Quasi Delict Flashcards
ELEMENTS OF QUASI DELICTS
- Damage suffered by the plaintiff
- Fault or negligence on part of the defendant or of some other person for whose acts he must respond
- Connection of cause and effect between the fault or negligence of the defendant and damages incurred by the plaintiff.
- No pre-existing contractual relationship between the parties
Statutory Definition of Fault or Negligence
Art. 1173. The fault or negligence of the obligor consists in the omission of that diligence which is required by the nature of the obligation and corresponds with the circumstances of the persons, time and place. When negligence shows bad faith, the provisions of Articles 1171 and 2201 apply.
Jurisprudential Definition of FAULT
Child Learning Center v. Andamo
- signifies a voluntary act or omission which causes damage to the right of another, giving rise to an obligation on the part of the actor to repair such damage
- IT REQUIRES THE EXECUTION OF A POSITIVE ACT
Jurisprudential Definition of NEGLIGENCE
Child Learning Center v. Tagario
Negligence is the failure to observe for the protection of interest of another, that degree of care, precaution and vigilance which circumstances justly demand.
-omission to do an act, which results to damage.
Reasonable Causal Connection Rule for labor cases
Indophil v. Adviento
If there is a reasonable causal connection between the claim asserted and the employer-employee relationship, then the case is within the jurisdiction of the labor courts. In the absence thereof, regular courts have jurisdiction.
Art. 2194
The responsibility of two or more persons who are liable for a quasi-delict is solidary.
When is the fetus considered born?
A fetus is deemed born if it is alive at the time it is completely delivered from the mother’s womb. However, if the intra-uterine life of less than seven months, it is not deemed born if it dies within 24 hours after its complete delivery from the maternal womb.
(Art 41, Civil Code)
Requisites of liability as joint tortfeasors
- Both causes of action are based on quasi-delict
2. Single injury to the defendant. Otherwise, each responsible for the consequences of his respective negligent act.
Doctrine in Sabido v. Custodio on Join Tortfeasors
Where the concurrent or successive negligent acts or omissions of 2 or more persons, although acting independently of each other are , in combination, the direct and proximate cause of a single injury to a third person, AND it is impossible to determine in what proportion each contributed to the injury even though his act ALONE might not have caused the whole injury.
Third party defendant vis a vis victory of third party plaintiff.
(Singapore Airlines LTD v. CA)
Third party defendant cannot benefit form the victory of third party plaintiff if they have contradictory defenses.
JOINT TORTFEASORS
Chan v. INC
All persons who command, instigate, promote, encourage, advise, countenance, cooperate in, aid or abet the commission of a tort or who approve of it after it is done, if done for their benefit.
GROSS NEGLIGENCE
Chan v. INC
Entire want of care as to raise a presumption that the person in fault is conscious of the probable consequences of carelessness and is indifferent, or worse, to the danger of injury to person or property of others
Liability of insurers
Vda. De Maglana v. Consolacion
Cannot be held jointly and severally liable with insured because liability of insurer is based on contract, insured is based on tort.
Only directly liable under insurance contract.
- in the event of death of any person entitled to indemnity, insurer shall pay representatives