QFIP-142-19: Modern Investment Management: An Equilibrium Approach, Ch. 7 Flashcards
Traditional Mean-Variance Optimization Shortcomings
- Academic, but has practical shortcomings
- Very volatile results that are heavily dependent on inputs
- Unconstrained portfolios often have very large long and short positions that might not make intuitive sense
- Heavy reliance on very uncertain parameters. Ater all, if parameters are estimated historically, will the past predict the future?
- One solution is to impose strict caps/floors, but if that is the case, what is the true value of the optimizer?
Black-Litterman model Overview
- The Black-Litterman model is a practical solution to optimization problems
- Typical mean-variance analysis often yields solutions that are very sensitive to model inputs
- For example, a change in expected return of only a few basis points could drastically change the optimal portfolio
- This can be very undesireable
Describe the Black-Litterman Model.
- The Black-Litterman Model uses the global CAPM equilibrium as the center of gravity
- Additional view portfolios are considered, which specify:
- Expected Return
- Level of Confidence / Standard Deviation
- Correlation
- Under certain constraints (e.g. no transaction costs), the Black-Litterman optimized portfolio is a weighted average of the global CAPM equilibrium and the view portfolios
What is the center of gravity for the Black-Litterman Model?
The global CAPM equilibrium
What parameters are needed for the view portfolios in the Black-Litterman Model?
- Expected Return
- Level of Confidence / Standard Deviation
- This parameter sets the level of strength each view portfolio can tilt the optimized portfolio from the center of gravity
- Correlation
State the two reasons why the Black-Litterman model is necessary.
- The Black-Litterman model brings insights concerning the impact of different parameters on optimal weights
- In the real world, one hardly ever optimizes in an unconstrained environment. The Black-Litterman model is great at handling more complex contexts.
Describe the Mathematical Framework of the Black-Litterman Model with K view portfolios
What determines the sizes of the tilts toward the view portfolios in a Black-Litterman model
The sizes of the tilts toward the view portfolios are a function of both the magnitude and the confidence expressed in the expected returns embedded in the investor-specified views.
When is A view portfolio is given zero weight in a Black-Litterman model
- If the portfolio is given no credibiity - so that the level of confidence parameter is set to 0%
- When a view portfolio has a return equal to that implied by a combination of
equilibrium and all other views.
Sources of information in Black-Litterman model
- The Black-Litterman approach assumes there are two distinct sources of information about future excess returns: investor views and market equilibrium
- Both sources of information are assumed to be uncertain and are expressed in terms of probability distributions
Best case use for Black-Litterman model
The real power of the Black-Litterman model arises when there is a benchmark, a risk or beta target, or other constraints, or when transaction costs are taken into account.
Parameter Calibration of the Black-Litterman Model
- Parameter Calibration can vary quite a bit, and is generally up to the modeler
- The expected return and correlation parameters are often handled through historical/empirical estimation
- The level of confidence / standard deviation can be proxied through the amount of data available, although this is just one possible way to calibrate
Describe the Mathematical Framework of the Black-Litterman Model with 1 view portfolio
Black-Litterman formula for expected excess return vector U*
Compare and contrast standard MVO with the Black-Litterman approach
- Both methods provide optimized portfolio weights given a set of constraints
- Optimal weights under traditional MVO are sensitive to small changes in expected excess returns, while Black-Litterman is better behaved
- Traditional MVO portfolios may appear unreasonable without imposing significant constraints such as no shorting, while Black-Litterman does not require these constraints
- In traditional MVO the investor specifies a vector of excess returns, while in Black-Litterman the investor focuses on one or more “view portfolio” weights given a set of constraints