Psychology Paper 1 Research Flashcards
Normative Social Influence & Informational Social Influence
Deutsch & Gerard (1955)
Little Albert Study
Watson & Rayner (1920)
Stanford prison experiment
Zimbardo (August 1971)
Shock Experiment
Milgram (1963)
Asch Reasearch percentages
75% of participants conformed to group pressure at least once
Cons of asch study
- Artifical situation = experiment has low ecological validity meaning the results cannot be generalised to other settings
- Deception = participants were not aware the other participants were confederates which may have made them feel stupid once they found out
- Participants knew they were in a reasearch study and might have gone along with the demands of the situation (demand characteristics)
- Limited application of findings only Men were tested and women are said to be more likely to conform. They were all from the united states (individualist culture), studies shown in collectivist cultures such as China have shown different results.
Findings only apply to certain situations as participants had to answer out loud which might have influences the results
Perrin & Spencer (1980)
They repeated Asch’s study and found only one student conformed on 396 trials suggesting when Asch’s study took place it was an incredibly conformist time in America and that therefore the study lacks temporal validity. The percentage who confomed may have been lower also due to the fact that the students taking part in the experiment were engineering students who may have been more confident in their answer
Positives of Asch’s study
Laboratory setting meant that variables were heavily controlled which means that the experiment could be replicated/repeated easily and that the influence of extraneous variables could be minimised.
Asch’s study purpose
To see whether individuals would conform to a group’s wrong answer even if the answer was unambiguous
Eagly & Carli (1981)
ASCH = Before the 1970s many psychologists thought that women would be more likely to conform than men. Howvere research by Eagly & Carly in 1981 analysed conformity reserach data and found inconsistencies in sex differences and found that males and females differed the most in studies where audiences created group pressure.
Eagly (1987)
ASCH = Eag;y (1987) believed that men and women show different levels of cobformity because of their different social roles. They said that women are more likely to conform because they dont like group conflict and that men are less likely to conform because they are expected to show independence and assertiveness.
Autokinetic Effect Experiment
Sherif (1935) in CGP textbook page 2, tried to show that people conformed to group norms when they are performing an ambiguous task. Partcipants were influenced by informational social influence.
Klaus & Kennel (1976)
CAREGIVER - INFANT INTERACTIONS = compared mothers who displayed extended physical contact with their babies with mothers who only contacted with their infants during feeding in the three days after birth. After one month, the mothers who displayed greater physical contact were found to cuddle their babies more and make greater eye contact with them than the mother who made less contact. These effects were still evident a year later, suggesting that a greater physical contact leads to an attachment bond that is closer and stronger. Led to the real world effects as hospitals now place mothers and babies in the same room in the days following birth to encourage attachment formation.
Isabella et al (1989)
CAREGIVER - INFANT INTERACTIONS = found that infants with secure attachments demonstrated interactional synchrony during the first year of life.
Meltzoff and Moore (1977)
CAREGIVER - INFANT INTERACTIONS = discovered that infants aged two to three weeks displayed a tendency to mimic adults facial expressions and hand movements, indicating that mimicry is an innate ability that helps in the formation of attachment.
Papousek et al (1991)
CAREGIVER - INFANT INTERACTIONS = found that the use of caregiverese was cross-culturak, suggesting that is is an innate device
Condon & Sander (1974)
Interactional synchrony evidence= aimed to investigate interactional synchrony (turn taking) in newborns and their parents. They took videos of parents talking to their newborns and analysed them frame by frame the behaviour of the newborn was also noted.
Condon & Sander results
They noticed that even newborns co-ordinate their movemtnts and gestures in time with human speech. There was an element of tun taking and the babies seemed to repsond to the one-sided conversation. This study shows that interactional synchrony starts at an early age. Meltzoff and Moore (2977) say this begins as early as two weeks old.
Condon & Sander evaluation
Strengths:
- Ecological Validity = parents and babies in their own environment
- Ethical study
Limitations:
- The behaviour of newborns is open to interpretation e.g. is it a smile or wind
Attachment Big Study
Schaffer & Emerson 1964 = observed babies and their interactions with those around them. They concluded that the development of attachment could be divided ito a number of specific stages. Aim of study was to find the age at which attachments start and how intense these were.
Schaffer & Emerson Method
CGP textbook page 26
Schaffer & Emerson results
between 25 & 32 weeks of afe 50% of the babies showed signs of separation anxiety towards a particular adult usually the mother this is called a specific attachment.
By the age of 40 weeks 80% of the babies had a specific attachment and almost 30% displayed multiple attachments
Schaffer & Emerson Evaluation
- Because babies were observed in their own homes (a natural environment) we can assume that the study is high in ecological validity; the findings can be generalised to the real world.
- Data was collected by direct observation by the mother. This could have been prone to bias and inaccuracy.
- There were large individual differences when attachments formed. This added uncertainty to the process of attachment formation being exclusively biological.
Rutter (1995)
proposed a model of multiple attachments that stated that all attachments are of equal importance and attachments combine to help form a child’s internal working model. There is an evolutionary advantage to multiple attachments and it is that if a child loses one of its attachments it still has others to rely on and take its place.