Questions likely to come up Flashcards
Advantages of transferring the pension
Advantages
Flexibility over the form in which the benefits are taken;
Generally greater death benefits and ability to leave them to a wider range of recipients
(nominees and successors);
Possibly increased flexibility over retirement date – this is dependent on scheme rules;
Tax free death benefits on death prior to age 75 (this is not the case with DB income
benefits!!!);
Possibly ability to retire early without incurring an early retirement reduction (in the
event that the scheme allows early retirement). Be careful with this one as annuities
will also generally provide lower rates and drawdown plans lower sustainable
withdrawal rates for earlier retirements;
Likely entitlement to a higher PCLS (DC ones are generally higher – this can generally
be worked out from the information in the case study);
Ability to benefit from investment returns;
Greater control over the client’s tax position;
Opportunity to benefit from investment returns (need to consider attitude to risk in the
context of critical yield. Is it achievable given the client’s risk constraints?)
Disadvantages of transferring the pension
Disadvantages
Loss of the guarantees provided by the scheme;
Loss of the inbuilt revaluation and escalation;
Loss of inbuilt dependants pensions;
Loss of the protection offered by the PPF;
The member is subject to investment risk;
And shortfall risk;
And potentially longevity risk;
The DB scheme is simple to understand and administer;
No ongoing advice/ monitoring fees with the DB scheme;
Exposure to historically low and fluctuating annuity rates;
Lifetime allowance issues are more likely to come into play given current transfer
values.
Factors which would indicate that the client should/ should not transfer
An adventurous/ cautious attitude to risk;
Significant other assets or other income (high capacity for loss)/ Minimal other assets
or income (low capacity for loss);
Willing/ unwilling to give up guarantees;
Need for flexible income/ no need for flexibility;
Low expectations/ high expectations of inflation;
Significant investment experience/ no investment experience;
Poor health & low life expectancy (guarantees & escalation not likely to be as valuable)/
good health and long life expectancy (likely to be valuable). Also CETVs do not take
into account the health of the client. Need to consider IHT implications if in extreme
ill health;
The client is close to retirement date and needs to consider the shape of their
retirement benefits/ some way from their retirement date and likely to have little
certainty over their future income and lump sum needs;
Low critical yield/ high critical yield (also needs to be considered in the context of the
client’s attitude to risk);
Willingness/ unwillingness to accept the uncertainty surrounding potential legislative
changes;
Need for higher PCLS/ no need for PCLS;
Non-dependent children or other family members who the client wishes to pass funds
to as part of their estate planning/ no relatives (need for flexibility in terms of death
benefits);
Requirement for control over their tax position/ no such need;
Ability to retire earlier – may be a positive factor depending when the client wishes to
retire and whether the scheme allows early retirement/ at what penalty;
Lifetime allowance issues – transfer values are high and can sometimes result in LTA
excess tax charges;
Protection issues – sometimes transfers may impact on the client’s LTA protection –
mainly an issue with ETVs;
The scheme has a funding deficit/ is well funded;
Willingness/ unwillingness to forego the protection offered by the PPF;
Willingness/ unwillingness to pay ongoing monitoring and advice charges;
Enhanced/ temporarily reduced transfer valu
Additional information required regarding the DB scheme to provide advice
Accrual rate;
Date of joining the scheme;
Date of leaving the scheme;
Scheme basis (FS/ CARE);
Pensionable earnings;
PCLS entitlement (separate/ commutation);
Commutation rate (if applicable);
Death benefits available pre and post-retirement;
Scheme definition of dependants;
Whether it was previously contracted out and for what periods;
Revaluation rate GMP/ non GMP;
Escalation rate GMP/ non GMP;
Funding status;
GMP entitlement if applicable;
GMP revaluation basis;
Pre/ post-88 GMP;
Enhancement/ reduction to transfer value;
Any state pension offset;
CETV offered;
Whether the scheme allows partial transfers;
Early retirement factors/ late retirement increases
Information required from the client in order to assess the suitability of a transfer
Defined benefits lump sum death benefit;
The client’s health/ life expectancy/ family longevity history;
The intended current age and intended retirement date;
Attitude to risk;
Current financial position/ capacity for loss
Expectations of inflation;
Willingness to pay advice/ monitoring fees;
Any significant lump sum capital expenditure requirements;
Likely expenditure in retirement;
Pattern of expenditure throughout retirement;
Requirement for flexibility of income and importance against guarantees;
The client’s likely retirement income tax rates;
The client’s total pension provision and LTA position;
Potential IHT position;
State pension age and NIC record;
Any outstanding liabilities and plans for repayment;
Any expected inheritances/ capital lump sums;
Any spouse/ dependants and ages they will be dependant until;
Requirement to provide death benefits/ flexibility or death benefits.
Potential death benefits and tax treatment
Potential death benefits available from a DB scheme and their tax treatment
Defined benefits lump sum death benefit;
Maybe a set amount, a multiple of salary or linked to some other measure;
If the member was aged under 75 at the time of death then this will be paid free of tax;
So long as it is paid within 2 years of the scheme administrator becoming aware of the
death;
The payment will be tested against the lifetime allowance;
If it is not made within 2 years, or if the member was over the age of 75, then it will be
taxed at the recipient’s marginal rate;
And there will be no lifetime allowance test;
Where benefits are paid to a non-natural person (trust etc…) a special lump sum death
benefits tax charge of 45% will apply;
Usually free of IHT provided the nomination is not binding on the scheme administrator;
Dependant’s pension paid as ongoing income;
Taxed at the recipient’s marginal rate;
Not tested against the lifetime allowance;
Can only be paid to someone meeting the HMRC/ scheme definition of a dependant;
Continuing income under a guarantee period;
Can be paid to any nominated individual;
Taxable at the recipient’s marginal rate;
Can be paid for a maximum ten year period;
Trivial commutation lump sum death benefit;
Can be paid if the actuarial value of the benefits is under £30,000;
Taxable as income in the hands of the recipient
Potential death benefits and tax treatment
Uncrystallised DC schemes
Lump sum return of the fund value;
Dependant’s/ nominee’s flexi access drawdown;
Dependant’s/ nominee’s lifetime annuity;
Tax free if the member died under the age of 75;
However, the value of the funds crystallised will be tested against the member’s lifetime
allowance;
Excess benefits will be subject to an LTA excess tax charge;
At 55% if taken as a lump sum;
Or 25% plus income tax if taken as income;
Taxed at the recipient’s marginal rate if the member died over the age of 75;
Or if not paid within the 2 year period;
However, there will then be no LTA test;
Benefits are not subject to IHT;
They can be paid to any nominee, not just dependants;
Nominee’s FAD does not trigger the recipient’s MPAA
Potential death benefits and tax treatment
Flexi access drawdown funds
Lump sum return of the fund value;
Dependant’s/ nominee’s flexi access drawdown;
Dependant’s/ nominee’s lifetime annuity;
Tax free if the member died under the age of 75;
No further LTA test as the payment comes from crystallised funds;
Taxed at the recipient’s marginal rate if the member died over the age of 75;
Or if lump sum benefits are not paid within the 2 year period;
Income benefits are tax free where the member was under 75 regardless of the two
year designation period;
If over 75 and paid to a trust, subject to 45% lump sum tax charge;
Benefits are not subject to IHT;
They can be paid to any nominee, not just dependants;
Nominee’s FAD does not trigger the recipient’s MPAA
Potential death benefits and tax treatment
Lifetime annuity
Joint life annuity;
The second party can receive ongoing income payments tax free if the member was
under 75 on death;
Or at the beneficiary’s marginal rate if over 75;
No further LTA test;
Continuing income payments under a guarantee period;
No maximum term, subject to the commercial judgement of the provider;
No LTA test;
Tax free if the member was under 75 at the date of death;
And paid within the 2 years;
Taxed at recipient’s marginal rate if over 75/ outside 2 years;
Not subject to IHT;
Annuity protection lump sum death benefit;
Tax free under 75/ marginal rate if over;
Usually free of IHT provided the nomination is non-binding;
Flexible annuities do not trigger the recipient’s MPAA;
Payments can be made to any nominee, not just a dependant
Process for carrying out a TVC
Calculate the preserved pension at the date of leaving the scheme;
Which will be based on a definition of pensionable salary, the scheme’s accrual
rate, and the length of time in the scheme;
This is then revalued up to the member’s NRD in line with the scheme rules;
Where information is known, such as fixed rates and historic inflation (i.e. from the
date of leaving to the date of the calculation) these known rates of revaluation are
used;
Where information is not known, such as future inflation and future average weekly
earnings increases (particularly for S148 revaluation) an assumption is used, which
is set by the FCA;
The revalued pension is then converted to a capital sum using mortality tables and
an annuity interest rate assumption set by the FCA;
The annuity rate takes into account the PCLS payable, plus the value of any death
benefits such as guarantee/dependent’s pension, plus the rate of escalation in
payment, so the rate will include an inflation assumption where future increases in
payment are based on inflation;
This future capitalised value is then discounted back to the date of the calculation
Using a discount rate based on gilt yields;
The gilt yield used is based on the fixed coupon yield on the UK FTSE Actuaries
Indices for the appropriate term;
Product charges will be assumed during accumulation of 0.75%. There is no
explicit allowance for adviser charges during accumulation. This 0.75% is deducted
from the discount rate;
This calculation provides the current cost of replacing the defined benefits. This is
the amount of money you would need to invest in today (using FCA assumptions),
which will grow between now and NRD, to give you an amount of money at NRD
to secure the defined benefits via an annuity;
This is then compared to the CETV, and the shortfall between the CETV and the
“cost of replacement” identified;
This must be explained clearly to the client;
The TVC allows the adviser to illustrate to the client;
This is how much you would need to replace the benefits you’re giving up, should
you transfer and change your mind at a later date, but based on the calculations
today;
YOUR scheme is offering you £XXX less than the amount that I have calculated
(using the assumptions instructed by my regulator, the FCA) are worth;
These calculations are prescribed by our regulator. This is how your benefits would
be valued and how much you would need, if you were to seek to replicate your
scheme pension benefits in the future, but outside the occupational pension
scheme.
The main differences between a TVC and a TVAS
TVAS calculates the critical yield;
Which is the annualised return required, after charges, to match the capitalised
value of the defined benefits at NRD, and SRD if relevant;
Critical yields give an indication of the value-for-money of the transfer; with high
CYs indicating lower value/lower CYs indicating higher value;
Which intends to help advisers determine the suitability of the transfer;
On the other hand, the TVC calculates the capitalised value of the DB scheme
based on the FCA’s assumptions – the “cost of replacement” of the DB scheme
benefits;
Including a discount rate based on gilt yields;
4% initial charge on annuity purchase;
0.75% ongoing annual charge assumed during accumulation, reducing the
assumed yield;
This is then compared to the CETV;
To show the pounds-and-pence shortfall between the CETV offered by the
scheme, and the cost of replacing the DB benefits outside the scheme, based on
the FCA’s assumptions;
Like TVAS, TVC is designed to help demonstrate suitability and value for money
of a proposed transfer;
TVAS was a regulatory requirement for DB transfer advice up to 1st October 2018,
when it was superseded by TVC.
The risks and factors to be covered as part of an appropriate pension transfer analysis
(APTA)
Health status; Loss of guarantees; Whether the client has a partner of dependants; Inflation; Whether the client has shopped around; Sustainability of income; The client’s tax position; Charges; Impact on the client’s tax position; Debt
The risks that the client is exposed to as a result of a decision to transfer out of a
defined benefit scheme
Investment risk – the fact that the value of the funds could go down;
Shortfall/ mortality risk - the risk of the client outliving their money and being left with
a shortfall;
Inflation risk – the risk that inflation will rise more quickly than the return on savings
and investments reducing the purchasing power of those savings and investments;
Transfer risk – The loss of guaranteed benefits as a result of the transfer out of the
arrangement;
Behavioural bias – the risk arising from the natural human inclination to prefer
something in the hand now as opposed to something which will be of greater benefit
at a later date;
Product risk – the risk of being unable to secure an annuity / guaranteed income in
the future;
Sequencing risk – the risk of the sustainability of the client’s withdrawals from a flexiaccess drawdown arrangement being impacted by the sequence of returns;
Liquidity risk – the possibility of the client’s ability to take withdrawals being impacted
by illiquidity within the underlying investments
Another potential five marker would be the risk warnings required by the FCA to be covered
when recommending a flexi-access drawdown fund (COBS 9.4.10):
The capital value of the fund may be eroded;
The investment returns may be less than those shown in the illustrations;
Annuity or scheme pension rates may be at a worse level in the future;
The levels of income provided may not be sustainable; and
There may be tax implications.
Reasons for an increase/ decrease in transfer value
The calculation of a CETV relies on several assumptions made by the scheme actuary.
Transfer values are sensitive to changes in those assumptions.
An increase in the assumption for future inflation rates would increase transfer values;
This is because future revaluation would be carried out at a higher rate;
And the inbuilt escalation in payment would also have a higher value placed on it;
Conversely, a lower assumption for inflation would decrease transfer values;
Increased assumptions for national average earnings may increase the transfer value;
This would increase the revaluation applied to any GMP the client may have accrued;
A decrease in annuity rate assumptions would increase a transfer value as has
happened over recent years;
This is because lower annuity rates increase the value of the capital required to
purchase an income equivalent to the DB pension;
An increase in life expectancy/ decrease in mortality may increase cash equivalent
transfer values as the scheme actuary would expect to be paying the income for longer;
A decrease in expectations for investment returns would increase the CETV. This is
because the client would have to invest a higher amount in order to provide a lump
sum at retirement sufficient to replicate the DB benefits. Conversely, greater assumed
returns would reduce CETV;
If the client is nearer to the NRD, this may increase the CETV as they would have less
time to make up charges on the investment;