Qs Flashcards
What are the two main points held in law in relation to R V Harney
Recklessness involves a foresight of dangerous consequence that could well happen together with an intention to continue the course of action regardless of the risk
Outline “specified intent” in relation to forgery
The prosecution must prove that, at the time of the alleged act, the defendant, knowing that the document was false, had intended to deceive either:
– to use the false document to obtain or
– that the false document to be used or acted on as genuine
What is the definition of the word loss caused by deception
Loss must be in the nature of a direct loss.
Indirect losses, in such expectation loss loss of the bargain and loss of anticipated future profits are not included
To prove the charge of theft by a person in a relationship under section 220(1), it is necessary to prove that the person knew they had to
Account to any other person for the property, or for any proceeds arising from the property
In the case of the Morley in NZCA618 to discuss the matter of loss in relation to section 240(1)(B) crimes act 1961 causing loss by deception what was held in this matter
The prosecution must prove that the loss alleged by the victim must have been induced by, or are caused in reliance, upon the deception
For a charge of under section 240(1)(B) of the crimes act 1961, obtaining by deception, the obligation to repay means
The obligation to repay must be a legally enforceable one
A fraudulent device, truck or stratagem used with intent to deceive any person must be
Fraudulent and morally wrong or fraudulent, meaning dishonest in a traditional sense
False documents include a document of which the whole or in a material part purports to be made by who
– A person who did not authorise it’s making
– a factitious person
The serious fraud office investigators serious or complex fraud complaints. Can investigate it from the office make an arrest of a fraud suspect
Under no circumstances as the investigator does not have powers of arrest
Debt
Means money owing from one person to another
Liability
A legally enforceable financial obligation to pay, such as the cost of a meal
Where person has been induced to part with the goods by deception, what are two steps he can take to void the deceivers title
Communication to the accused. Taking of all possible steps to bring it to the accused notice, e.g. by writing a letter, text, phone calls etc
By advising the place the property has been obtained by fraud
To successfully prosecuted person on the charge of using altered or pre-producing documents with intent to deceive under 259 of CA 61 three elements you must prove
Firstly, the defendant must know that the document has been altered with intent to deceive
Secondly, the defendant must have intended by the employment of the document, or by causing another person to use or rely on it, to obtain by deception any property, privilege, Service, Broker advantage, benefit or valuable consideration or to cause loss to any person.
Thirdly: there must be an intention to acquire or retain the property etc, or to cause loss, by deception
State your understanding in relation to the term – false in a material particular
The prosecution must establish either that the defendant knows or believes has representation and is false in a material particular, Or as reckless as to whether it is false.
A minor detail may amount to a material particular if it is of consequence to the facts of the case
The question is materiality will be assessed objectively
Material particular is not defined and see a 61 and can be given as usual meaning of an important, essential or relevant detail or item
R V Mallett
A matter will be in a material particular if it is something important or something that matters