punishment and victims Flashcards
reduction and retribution
deterrence - punishing the individual discourages them from future offending. making an example of them may also serve as a deterrent to the public at large - thatcher’s government’s short, sharp shock regime in young offenders institutions in the 1980s
rehabilitation - punishment can be used to reform or change the offenders so they no longer offend. providing education and training for prisoners so they are able to earn a living on release, anger management courses
incapacitation - punishment is used to remove offenders capacity to reoffend. imprisonment, execution
retribution - offenders deserve to be punished and that society is entitled to take its revenge in the offender for having breached moral code
durkheim
the function of punishment is to uphold social solidarity
retributive justice - paying back to society. traditional society has a huge collective conscious and so punishment is vengeful and cruel and its motivation is expressive of their collective views.
restitutive justice - restoring things to how they were before the offence. modern society is interdependent on individuals, crime damaged this relationship and so there needs to be some restoration of this relationship, this is done through things like compensation.
marxism
the function of punishment is to maintain existing social order as part of the repressive state apparatus - transporting criminals to colonies in the 18th century
the form of punishment reflects the economic base of society. rusche and kirchheimer - each type of economy has its own corresponding penal system. money fines are impossible without a money economy
melossi and parvani - see imprisonment as reflecting capitalist relations of production:
- capitalism puts a price on worker’s time, so prisoners do time to pay for their crime
- the prison and capitalist factory both have a similar strict disciplinary style, involving subordination and loss of liberty
the changing roles of prisons
since the enlightenment, prison has begun to be seen as a form of punishment itself, where offenders are reformed through hard labour, religious instruction and hard labour
imprisonment may not be an effective method of rehabilitation because 2/3 of prisoners commit further crime on release
prison populations in england has increased since politicians are calling for tougher sentences. new labour government took the view that prison should be used for petty crime as well as serious crime
the era of mass incarceration
garland - in the usa, there are 1.4 million state and federal offenders and 750,000 in local prisons, 3 times more than europe
the impact of high rates of incarceration is that it becomes systematic imprisonment of whole groups - black people make up 33% of the prison population
downes - the ideological function of prisons is to make capitalism look more successful - prisons soak up 30 - 40% of the unemployed
penal welfarism - the idea that punishment should reintegrate offenders into society
transcarceration
the idea that individuals become locked into a cycle of control, shifting between different carceral agencies during their lives
transcarceration can be seen as a product of the blurring of boundaries between the criminal justice system and welfare agencies . health, housing and social services are increasingly being given a crime control role, and they often engage in multi agency working with the police, sharing data on the same individuals
alternatives to prison
community based controls such as probation, curfews and community service are used as alternatives to prison
cohen - argues that this has cast a net of control over people, since the range of sanctions simply enables control to penetrate deeper into society
victims of crime
christie - ‘victim’ is socially constructed. the stereotype of the ideal victim is favoured by the media, public and criminal justice system - a weak, innocent and blameless individual, such as an old woman or child
it is important to study victims because they provide much of the evidence used in the detection of offenders and act as a witness at trials
positivist victimology
miers - identifies positivist victimisation as having 3 features:
- it aims to identify factors that produce patterns of victimisation, especially those that make some individuals/ groups more likely to be victims
- focuses on interpersonal crimes of violence
- aims to identify victims who have contributed to their own victimisation
earliest positivist studies focused on the idea of victim proneness and sought to identify the social and psychological characteristics of victims that make them more vulnerable than non victims
von hentig - identified 13 characteristics of victims such as they’re likely to be female, elderly or mentally subnormal - invites victimisation
wolfgang - studied 588 homicides in pennyslvania and found that 26% involved victim precipitation - victim triggered events such as being the first to use violence
evaluation of positivist victimology
brookman - wolfgang shows the importance of the victim offender relationship, but in many homicides, it is a matter of chance which partly becomes the victim
identifies certain patterns of interpersonal victimisation, but ignores wider structural factors influencing victimisation such as poverty and the patriarchy
can easily tip over into victim blaming. amir’s claim that 1 in 5 rapes are victim precipitated is not very different from saying that victims asked for it
ignores situations where victims are unaware of their victimisation - crimes against the environment
critical victimology
based on conflict theory. focuses on two elements:
- structural factors such as the patriarchy and poverty, which place powerless groups such as women at greater risk of victimisation. mawby and walklate - victimisation is a form of structural powerlessness
- the states power to apply or deny the label of victim - social construct. through the criminal justice process, the state applies the label of victim to some but withholds it from others. when the police decide whether or not to press chances against a man for assaulting a women
tombs and whyte - safety crimes are often explained as a fault of accident prone workers. the ideological function of this failure to label conceals the true extent of victimisation - hides crimes of the powerful
evaluation of critical victimology
disregards the role victim may play in bringing victimisation on themselves such as not making their home secure
valuable in drawing attention to the way that victim status is constructed by power and how this benefits the powerful at the expense of the powerless
patterns of victimisation:
class
the poorest groups are more likely to be victimised. crime rates are typically highest in areas of high unemployment and deprivation
newburn and rock - out of a survey of 300 homeless people, they were 12 times more likely to have experienced violence compared to the general population
patterns of victimisation:
age
younger people are more at risk of victimisation. those most at risk of being murdered are infants under one, while teenagers are more vulnerable than adults to sexual harassment and assault.
the old are also at risk of abuse in care homes
patterns of victimisation:
ethnicity
minority ethnic groups are at greater risk than white people in general, as well as racially motivated crimes
more likely to report feeling under protected, yet over controlled