public health Flashcards
3 domains of public health
Health protection, health promotion and improving and organising health services
Health
A state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely absence of disease or infirmity
Incidence
The number of new cases per unit time
Prevalence
The number of existing cases at a particular point in time
Relative risk
Exposed/unexposed
Attributable risk/absolute risk reduction/risk difference
exposed/100 - unexposed/100 = x/100
Number needed to treat
1/attributable risk
Determinants of health
PROGRESS|Place of residence|Race/ethnicity|Occupation|Gender|Religion|Education|Socio-economic status|Social capital/resources
Equality
Equal shares/treatment for everyone no matter their need
Equity (horizontal and vertical)
Equity is what is fair and just|Horizontal - equal treatment for equal need|Vertical - unequal treatment for unequal need
3 types of bias
Selection, information, publication
Selection bias
Sample chosen is not representative of the population you want to generalise to
Information bias
Bias from measurement of either the exposure or outcome
Publication bias
Studies with negative results are less likely to be published
Confounding
A factor associated with exposure and the outcome, which is not on the causal pathway
Bradford-Hill criteria for causality
TDSRC|Temporality|Dose-response|Strength|Reversibility|Consistency
Cross-sectional study
Outcome and exposure measured at same time, looking at prevalence. E.g. survey of a population to see if they have both prev asbestos exposure and asbestosis
Cohort
Take a group of people, follow them up until they reach outcome or study engs. E.g. occupational cohort of people exposed to asbestos, followed up until they get asbestosis
Case-control
Retrospective observational study which looks at a certain exposure and compares similar participants with and without the disease.
RCT
Similar participants randomly assigned to intervention or control groups to study the effect of the intervention
Cross-sectional advantages
Quick and cheap|Few ethical issues
Cross-sectional disadvantages
Prone to bias|No time reference
Case-control advantages
Good for rare diseases|Inexpensive
Case-control disadvantages
Can only show association (not causation)|Unreliable due to recall bias
Cohort advantages
Can show causation|Less chance of bias
Cohort disadvantages
Large amount lost to follow up|Expensive
RCT advantages
Can infer causality|Less risk of bias/confounders
RCT disadvantages
Time consuming and expensive|Ethical issues can interfere
Health needs assessment
A systematic approach for reviewing the health issues affecting a population. Leads to agreed priorities and resource allocation that will improve health and decrease inequalities
Health needs assessment planning cycle
Needs assessment|Planning|Implementation|Evaluation
Epidemiological HNA
Defines problems and size of problem|Looks at current services|Recommends improvements
Epidemiological HNA limitations
Data available may be poor|May be inadequate evidence base|Doesn’t consider felt need
Comparative HNA
Compares services received by one population to another
Comparative HNA limitations
Data available may vary in quality|May be hard to find comparable population|Comparison may not be perfect
Corporate HNA
Takes into account views of any groups that may have an interest e.g. patients, health professionals, media, politicians
Corporate HNA limitations
May be hard to distinguish need from demand|Groups have vested interest - leads to bias|Dominant individuals may have undue influence
Need
The ability to benefit from an intervention. Bradshaw types of need = FENC
Felt need
Individual perceptions of deviations from normal health
Expressed need
Seeking help to overcome variation in normal health