Quantitative UX Glossary Terms Flashcards
Benchmark
A single number that you want to compare your site to. A benchmark could be a value that you are aiming for or a value obtained from a third-party study.
Benchmarking Study
A study intended to measure the user experience of a product over time. It usually involves looking at the same metrics over different iterations of the product. A benchmarking study might compare the most recent set of metrics (which represent your product’s current performance) against the metric values collected in past studies. This comparison can help reveal whether and how much your product has improved over time.
Between-Subjects Design
A study design in which different participants are assigned to different conditions corresponding to a variable. For example, in a between-subjects study, you might recruit 80 participants for a quantitative usability study, and randomly assign each participant to either site A or site B. This type of study design is usually contrasted with within-subjects design.
Binary Metric
A metric that can have only two possible values. Examples include task success or conversion (that is, whether a certain desired event has happened — for example, whether a user has registered for an account).
Center of a dataset
One number that summarizes the dataset. The average (i.e., arithmetic mean) is usually used for the center of a dataset. However, with skewed distributions like task times, the median or the geometric mean may be more appropriate.
Categorical Metric
A metric that can take only a limited, fixed number of values. For example, t-shirt size; (e.g., S, M, L) is a categorical variable.
Confidence Interval
Likely range for the true score of your entire population. In other words, the confidence interval is a range of values that is likely to contain the value that you’re aiming to find. It is closely related to the concept of margin of error.
Confidence Variable
How confident you can be in your confidence-interval calculation. This value can be chosen by the researcher. In UX, we usually use 95% or 90% confidence levels. Essentially, choosing a lower confidence level indicates that you’re more tolerant of the risk that the confidence interval may not actually cover the true score of a metric, obtained across the whole user population.
Confounding Variable
A hidden variable that influences both the independent and dependent variable(s), causing a false relationship between the two
Continuous Metric
A metric that can take any value between two possible values. In general, metrics that can be expressed with any number of decimals are continuous. Time on task is an example of a continuous metric.
Confidence Level
How confident you can be in your confidence-interval calculation. This value can be chosen by the researcher. In UX, we usually use 95% or 90% confidence levels. Essentially, choosing a lower confidence level indicates that you’re more tolerant of the risk that the confidence interval may not actually cover the true score of a metric, obtained across the whole user population.
Dependent Variable
A variable that is measured in a study and whose value is expected to vary based on the manipulation of the independent variable. For example, we may change our design (the independent variable) and look to see if that impacts how satisfied users are with the product (the dependent variable).
Discrete Metric
A metric that can take only a set of countable, prescribed values. A categorical metric is always discrete. Rating scales are discrete; other examples of discrete metrics include the number of user visits to a site and the number of errors made in a task.
External Validity
A quality of a study that ensures that the study setup and participants are naturalistic and reflect the real-world situation
Independent Variable
A variable that is manipulated by the researcher in a study. Then researchers look at the dependent variable(s) to see if the independent variable has had any impact.
Internal Validity
A quality of a study that ensures that the study setup does not favor any condition or participant response and that all conditions are treated in the same way