QnA Flashcards
What is the penatly for attempted murder?
14 years
Define R v Tarei (life support)
The withdrawl of life support is not tretment (116CA61)
To withdraw the life support does not cause death but removes the possibility of extending a persons life through artificial means
Outline S118 CA61 - concealment of a dead body of a child
Everyone who disposes of the dead body of a child in any manner
With intent to conceal the fact of its birth,
Whether the child died before, during or after the birth
Is liable to 2Y imprisonment
Which court does a youth facing a charge of murder or manslaughter appear in
Charges will be held in the high court following the committal process in the youth court
A question of law relating to whether the condition is a disease of the mind is answered by whom?
The judge
What the accused’s state of mine was at the time of the offence is a question decided by whom?
The jury
What was held in R v Kamipeli (intoxication)
It does not have to be shown that the defendant was incapable of forming the mens rea, merley that, becaue of thier drunken state, they did not have the proper state of mind to be guilty.
What is the burden of proof for insanity?
The accused is not required to prove the defence of insanity beyond reasonable doubt, but to the satisfaction of the jury on the balance of probabilities
What is the relevant age of the person who is employed - S153 CA61
U16
Where a charge of infanticide is laid, who decides on the mothers state of mind?
The jury
Section 223(a)(1) Criminal Disclosure Act 2008 - What must the notice include?
The name and address of the witness
OR
If the name and address is not known to the defendant when the notice is given, any matter known by the defendant that might be of material assistance in finding that witness
Before a conviction of manslaughter can be obtained - S150A(1) CA61 - what must prosection prove?
A very high degree of negligence or gorss negligence
Proximity is a question of law decided by whom?
The judge
Written notice of an alibi is to be given to the defendant within how many days?
10 working days
S20 CDA08
Define R v Cox
Consent must be full, volntary, free and iformed, freely and voluntary given by a person in a position to form a rational judgement
As a general guideline, most offences within the CA61 will require an inent (mens rea) of some kind. Outline a defence that would therefore be generally available.
The defence of intoxication will be available to the defence to establish that the defendant did not have the required intent to carry out the offence.
Provide an overview of the culpability of persons involved in suicide pacts
Any survivor of a suicide pact is guilty of being a party to a death if death of another person within the pact ensues.
Outline S25CA61, ignorance of the law
The fact that an offender is ignorant of the law is not an excuse for any offenec committed by him
Proximity relating to attempts
Proximity is a question of law; it is a question that is decided by the judge based on the assumption that the facts of the case are proved.
Outline M’Naghtens rule
Is frequently used to establish whether or not a defendant is insane.
it is based on a persons ability to think rationally, so that if a person is insane they were acting under such a defect of reason from a disease of the mind that they did not know:
- the nature and the quality of their actions or
- that what they were doing was wrong
List four statutory legal duties in respect of the CA61
- provide necessaries and protect from injury
- provide necessaries and protect from injury to your charges when you are a parent or guardian
- provide necessaries as an employer
- use reasonable knowledge and skill when performing dangerous acts such as surgery
- take precautions when in charge of dangerous things such as machinery
- avoid omissions that will endanger life
what is the difference between counselling or attempting to procure murder and conspiracy to murder
counselling or attempting to procure murder required that the offence is to be committed in NZ, whereas with conspiracy to murder, the murder can take place in NZ or elsewhere.
Counselling or attempting to procure murder only applies is the murder is not in fact committed, whereas conspiracy to murder applies regardless of whether murder is committed or not.
When does a child become a human and therefore able to be murdered under S158CA61
159(1) - a child becomes a human being within the meaning of this act when it can completely proceeded in a living state from the body of its mother, whether it has breathed or not, whether it has an independent circulation or not, and whether the navel string is severed or not.
S159(2) - the killing of such child is homicide if it does in consequence of injuries received before, during or after birth.
Define homicide S158 CA61
Homicide is the killing of a human being by another, directly or indirectly, by any means whatsoever
What was held in R v Mane (accessory)
For a person to be an accessory the offence must be complete at the time of the criminal involvement. One cannot be convicted of being an accessory after the fact of murder when the actus reus of the alleged criminal conduct was wholly completed before the offence of homicide was completed.
Ingredients of infanticide
Where a woman causes the death of a child U10, in a manner that amounts to culpable homicide,
and where
At the time of the offence the balance of her mind was disturbed by either
- not having fully recovered from the effect of giving birth to that or any other child,
or the effect of lactation,
or by any disorder consequent upon child birth
to such an extent that she should not be held fully responsible, she is guilty of infanticide and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years.
What does R v Myatt state about an unlawful act in respect of section 160(2)(a) CA61
before a breach of any act, regulation or bylaw would be an unlawful act under S160 [for the purpose of culpable homicide] it must be an act likely to do harm to the deceased or to some class of persons of whom he was one.
What was held in R v Tomars
- was the deceased threatened by, in fear of or deceived by the accused?
- if they were, did such threats, fear or deception cause the deceased to do that act that caused their death
- was the act of a natural consequence of the actions of the accused, in the sense that reasonable and responsible people in the accused position at the time could reasonably have foreseen the consequences
- did the foreseeable actions of the victim contribute in a significant way to his death
In general, no one is criminally responsible for the killing of another by any influence of the mind. What are the exceptions to this rule?
- wilfully frightening a child U16
- wilfully frightening a sick person (mentally or physically)
What is meant by the term justified? Provide 2 examples
when an act is justified the perpetrator is exempt from both criminal and civil liability, eg
- homicide committed in self defence
- homicide committed to prevent suicide or commission of an offence which would be likely to cause immediate and serious injury to the person or property of anyone.
Why is attempted murder hard to prove? R v Murphy
because it must be shown that the accused’s intention was to commit the substantive offence. E.g, must prove actual intent to kill.
What are the ingredients to accessory after the fact to murder
Knowing any person to have been a party to murder
receives, comforts, assists that person or tampers with or actively suppresses evidence against that person
in order to help him to escape after the arrest to avoid conviction.
Define the term suicide pact
a common agreement between 2 or more persons having for its object the death of all of them, whether or not each is to take their own life, but nothing done by a person who enters into a suicide pack shall be treated as done by him in pursuance of that pact unless it is done while he has the settled intention of dying in pursuance of the pact.