Psychology Flashcards
Define attitude.
- Attitude: a positive or negative evaluative reaction toward a stimulus, such as a person, action, object, or concept e.g. can include behaviour such as healthy eating
- Attitudes influence behaviour more strongly when situational factors that contradict our attitudes are weak
Describe the theory of planned behaviour.
Diagram
Describe cognitive dissonance.
Conflict between 2 opposing beliefs
Resolving dissonance
• Change behaviour: In the case of smoking, this would
involve quitting, which might be difficult and thus avoided
• Acquire new information: Such as seeking exceptions
e.g. “My grandfather smoked all his life and lived to be 96”
• Reduce the importance of the cognitions (i.e. beliefs,
attitudes). A person could convince themself that it is better to “live for the moment”
Changing attitudes
Message more effective if: • Reaches recipient • Is attention-grabbing • Easily understood • Relevant and important • Easily remembered
Describe framing.
Refers to whether a message emphasises the benefits or losses of that behaviour
Loss frame: if you do undertake breast self-examination you may decrease the risk of dying from cancer
Gain frame: if you do use SPF 15 sunscreen, your skin will stay healthier and you may prolong your life
Describe stereotypes and prejudice.
• Stereotype – Generalisations made about a group of people or members of that group, such as race, ethnicity,
or gender. Or more specific such as different medical specialisations (e.g. surgeons)
• Prejudice – To judge, often negatively, without having relevant facts, usually about a group or its individual members
• Discrimination – Behaviours that follow from negative evaluations or attitudes towards members of particular groups
Describe social loafing.
Definition - the tendency for people to expend less individual effort when working in a group than when working alone
More likely to occur when:
• The person believes that individual performance is not being monitored
• The task (goal) or the group has less value or meaning to the person
• The person generally displays low motivation to strive for success
• The person expects that other group members will display high effort
Depends on gender and culture
• Occurs more strongly in all-male groups
• Occurs more often in individualistic cultures
Social loafing may disappear when:
• Individual performance is monitored
• Members highly value their group or the task goal
• Groups are smaller
• Members are of similar competence
Describe conformity.
Factors that affect conformity:
• Group size:
-Conformity increases as group size increases
-No increases over five group members
• Presence of a dissenter:
•-One person disagreeing with the others greatly reduces group
conformity
• Culture:
-Greater in collectivistic cultures
Describe bystander apathy.
5-Step Bystander Decision Process
1) Notice the event
2) Decide if the event is really an emergency
Social comparison: look to see how others are responding
3) Assuming responsibility to intervene
Diffusion of Responsibility: believing that someone else will help
4) Self-efficacy in dealing with the situation 5) Decision to help (based on cost-benefit analysis e.g. danger)
Increasing help behaviour
Reducing restraints on helping
• Reduce ambiguity and increase responsibility
• Enhance concern for self image
Socialise altruism • Teaching moral inclusion • Modelling helping behaviour • Attributing helpful behaviour to altruistic motives • Education about barriers to helping
Describe obedience.
Factors That Influence Obedience:
• Remoteness of the victim
• Closeness and legitimacy of the authority figure
• Diffusion of responsibility: obedience increases when someone
else administers the shocks • Not personal characteristics
Describe group decision making.
Describe leadership and team working.
Groupthink - the tendency of group
members to suspend critical thinking because they they are striving to seek agreement
Group polarization - the tendency of people to make decisions that are more extreme when they are in a group as opposed to a decision made alone or independently
Groupthink Most likely to occur when a group: • Is under high stress to reach a decision • Is insulated from outside input • Has a directive leader • Has high cohesiveness
Leadership and team working
• Newly qualified doctors must recognise the role of doctors in contributing to the management and leadership of the
health service.
• Describe the principles of how to build teams and maintain effective team work and interpersonal relationships with a clear
shared purpose
• Undertake various team roles including, where appropriate, demonstrating leadership and the ability to accept and support
leadership by others
• Identify the impact of their behaviour on others
• Describe theoretical models of leadership and management that may be applied to practice.
Leadership styles
Autocratic or authoritarian style
• Under the autocratic leadership style, all
decision-making powers are centralized in the leader, as with dictator leaders.
• They do not entertain any suggestions or
initiatives from subordinates.
Participative or democratic style
• The democratic leadership style favours
decision-making by the group as shown, such as leader gives instruction after consulting the group. They can win the co-operation of their group and can motivate them effectively and positively.
Laissez-faire or “free rein” style
• A free-rein leader does not lead, but leaves the group entirely to itself as shown; such a leader allows maximum freedom to subordinates, i.e., they are given a free hand in deciding their own policies and methods.
Advantages and disadvantages
Table
Define a medical error.
An error is defined as the failure of a planned action to be completed as intended (i.e., error of execution) or the use of a wrong plan to achieve an aim (i.e., error of planning).
E.g. incorrect diagnosis
failure to employ indicated tests error in the performance of an operation, procedure, or test, error in the dose or method of using a drug.
Nurse-doctor relationships, nurses agree to doctor even if mistake
Causes of medical errors (highest to lowest)
- both system-related and cognitive factors
- cognitive error only
- system-related error only
- no-fault factors only
Diagnostic errors
diagnostic errors — not surgical
mistakes or medication overdoses — accounted for:
- the largest fraction of claims,
- the most severe patient harm (Diagnostic errors more often resulted in death)
- the highest total of penalty payouts
Describe clinical decision making.
Clinicians rarely use formal computations to make patient care decisions in day-to-day practice.
• Intuitive understanding of probabilities is combined with cognitive processes called heuristics to guide clinical judgment.
• Heuristics are often referred to as rules of thumb, educated guesses, or mental shortcuts.
• Heuristics usually involve pattern recognition and
rely on a subconscious integration of patient data with prior experience
There are two systems for decision making
Hot system (system 1) - shout look out!
Cold system (system 2) - override system 1 in illusions
(Look at table)
System 1 often controls our actions automatically but system 2 is blissfully unaware, believing itself to be in charge
Describe confirmatory bias and overconfidence in medicine.
• The tendency to search for or seek, interpret, for alternatives and recall information in a way that confirms one’s preexisting beliefs or hypotheses, often leading to errors
• Is confirmation bias to blame for the
ineffective medical procedures that were used for centuries before the arrival of scientific medicine?
• When evaluating a diagnosis be sure to test
BREXIT vote - if one option, seek info to confirm opinion
Overconfidence in Medicine
• Podbregar and colleagues studied 126
patients who died in the ICU and underwent
autopsy
• Physicians were asked to provide the
clinical diagnosis and also their level of
uncertainty
• Clinicians who were “completely certain” of
the diagnosis ante-mortem were wrong 40%
of the time
Describe the Sunk Cost Fallacy.
• Sunk costs are any costs that have been spent on a project that are
irretrievable ranging including anything from money spent building a house to expensive drugs used to treat a patient with a rare disease.
• Rationally the only factor affecting future action should be the future costs/benefit ratio but humans do not always act rationally and often the more we have invested in the past the more we are prepared to invest in a
problem in the future, this is known as the Sunk Cost Fallacy.
• Bornstein et al (1999) found that medical residents’ evaluation of treatment decisions were not influenced by the amount of time and/or money that had already been invested in treating a patient.
• However, the residents did demonstrate a sunk-cost effect in evaluating non-medical situations.
E.g. waiting for lift for long and wont use stairs because already waiting a while
Describe anchoring.
- Individuals poor at adjusting estimates from a given starting point (probs. & values)
- Adjustments crude & imprecise
- Anchored by starting point
- A working diagnosis of acute pancreatitis may seem quite reasonable in a 60-yr-old man who has epigastric pain and nausea, who is sitting forward clutching his abdomen
- However, the patient states that he has had no alcohol in many years and investigations show normal blood levels of pancreatic enzymes
- Clinicians may simply dismiss or excuse conflicting data (eg, the patient is lying, his pancreas is burned out, the laboratory made a mistake)