comes from
Lord Millett’s extrajudicial response to Quistclose
Not express trust for benefit of contemplated beneficiaries or non-charitable purpose trust, or loan subject to undertaking
What it is: undertaking to use funds only for specific purposes, giving rise to fiduciary relationship
- No intention to transfer beneficial interest to borrower, so only resulting trust, not constructive
- Beneficial interest remained throughout in the lender, subject to borrower’s power or duty to apply funds according to fiduciary undertaking
Twinsetra v Yardley - what QC trust is
What A lends money to B on the condition that B applies money only for specific purpose, trust of money immediately arises in A’s favour, but trust is defeasible by exercise of power vested in B to apply the money to specific purpose
- Nature of trust: resulting trust
- Borrower has no beneficial interest, remains with lender
- If/when money is applied, the trust ends = personal duty to repay lender
Advantages of Lord Millett in Twinsetra
a) A has freedom to convey money to B while having equitable interest in it
b) Resolves problem of non-charitable purpose trust
c) Lower threshold of establishing trust (benevolent cosntruction)
Penner: QC trust whenever condition is attached to loan or purpose is stated, despite parties having no positive intention to retain the beneficial interest
Alternative by Chambers: borrower’s lack of free disposal = borrower has full beneficial ownership of money
- Lender only has equitable right to prevent use fo fund for any other purpose
Twinsetra v Yardley - when the trust arises
At the point of the undertaking when it was common intention to use the money for the specific purpose
Twinsetra v Yardley - nature of QC trust
Automatic - beneficial interest not fully disposed at point of undertaking
Presumed - transfer of property, with no intention to benefit recipient (like gratuitous transfer)
Challioner v Juliet Bellis & Co
Objective test to determine if/when QC trust arises
Nature - ambiguous
Intention to create trust by transferor = express?
Not presumed to exist unless contrary intention is proved = NOT presumed resulting trust
Current approach to QC trusts
If there is sufficient evidence that trust is intended in borrower’s favour = express trust (Hudson)
If there is sufficient evidence that lender does not itnend money to be at free disposal of borrower, but insufficient evidence that lender formed positive intention to keep money = resulting (Lord Millett, Penner)
Alternative approach to QC trusts
Constructive trusts with a power (YK Liew)