Questions

Question 1

What does Expected Value calculate?

Answer 1

the average outcome of uncertain events

Question 2

What is the role of Expected Utility Theory?

Answer 2

extends the calculation of the Expected Value by considering the utility (or subjective value) individuals assign to outcomes, acknowledging that people have different risk tolerances

Question 3

What is the role of Prospect Theory?

Answer 3

furhter refines the understanding (Expected Value + Expected Utility Theory) by showing how people actually make decisions under risk, highlighting biases like loss aversion and framing effects

Question 4

Differences between Expected Value, Expected Utility Theory, and Prospect Theory

Answer 4

1. Expected Value calculates the average outcome of uncertain events
2. Expected Utility Theory extends this by considering the utility (or subjective value) individuals assign to outcomes, acknowledging that people have different risk tolerances
3. Prospect Theory further refines this understanding by showing how people actually make decisions under risk, highlighting biases like loss aversion and framing effects.

Question 5

Give an example of Framing Effect

Answer 5

When a surgery’s success is framed as “90% survive” versus “10% die,” even though the statistics are identical, the former framing makes people more likely to choose the surgery. This is considered irrational because the decision is influenced by how the information is presented, not by the content itself. Prospect Theory explains this by showing that the framing alters the reference point, affecting the perceived value of outcomes

Question 6

Describe the St. Petersburg Paradox.

Answer 6

This paradox illustrates a situation where a game with an infinite expected value (theoretically offering unlimited earnings) is not appealing to most people because the likelihood of high payouts is extremely low. Expected Utility Theory explains this by introducing the concept of diminishing marginal utility, suggesting that the utility of wealth increases at a decreasing rate, which rationalizes why people would not pay a high entry fee for the game

Question 7

Describe the Allais Paradox.

Answer 7

This paradox demonstrates that people’s choices can violate the expected utility theory’s prediction, showing a preference inconsistency when faced with certain versus probabilistic outcomes. Prospect Theory explains this using the concepts of certainty effect and non-linear probability weighting, which shows how people overweight certain outcomes and small probabilities, deviating from expected utility maximization.

Question 8

Describe the Propsect Theory (Insurance and Lotteries)

Answer 8

Prospect Theory explains this contradictory behavior through the value function, which is concave for gains (risk-averse behavior, like buying insurance) and convex for losses (risk-seeking behavior, like playing lotteries), and through loss aversion, where the pain of losing is stronger than the pleasure of gaining an equivalent amount.

Question 9

When does the Sunk Cost Fallacy occur?

Answer 9

when individuals continue a behavior or endeavor as a result of previously invested resources (time, money, or effort)

Explanations:
- commitment to the decision
- fear of wastefulness
- a desire to avoid regret

Question 10

What is Mental Accounting?

Answer 10

The tendency to categorize, allocate, and evaluate economic outcomes by assigning them to specific accounts mentally. Example: Treating $100 of gambling winnings differently from $100 of salary

Question 11

What is Hedonic Framing?

Answer 11

The practice of framing decisions in a way that separates or integrates outcomes to manipulate emotional impact. Example: Preferring to receive two separate bonuses (segregating gains) but preferring to consolidate losses into one

Question 12

What is Money Illusion?

Answer 12

The tendency of people to think of currency in nominal, rather than real, terms. This can lead to irrational decisions, such as feeling richer despite inflation reducing purchasing power

Question 13

What is the Equity Premium Puzzle?

Answer 13

The observation that stocks have historically returned significantly more than bonds, more than can be explained by classical financial theories. Myopic loss aversion suggests that investors’ short-term risk aversion and frequent portfolio evaluations can lead to a demand for higher risk premiums for stocks

Question 14

What is the Disposition Effect?

Answer 14

The tendency to sell assets that have increased in value and hold assets that have decreased in value.

This can be explained by the value function in Prospect Theory, which is concave for gains (leading to risk-averse behavior) and convex for losses (leading to risk-seeking behavior), as well as mental accounting, regret theory, gambler’s fallacy, and wishful thinking

Question 15

Explain the Equity Premium Puzzle.

Answer 15

The explanations for Equity Premium Puzzle from a behavioral perspective include the influence of psychological biases and preferences that deviate from rational expectations, such as loss aversion and overreaction to recent financial market performance.

Question 16

What is the role of Exponential Discounting?

Answer 16

Assumes a constant rate of time preference, leading to consistent choices over time.

Question 17

What is the role of Hyperbolic Discounting?

Answer 17

Suggests that the rate of time preference decreases over time, leading to inconsistencies in choices over time.

Question 18

Compare Exponential Discounting and Hyperbolic Discounting.

Answer 18

1. Exponential Discounting: Assumes a constant rate of time preference, leading to consistent choices over time.
2. Hyperbolic Discounting: Suggests that the rate of time preference decreases over time, leading to inconsistencies in choices over time.

Question 19

People tend to prefer improving sequence (e.g., increasing
salary profile). Why is that inconsistent with conventional time
discounting model in textbooks? What are possible
explanations offered from insights of behavioral preferences?

Answer 19

• suggests people value future gains more when they are seen as improving over time, contrary to the model’s assumption of consistent valuation of future benefits

Behavioral preferences suggest possible explanations, including the anticipation of future happiness, a desire for improvement, and the psychological impact of positive changes over time. These insights highlight the complexity of human preferences beyond simple economic models.

Question 20

1. Why people use heuristics? What is the advantage and
   disadvantage to use heuristics?

Answer 20

People use heuristics as decision-making shortcuts, which have evolutionary advantages because they simplify the decision-making process and save time and resources. The disadvantage is that heuristics often make sense but falter when used outside of their natural domain.

Question 21

2. What is the difference of risk and ambiguity? What is
   ambiguity aversion? What is Ellsberg Paradox? Why is it a
   paradox?

Answer 21

Risk involves situations with known probabilities, while ambiguity involves situations with unknown probabilities. Ambiguity aversion is the preference for known risks over unknown ones. The Ellsberg Paradox demonstrates ambiguity aversion, where people prefer a gamble with known probabilities over one with unknown probabilities, violating the principle of expected utility theory. It’s a paradox because it shows rational actors deviating from the expected utility theory due to the presence of ambiguity

Question 22

3. What is endowment effect and what is status quo bias? What
   is the possible heuristics for both biases?

Answer 22

The endowment effect is the tendency to value an owned object more highly than a non-owned object. Status quo bias is the preference to keep things in their current state rather than change. A possible heuristic for both biases could be a desire to avoid loss or change, influencing individuals to overvalue their current possessions or situation

Question 23

4. Give examples of home bias in investment. Give potential
   rational and behavioral explanations. What is the potential
   heuristics underlying the behavioral explanations?

Answer 23

Home bias refers to investors’ preference for domestic over foreign assets. Rational explanations include informational advantages and transaction costs( institutnal restrcitions such as capital movement restrictions, diffenrential trading costs, differential tax rates), while behavioral explanations involve familiarity and excessive optimism. The underlying heuristic might be a preference for the familiar, leading to a perceived lower risk and overoptimism about domestic investments.

Financial behavior stemming from familiarity: home bias, distance & culture, investing in your employer or brands you know

Question 24

5. What is conjunction fallacy? Using Linda example to explain
   the underlying heuristics of conjunction fallacy.

Answer 24

The conjunction fallacy occurs when people incorrectly judge the conjunction of two events to be more probable than one of the events in isolation. In the Linda example, people mistakenly believe it’s more likely for Linda to be a bank teller and active in the feminist movement than merely being a bank teller, due to the representativeness heuristic

Question 25

6. Give an example of investment behavior of structured
   products that violates probability rules and commits conjunction
   fallacy.

Answer 25

An example involves barrier products in finance, where subjects estimated a higher probability for a bad event happening to one index compared to three indices, demonstrating the conjunction fallacy. This misjudgment can be explained by subjects perceiving individual indices as riskier due to lower familiarity, akin to the Linda example but also due to “compensation” due to the addtion of familiar indices

Question 26

7. Using Bayesian framework to explain why representative
   heuristics can lead to neglect of base rate and conservatism
   bias.

Answer 26

The representative heuristic can lead to neglect of base rate (giving too little weight to the base probability) and conservatism bias (overweighting the base rate and giving too little weight to new evidence), both of which deviate from the Bayesian framework of updating beliefs accurately based on new evidence

Question 27

8. Explain how representative heuristics can lead to gambler’s
   fallacy and hot-hand fallacy?

Answer 27

The gambler’s fallacy arises from the belief that future probabilities are influenced by past events, leading to the incorrect assumption that a deviation from what occurs on average will be corrected in the short term. The hot-hand fallacy is the belief in streaks affecting outcomes in random sequences, such as believing a basketball player on a scoring streak has a higher probability of scoring on the next shot

Question 28

9. Most people believes that if a company has high-quality
   management, a strong image and has enjoyed consistent
   growth in earnings, it must be a good investment. Is the view
   consistent with efficient market hypothesis? Which heuristics
   may drive such belief? Explain how such belief may lead to
   small-firm effect and value premium.

Answer 28

The belief that companies with high-quality management and consistent growth are good investments does not align with the efficient market hypothesis, which suggests that all available information is already reflected in stock prices. The representativeness heuristic may drive this belief, leading to biases like the small-firm effect and value premium, as investors may overvalue well-managed or fast-growing companies

Question 29

10. Explain anchoring and adjustment heuristics. Give an
    example from surveys or experiments.

Answer 29

Anchoring occurs when individuals rely too heavily on an initial piece of information (anchor) when making decisions. An example is estimating the multiplication of numbers 1 through 10 in ascending vs. descending order, showing how initial information influences the final estimation significantly

Question 30

11. What is probability calibration? Give overconfidence vs.
    underconfidence can be reflected in probability judgment and
    confidence interval estimation?

Answer 30

This section was not explicitly covered in the provided excerpts. However, probability calibration involves accurately estimating the likelihood of an event, where overconfidence can lead to overestimating one’s accuracy in predictions, and underconfidence the opposite.

Question 31

12. What is the difference between excessive optimism and
    overconfidence-driven probability miscalibration? Give an
    example.

Answer 31

Excessive optimism refers to an overall positive outlook that can affect judgment, while overconfidence specifically relates to overestimating one’s knowledge or abilities. An example would be investors overestimating their ability to predict market movements, leading to potential miscalibration of probabilities.

Question 32

13. What are better-than-average effect and illusion of control?

Answer 32

These concepts refer to the tendency of individuals to overestimate their abilities or influence over events, respectively. The better-than-average effect is the belief that one is better than others in certain aspects, while the illusion of control is the belief that one can control or influence outcomes that are largely random or determined by chance.

Question 33

14. What are self-attribution bias, hindsight bias and
    confirmation bias?

Answer 33

Self-attribution bias involves attributing successes to one’s own actions and failures to external factors. Hindsight bias is the tendency to see past events as having been predictable. Confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one’s preexisting beliefs or hypotheses.

Question 34

15. What is excessive trading? What are the potential reasons
    that are related to overconfidence?

Answer 34

Excessive trading can be driven by overconfidence, where investors believe they have superior knowledge or information, leading to more frequent trading than is warranted by market conditions.

Question 35

16. Would overconfidence lead to more mergers? What are the
    possible hypotheses?

Answer 35

Overconfidence can lead to more mergers, as CEOs may overestimate their ability to successfully integrate and manage another company, leading to potentially unwarranted optimism about the outcome of the merger.

Question 36

17. Give two examples of proxy variables used in the research
    for CEO overconfidence.

Answer 36

Examples of proxy variables for researching CEO overconfidence might include the frequency of optimistic language in earnings calls or public statements, or the ratio of executed mergers and acquisitions compared to industry norms, indicating a propensity towards aggressive expansion strategies.