Purpose Trusts Flashcards

1
Q

How to start a purpose trusts q

A

The rule in Morice v Bishop of Durham; then the justification (Re Astor’s and Bowman v Secular Society), then the 4 exceptions and that they will not be extended

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The four types of permissable purpose trusts

A
  1. Tombs and Monuments - Hooper, 2. Pets - Pettingall v Pettingall, 3. Private masses - Bourne v Keane, 4. Fox Hunting - Thompson
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Monuments

A

Hooper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Pets

A

Pettingall v Pettingall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Private masses

A

Bourne v Keane

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Fox hunting

A

Re Thompson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The exceptions will not be extended

A

Endacott (Homer nodded)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Definition of an unincorporated association

A

Burrell: Two or more people bound together for non business purposes
Mutual rights and duties arising from a contract
Rules as to who controls the funds and how

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Two approaches to how money is held by an unincorporated association

A
  1. Re Recher (absolutely), re Denley (on trust)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Re Recher

A

Money is given as a gift to members to be dealth with according to club rules (but members could change the rules and take all)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Re Denley

A

There is a trust in favour of ascertainable beneficiaries, it happens to be expressed as a purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When could re recher not be applied?

A

In re Grant - gift to conservative party for benefit of the Chertsey HQ. Chertsey had no say in how the money could be applied.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What’s an alternative approach for an inter vivos gift

A

Suggested obiter in Burrell - mandate - agency approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

original approach to division of money from unidentifiable donors on dissolution

A

Re West Sussex - went bona vacantia because could not go to members (they weren’t the intended Bs), money given on contractual basis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Which case distinguished Re West Sussex - what happened

A

Re Bucks - Recher reasoning applied - the money was divided equally between members. BUT if only one member remained it would cease to be a club and would go bona vacantia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Last man standing takes all

A

Hanchett Stamford

17
Q

3 cases on how money shoudl be divvied up

A

Bucks - equally
Sick & Funeral Soc - proportionate to contributions
GKN Nuts & Bolts - according to what’s fair and reasonable

18
Q

Bona vacantia is an absolute last resort

A

Air Jamaica v Charlton

19
Q

What has been the presumption re unidentified donors intent since Gillingham

A

That the donor intents to divest themselves absolutely - in Gillingham it was held on resulting trust but the donors were never found.