Psychopathology Flashcards
What are the 4 definitions of abnormality?
1- statistical deviation
2- deviation from social norms
3- failure to function adequately
4- deviation from ideal mental health
Describe statistical deviation
Defining abnormality in terms of statistics- the most obvious way to define anything as ‘normal’ or ‘abnormal’ is in terms of number times it has been observed- any often recurring behaviour can be thought as ‘normal’ and any behaviour different can be thought of as ‘abnormal’ i.e. a statistical deviation
What’s an example of statistical deviation?
IQ and intellectual disability disorder- average IQ is between 85 and 115, only 2% score below 70 which is a normal distribution as majority are clustered around the mean. Those individuals scoring below 70 are statistically ‘abnormal’ and are diagnosed with intellectual disability disorder
What are the evaluation points of statistical deviation?
❌ not everyone benefits from a label: if someone is living a happy and fulfilled life there is no benefit to them being labelled as ‘abnormal’ regardless of how statistically unusual they are for example, someone with a very low IQ e.g. below 70 is not distressed and quite capable of working etc, they would not need a diagnosis of intellectual disability disorder and if they are labelled as ‘abnormal’ this may have detrimental consequences on the way others perceive them and how they perceive themselves too
❌ statistically infrequent characteristics can be positive, for example if an individual’s IQ is over 30, they’re just as unusual as those below 70 but we don’t perceive super intelligence as an undesirable characteristic that requires treatment = serious limitation as the concept of SD cannot be used alone to make a diagnosis
✅real-life applications= all assessments of patients with a mental disorder include some kind of measurement of how severe their symptoms are compared to statistical norms- the example of intellectual disability disorder demonstrates how there is a place for SD in thinking about what are ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’ behaviours and characteristics= SD useful part of clinical assessment, but as discussed, cannot be used alone to make a diagnosis
Describe deviation from social norms
- ‘abnormality’ is based on the social context : when a person behaves in a way that is different from how they are expected to behave, they may be defined as ‘abnormal’. Societies and social groups make collective judgements about ‘correct’ behaviours in particular circumstances- definitions are related to the cultural context , which includes historical differences within the same society e.g. homosexuality is viewed as ‘abnormal in some cultures but not others, and was considered ‘abnormal’ in our society in the past
- norms are specific to the cultures we live in and so there are relatively few behaviours that would be considered universally ‘abnormal’
What’s an example of deviation from social norms?
Antisocial personality disorder (APD), formerly psychopathy, is a failure to conform to ‘lawful and culturally normative ethical behaviours i.e. psychopathy ‘abnormal’ because they deviate from social norms or standards
What are the evaluation points for deviation from social norms?
❌ not a sole explanation of abnormality: the definition has real-life application in the case of antisocial personality disorder so there is a place for for deviation from social norms in thinking about what is ‘normal’ or ‘abnormal’. However, there are other factors to consider e.g. the distress to other people resulting from APD- a failure to function adequately; so in practice, deviation from social norms is never the sole reason for defining abnormality
❌definition is culturally relative: social norms vary tremendously from one community to another and one generation to another. This means that a person from one cultural group may label someone from another culture as behaving abnormally using their standards rather than the standards of the person behaving that way. For example, hearing voices is socially acceptable in some cultures but would be seen as a sign of abnormality in the U.K.- this creates problems for people from one culture living within another culture group
❌ definition could lead to human rights abuse- too much reliance on deviation from social norms to understand abnormality can lead to a systematic abuse of human rights. A historical example of deviation from social norms, drapetomania (black slaves who tried to escape their masters), shows how these diagnoses were only ,ade to cartoon minority ethnic groups. These classifications appear ridiculous nowadays but some radical psychologists would argue that some of our modern categories of mental disorders are really abuses of people’s rights to be ‘different’
Describe failure to function adequately
A person may cross the ‘line’ between ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’ at the point they cannot cope with the demands of everyday life- they fail to function adequately e.g. not being able to hold down a job, maintain relationships or maintain basic standards of nutrition or hygiene
Who proposed signs to determine when someone is not coping and what are the signs? (Failure to function adequately)
Rosenhan and Seligman (1989):
- when a person no longer conforms to interpersonal rules e.g. maintaining personal space
- when a person experiences personal distress
- when a person’s behaviour is irrational or dangerous
What’s an example of failure to function adequately?
Intellectual disability disorder- having a very low Iq is a statistical deviation but diagnosis would not be made on this basis alone- there would have to be clear signs that as a result of this,the person was not able to deal with the demands of everyday life; so intellectual disability disorder is an example of failure to function adequately too
What are the evaluation points for failure to function adequately?
✅attempts to include subjective experience of the individual- it may not be an entirely satisfactory approach because it is difficult to assess distress, but at least the definition acknowledges the experience of the patient is important. The definition captured the experience of many of the people who need help and is therefore a useful criteria for assessing abnormality
❌ difficult to say when someone is really failing to function adequately and when they are just deviating from social norms- for instance, people who live alternative lifestyles such as people who practise extreme sports, could be accused of behaving in a maladaptive way- if we treat these behaviours as ‘failures’ of adequate functioning, we risk limiting freedom and discriminating against minority groups
❌ involves subjective judgement- when deciding if someone is failing to function adequately, someone has to judge whether a patient is distressed- some patients may say they’re distressed but may not be judged as suffering. Unlike statistical deviation which is objective due to quantitative nature. Although,there are methods for making such judgements as objective as possible including checklists such as Global Assessment of functioning scale. Nevertheless, the principle remained that a psychiatrist for example, has the right to make this judgement
Describe deviation from ideal mental health
A different way to look at ‘normality’ and ‘abnormality is to think about what makes someone ‘normal’ and psychologically healthy and then identify anyone who deviates from this ideal
Who listed the 8 criteria for ideal mental health and what are they? (Deviation from ideal mental health)
Marie Jahoda (1958):
- we have no symptoms or distress
- we are rational and perceive ourselves accurately
- we self-actualise
- we can cope with stress
- we have a realistic view of the world
- we have good self-esteem and lack of guilt
- we are independent of other people - we can successfully work, love and enjoy our leisure
There is an inevitable overlap between deviation from ideal mental health and
Failure to function adequately e.g. someone’s inability to keep a job may be a sign of their failure to cope with the pressures of work or as a deviation from the ideal of successfully working
What are the evaluation points for deviation from ideal mental health?
✅ covers a broad range of criteria for mental health- most likely covers the majority of the reasons someone would seek help from the mental health services or be referred for help (if they didn’t possess Jahoda’s criteria characteristics)- the sheer range of factors discussed in relation to Jahoda’s criteria make it a good tool for thinking about mental health
❌ definition may be culturally relative- some of the ideas in Jahoda’s classification of ideal mental health are specific to Western European and North American cultures. For example, the emphasis on personal achievement in concept of self-actualisation would be considered self-indulgent in much of the world because the emphasis is so much on the individual rather than family or community. Such traits are typical of individualist cultures and are therefore culturally specific
❌ definition sets an unrealistically high standard for mental health- very few people will attain Jahoda’s criteria for mental health. Therefore, this approach would see the majority of people as abnormal. But on the positive side, it makes it clear to people the ways in which they could benefit from seeking help to improve their mental health
What are the 3 mental disorders you need to know the emotional, behavioural and cognitive characteristics of?
Phobias, depression, OCD
What explanations do we need to know for the 3 mental disorders?
- behaviourist approach to explain phobias
- cognitive approach to explain depression
- biological approach to explain OCD
What is a phobia?
An anxiety disorder characterised by extreme anxiety and irrational fear of objects or situations. The DSM recognises the following categories:
- specific phobia= phobia of objects or situation
- social anxiety= phobia of a social situation like public speaking or using a public toilet
- agoraphobia= phobia of being outside or in a public space
What are some examples of phobias?
- claustrophobia = fear of small spaces- estimated to affect approx 5-7% of world’s population
- aviophobia = fear of flying
- arachnophobia = fear of spiders
What are the behavioural characteristics of phobias?
- panic (in response to phobic stimulus)- may include a range of behaviours including crying, screaming or running away
- endurance - sometimes may be unavoidable e.g. aviophoboa. Here they may remain in the presence of phobic stimulus but usually experience anxiety
- avoidance- make a conscious effort to avoid coming into contact with the phobic stimulus = can often make it hard to go about everyday life, especially if the phobic stimulus is often seen e.g. public spaces
What are the emotional characteristics of phobias?
anxiety and fear:
- fear is the immediate and extremely unpleasant experience when a phobic encounters or thinks about phobic stimulus. Fear leads to anxiety.
- anxiety: state of emotional and physical arousal- emotions include having worried thoughts and feelings of tensions. Physical changes include increased heart rate and sweating
- emotional response to the phobic stimulus is widely disproportionate to the threat posed e.g. arachnophobes will have a strong emotional response to a tiny and harmless spider
What are the cognitive characteristics of phobias?
- selective attention to phobic stimulus- if a sufferer is exposed to the phobic stimulus, they find it hard to divert their attention away from it e.g. an arachnophobe will find it difficult to maintain concentration on what they’re doing if a spider is in the room
- irrational beliefs- a phobic may hold irrational beliefs in relation to the phobic stimulus e.g. social phobics may hold beliefs like: ‘if I blush people will think I’m weak’ or ‘ I must always sound intelligent’
- cognitive distortions- phobic’s perception likely to be distorted
Who argued that phobias are learned by classical conditioning and then maintained by operant conditioning
Mower (1960)-behaviourist approach to explaining phobias and so behaviour is learned through stimulus-response- Pavlov
What is the name of the model that suggests that phobias are acquired through classical conditioning and maintained through operant conditioning?
Two-process model
What does classical conditioning relating to phobias involve?
- the classical conditioning element involves learning to associate something which we initially have no fear (neutral stimulus) with something (unconditioned stimulus) that already triggers a fear response (fear is the unconditioned response)
- the result is that the neutral stimulus become s a conditioned stimulus producing fear, which is now the conditioned response
how could being bitten by a dog lead to a fear of dogs?
- bitten by dog (unconditioned stimulus) which causes pain/ fear (unconditioned response) could lead to fear of dogs
- dog is neutral stimulus which becomes a conditioned stimulus causing a conditioned response of fear following the bite
Who showed how a fear of rats could be conditioned in an 11 month old boy called ‘Little Albert’?
Watson and Raynor (1920)
What are the before and after stages of conditioning Little Albert?
Before conditioning- whenever Albert played with a white rat a loud frightening noise was made close to his ear- the noise caused a fear response (unconditioned stimulus). The rat (neutral stimulus) did not create fear until the ‘bang’ and the rat had been paired together several times
After conditioning- Albert evolved a fear response (CR) every time he came into contact with the rat (now a CS)
The fear response (CR) is often generalised to other stimuli- what happened in Albert’s case?
Albert showed a fear response to other white furry objects including a fur coat and a Santa Claus mask
How does negative reinforcement maintain phobias?
In the case of negative reinforcement, an individual produces behaviour that avoids something unpleasant and so the avoidance is rewarding to the phobic
- when a phobic avoids the phobic stimulus they’ve successfully escaped fear and anxiety they would be have experienced and this reduction in fear negatively reinforces the avoidance behaviour I.e. avoidance is motivated by anxiety reduction = phobia maintained
Give an example of how negative reinforcement maintains a phobia
If someone has a morbid fear of clowns (coulrophobia) they will avoid circuses and other situations where they may encounter clowns. The relief felt from avoiding clowns negatively reinforces the phobia and ensures it is maintained rather than confronted
What are the evaluation points for behaviourist explanations for phobias?
✅ strength of the two-process model is that it has good explanatory power- two-process model was a definite step forward when it was proposed as it went beyond Watson and Rayner’s concept of simple classical conditioning explanation of phobias. Two-process model explains how phobias are marinated over time, which has important implications for therapy as according to the model, once a patient is prevented from avoiding the phobic stimulus, the phobic behaviour declines; so the application to therapy is a significant strength for the two-process model
❌ there are alternative explanations for avoidance behaviour- in more complex behaviours like agoraphobia (intense fear of being in a public place where it’s felt it may be difficult to escape) there is evidence that at least some avoidance behaviour is motivated by more positive feelings of safety- this explains why some agoraphobics are able to leave their house with a trusted friend, with relatively little anxiety, but not alone = problem for two-process model which suggests that avoidance is motivated by anxiety reduction = model may be too simplistic
❌ model is an incomplete explanation of phobias- even if we accept that classical and operant conditioning are involved in the development and maintenance of phobias, there are some aspects of phobic behaviour that require further explanation- e.g. we easily acquire phobias of things that were a source of danger in our evolutionary past e.g. fear of snakes or the dark; this is the theory of biological preparedness, that we are innately prepared to fear some things more than others. The phenomenon of biological preparedness is a serious issue for the two-process model as it shows that there is more to acquiring phobias than simple conditioning
❌some phobias don’t follow trauma- sometimes phobias appear following a bad experience and so it’s easy to see how they could be the result of conditioning. However, sometimes people develop phobias and are not aware of having a bad experience. For example, very few snake phobics have ever had a traumatic encounter with a venomous snake = phobias in absence of trauma may be better explained by the idea of biological preparedness than the two-process model
❌ two-process model does not properly consider the cognitive aspects of phobias- we know that behavioural explanations in general are orientated towards explaining behaviour rather than cognitive (mental thoughts and processes); this is why the two-process model explains maintenance of phobias in terms of avoidance, but we also know that phobias have cognitive elements. Therefore, the two-process model as a behavioural model of learning does not adequately address cognitive elements of phobias
What are the behavioural approach’s ways of treating phobias?
- systematic desensitisation
- flooding
What is systematic desensitisation?
A behavioural therapy based on classical conditioning which aims to gradually reduce anxiety through counterconditioning (works by eliminating the learned anxious response (CR) that is associated with the feared object or situation (CS) and replace it with another learned response, relaxation)