Public Policy Exceptions Flashcards
The Federal rules of evidence excludes evidence of
Offers to compromise and statements made during compromise negotiations
The Virginia rules of evidence excludes the offer of compromise itself but not
“an express admission of liability, or an admission of independent fact even if made during settlement negotiations
(this only applies to disputed claims)
In Virgina, in any Criminal prosecution alleging personal injury or death, or the attempt of cause personal injury or death can result in
The admission of Relevant evidence of repeated physical and psychological abuse of the accused by the victim “shall be admissible subject to the general rules of evidence”
The Federal rules of evidence provides that a plea of nolo contendre is
Inadmissible in a subsequent civil or criminal case against the person who made the plea
The Virginia rules of evidence provide that a nolo contendre plea is
Admissible in a subsequent civil case arising from the same occurrence
(if D appeals nolo plea in GDC to circuit, then its not admissible because nolo plea is wiped clean under De Novo review)
A nolo plea is not an admission of fact and does not give rise to estoppel
So a P cannot file a motion for MSJ in the new civil suit based on the nolo plea, its not an admission of the underlying facts
In Criminal cases, the Federal rules of evidence allow evidence of other sexual assaults
committed by the D to prove any relevant matter
In Criminal cases for sexual assault, the Virgina rules of evidence only allows evidence
1) Of a defendant’s prior convictions of a sexual offense in
2) In felony sexual offenses involving a child victim