Pure Psychiatric Harm Flashcards
What is the general position in relation to pure psychiatric harm?
As with PEL, this is a limited duty situation, so there is generally no duty of care for pure psychiatric harm
What are the general requirements re PPH?
Does not include consequential harm (car accident leading to anxiety)
Only applies to psychiatric harm without physical impact
Two overarching requirements:
1. C suffers medically recognised psychiatric harm (or shock induced physical condition (heart attack, miscarriage)
2. C can satisfy either the primary victim (PV) or secondary victim tests (SV)
What might be a medically recognised psychiatric condition?
PTSD or depression are common examples
How is the primary victim test satisfied?
A primary victim was involved in the incident and:
* was in the actual area of danger; or
* reasonably believed that he was in danger
Risk of physical harm to C must be reasonably foreseeable, but psychiatric harm does not need to be foreseeable
What are the elements of the secondary victim test?
A secondary victim is a witness to an event
Four main elements:
1. Psychiatric injury is reasonably foreseeable – reasonably foreseeable that a person of ‘normal fortitude’ in C’s position would have suffered a psychiatric injury
- Proximity of relationship – must be a relationship with ‘close ties of love and affection’ with the endangered person
- Proximity in time and space – person must be in the incident or immediate aftermath; scene would have to be largely unchanged for this second aspect to apply
- Proximity of perception – C must have witnessed the event with their own senses; not be told about it by a 3rd party or witnessing it on TV
When is a relationship with close ties of love and affection presumed?
Presumptions for parent/child, married partners and fiancé/fiancée
Siblings and other relationships would have to provide evidence to prove this
What is the position with rescuers?
Amateur or professional rescuers must satisfy all parts of the test and aren’t given special status
In other words, there must be:
- A medically recognised psychiatric harm (or shock induced physical condition
- PV or SV test satisfied - Close ties of love and affection aspect unlikely to be met for SV test as a rescuer
If a duty in respect of PPH is established, what further elements are needed to establish negligence?
Breach of duty and causation