P.W. Botha Flashcards

1
Q

What governmental change happened in 1978?

A
  • Johannes Vorster resigned as prime minister
  • Due to ill-health and financial scandals
  • Replaced by a formidable (cunning and a brute force) opponent, P.W. Botha, who was the Defence Minister previously
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why was ‘Total Strategy’ created?

A
  • Botha was convinced that South Africa was faced with attacks from communists outside the country and within
  • South African armed forces believed this too
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did ‘Total Strategy’ involve?

A
  • Destabilising opposition in neighbouring countries (e.g. Rhodesia, recently decolonised Mozambique and Angola)
  • Limited domestic deforms that ended some measures from ‘petty apartheid’ without giving away political power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What domestic reforms did Botha make in this period?

A
  • 1985 Mixed Marriages Act repealed
  • 1986 Pass Laws abolished
  • Some relaxation of segregation
  • Increased spending on education for blacks
  • Trade unions had more rights
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Botha announce in 1983?

A
  • His intention to create a tricameral parliament for Whites, Coloureds, Indians
  • Blacks were excluded as they already had representation in the ‘homelands’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why was Botha’s proposal in 1983 described as ‘smoke and mirrors’?

A
  • Designed to convince foreigners that South Africa was fully democratic in its own way
  • Fooled no one
  • Too obvious that Coloured and Indian parts of the parliament had no real power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the purpose of Botha’s reforms?

A
  • Focused on providing a good image rather than substance
  • Wanted to preserve as much of the system as possible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What were the consequences of Botha’s reforms for the National Party?

A
  • Negative because the party lost significant support among the white community due to fear for jobs and status
  • Increased growth of opposition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the consequences of Botha’s reforms for the Coloured and Indians?

A
  • Positive on a surface level (some measures of ‘petty apartheid’ were relaxed)
  • Negative because real political power was not granted (low turnout in the first election for new parliament, only 20% bothered to vote)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the consequences of Botha’s reforms for the blacks?

A
  • Benefited to an extent
  • Dice still heavily loaded against them in areas that mattered (i.e. political power)
  • Botha also developed an even more repressive security system
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When did growth of opposition to the regime become clear, and what was an indicator?

A
  • 1987 onwards
  • Began to lose by-elections to the Conservative Party
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why did white extremists oppose Botha’s reforms?

A
  • Fear for their jobs and safety
  • Fear that any reforms, let alone dismantling of Apartheid, would mean a loss of power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the Afrikaner Resistance Movement (AWB)?

A
  • Led by Eugene TerraBlanche, a charismatic orator
  • Created in 1970s as a response to Vorster’s minor reforms
  • Aimed to create a volkstaat (republic), in which only Afrikaners could be citizens
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What were the views and tactics of the AWB?

A
  • Saw the ANC as a communist organisation
  • Recruited thousands of members
  • Actively opposed Botha’s reforms using neo-Nazi style marches, disrupted NP meetings
  • Targeted poor whites to wide support base, supporting food parcels to the needy
  • Tactics of intimidation, violence and murder was used when state of emergency was declared
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What happened in July 1985?

A
  • Botha declared a partial ‘State of Emergency’ in Eastern Cape and Praetoria
  • Then extended to cover whole of South Africa in June 1986
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What happened during the State of Emergency?

A
  • Security forces surrounded townships and arrested teenage activists
  • 8,000 troops were deployed
  • Over 30,000 arrests were made
  • Arrest warrants were not needed and those arrested could be heldy indefinitely without trial
  • Strict censorship was enforced
  • Torture was practices
  • Organisations (e.g. UDF) were banned
  • Security forces shot demonstrators and assassinated political leaders
17
Q

What were the reasons Botha to declare the state of emergency?

A
  • South Africa faced a forthcoming communists attack from outside and within (this was an excuse rather than a genuine reason)
  • Townships were ungovernable because of radical Black nationalist agitators
  • Botha believed that this would allow strict censorship of newspapers, television and radio, to micro-manage news and reduce ongoing negative headlines in the foreign press
18
Q

How long did the State of Emergency last for?

A
  • 5 years
  • 1985-1990
19
Q

What were the consequences of the state of emergency for the apartheid regime in the short term?

A
  • Successful
  • Mass arrests weakened opposition as the leaders were forced to go into hiding, in which communication was difficult
  • Opposition was no match for security forces
  • No future for Blacks in acts of random political violence in townships
20
Q

What were the consequences of the state of emergency for the apartheid regime in the long term?

A
  • Harmful
  • Dramatised to the world that it’s sole solution to things was brute force
  • Showed that they had no idea of how to achieve a lasting political settlement other than to protect white power
  • Existing status as a ‘Pariah’ state intensified
21
Q

How did the state of emergency contribute to the dismantling of the regime?

A
  • Gave solid proof that the system had no answers
  • Violence, censorship, dictatorial repression sparked domestic and international resistance
  • Funerals of assassinated opposition leaders became political theatres
  • Foreign investors began to pull out in large numbers