Punitive Damages Flashcards
Generally
PUNITIVE: $ awarded punish or deter wrongdoer for outrageous conduct [D focused]
○ Legal ($) remedy = entitled jury trial
○ Discretionary = no right to punitive
TREBLE Damages: 3 (or 2) times compensatory are awarded upon proving violation of law
○ Usually automatic by statute [Might require a showing of malice/gross neg]
Generally awarded in Torts & NOT in Contracts
Qualifying for Punitive Damages
- Parasitic: Must get compensatory [or nominal] damages to get punitive damages
- Claim: Tort; Not K [unless also independent tort]
- Mens Rea: D Malice [intentional] or Conscious Disregard [reckless] NOT mere negligence
- Liability/Vicarious Liability
○ 2 Tests of Vicarious Liability for Punitive Damages
■ 1. Scope of Employment
■ 2. Complicity Rule (Rst Torts)
- Principal authorized act
- Recklessly employed unfit employee
- Manager acts in scope of employment
- Ratified or approved act
When are Punitive Damages NOT Available
D is a municipality or union
Tort reform (29 states)
Statutory Exclusions (ex: not allowed under ADA)
Measuring Punitive Damages
Jury determines initial amount
● Judicial Review for EXCESSIVENESS [shock the conscious? Rational basis?]
● State law factors to decide
● If excessive, remittitur [knock award down, tell P they can accept less or judge will order a new trial]
*EXCESSIVE Review Factors:
● Reprehensibility of D’s conduct
● Ratio: compensatory to punitive → Usually it is a 1:3 ratio
○ Does compensatory award already have a punitive factor? Like loss of consortium, etc.
● Wealth of D (courts usually don’t look at this, as long as the punitive amount is greater than the amount the D would have spent to avoid that action, that is enough to have a punitive effect)
● Other criminal or civil sanctions;
● D’s Profits from illegality
● Other Plaintiffs, more punitives likely on the way
Punitive Damages and Due Process
Due Process Problem → 14th A: state cannot arbitrarily deprive of property or liberty interest
○ Arbitrary Procedure: Procedural Due Process
■ Fair notice of potential penalty to D + Standards to guide discretion (factors)
○ Arbitrary Result: Substantive Due Process
■ Severity, quantity of award is too big = arbitrary
The 3 GUIDEPOSTS
● Punitive Damages must be reasonably necessary to vindicate the states legit interest in punishment/deterrence, otherwise the award would violate due process.
3 Guideposts to determine if violated DP:
○ Reprehensibility (bad faith or reckless disregard)
○ Ratio
○ Other sanctions for similar actions
Ratio of Compensatory Damages to Punitive Damages
Campbell suggests that 4x should be limit of constitutional impropriety
○ Large compensatory award can justify a lower ratio
○ Higher ratio, smaller compensation (e.g., for bed bugs; large punitives upheld)