Psychology 2 - Social Influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is social influence?

A

The effect that other people have on our behaviour

This includes conformity, social loafing and obedience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is conformity?

A

A change in a person’s behaviour or opinions as the result of group pressure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Give a study on conformity

A

Sherif (1935)

To discover the effect of judgement of listening to other people

He asked participants to estimate how far a spot of light moved when they were sitting in an otherwise completely dark room. In fact, the light didn’t move at all but owing to an optical illusion, it did appear to

Individually, the participants gave a variety of estimates which differed quite widely from each other’s. However, when they undertook the same task in groups of three, the estimates were more similar

The participants used other people’s opinions to help them form a judgement in an ambiguous situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Evaluate the conformity study

A

The situation was ambiguous because the distance the light moved was not known by the participants, so this did not demonstrate conformity
Lacks ecological validity because study took place in a laboratory setting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is obedience?

A

Following the orders of someone we believe to have authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Give a study on obedience

A

Bickman (1974)

To see if people would be more likely to obey an order if it came from somebody in uniform

He had actors dress as either a security guard or just in a casual jacket. They asked people in a park to pick up litter

He found that 80% of people who obeyed the “guard” compared with 40% when the casual jacket was worn

Wearing a uniform will increase the sense that a person is a legitimate authority figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Evaluate the obedience study

A

Has ecological validity because participants didn’t realise they were part of an experiment
They could have picked up the litter when the guard was there because they feared what the guard could do if they did not pick up the litter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is socialisation?

A

A reason for obedience where people naturally obey authority figures because they have grown up doing this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a buffer?

A

Something like a wall that stops the teacher from seeing the consequences of their actions on the learner
It is a reason for obedience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is deindividuation?

A

The state of losing our sense of individuality and becoming less aware of our own responsibility for our actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Give a study on deindividuation

A

Zimbardo (1969)

To see if people in a big city behave in a more antisocial way than people in a small town

He parked a car in each place with its bonnet up, as if it had broken down, and observed what people did as they passed by

In New York, people immediately stole all of the parts of the car but in Palo Alto, the only time that the car was touched was when the bonnet was lowered to stop the engine getting wet when it was raining

The deindividuation caused by living in a big city leads to an increase in antisocial behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Evaluate the deindividuation study

A

This study lacked mundane realism (the situation was not realistic) meaning the participants would behave differently to how they normally would behave
This could simply be because there are many more people in a big city meaning there is a much higher chance that there are people that steal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the 3 causes of deindividuation?

A

Being able to hide one’s identity
Wearing a uniform
Being part of a gang or clearly identifiable group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is social loafing?

A

Putting less effort into sonething when you are with others doing the same thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Give a study on social loafing

A

Earley (1989)

To see if culture makes a difference to social loafing

Participants from the US and China had to complete tasks alone and in groups. The level of social loafing was measured by how much effort was put into the tasks

The US participants reduced their effort when in groups but the Chinese did not

Social loafing does not exist in all cultures. In some cultures, people are prepared to work just as hard for the good of the group even when they do not need to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evaluate the social loafing study

A

Only 2 countries were compared and other cultures could give different results
Hard to measure effort of participants

16
Q

What are the 3 factors that affect social loafing?

A

The size of the group you are with
The nature of the task you are performing
The culture to which you belong

17
Q

What is bystander intervention?

A

When people do nothing to help someone in need of help because there are multiple people present

18
Q

Give a study on bystander intervention

A

Latane & Darley (1968)

To see if people are less likely to react in an emergency when there are others present

Participants sat in a room either alone or in threes while completing a questionnaire. While they were doing this, smoke began coming into the room

75% of those sitting alone told someone in the next 6 minutes but only 38% of those in groups of three did

If there are other people around you, it will make it less likely that you will react in an emergency

19
Q

Evaluate the bystander intervention study

A

It was conducted in a laboratory setting so people could have behaved differently to how they normally would
The fact that no one else was reacting could mean that you might not think what is happening as a problem. This would cause the people in groups to not react

20
Q

What is the diffusion of responsibility?

A

In a group of people, there is less need for the individual to act because someone else is present could also do something

21
Q

Who was Kitty Genovese?

A

In 1964, Kitty was attacked in New York
She was attacked for over half an hour until she was killed
Only after, did someone call the police even though the attack could have been stopped almost straight away if someone had called the police earlier
38 people witnessed the attack and did not act

22
Q

What is altruism?

A

Helping someone without thinking of yourself, sometimes at great cost

23
Q

Give a study into how appearance affects bystander intervention

A

Piliavin (1972)

To see if the appearance of the victim would influence helping behaviour

Piliavin had an actor pretend to collapse in a train carriage. His appearance was altered several times and the amount of help he received each time was recorded by an observer

When the victim carried a walking stick, he received help within 70 seconds, 90% of the time. When he had an ugly facial scar, this dropped to 60% and when he acted drunk, it dropped to 20%

The appearance of the person needing help will affect whether and how quickly they get that help

24
Q

Evaluate the appearance bystander study

A

In a train carriage, there are many variables that the researcher can’t control

In 1983, Batson conducted an experiment to show how the characteristics of a victim can have a different sort of impact on whether they receive help or not

25
Q

Give a study into similarities between people and bystander intervention

A

Batson et al. (1983)

To see if the similarity of a victim to a bystander will affect whether they receive help

Participants watched a woman who they thought was receiving electric shocks. Each participants was made to think the woman was either like themselves or not. They were given the opportunity to take the woman’s place in order to stop her suffering

More participants were prepared to take the place of the woman they thought to be similar to themselves than dissimilar

People are more likely to offer help to someone they feel is similar to themselves in some way than to someone they can’t relate to. This is because we have empathy for people to ourselves

26
Q

Evaluate the similarities bystander study

A

The participants were not part of a crowd so bystander intervention doesn’t come into this

People might be helping people similar to them because they thought they were part of their in-group

27
Q

Give a study providing an alternate explanation for bystander intervention

A

Schroeder et al. (1995)

To explore different reasons for bystanders not helping

They studied the findings and conclusions from many previous pieces of research

They were able to provide an alternate explanation for bystander intervention

Bystanders are concerned about victims but when other people are present, they think someone else might be more capable of helping

28
Q

Evaluate the alternative explanation of bystander intervention study

A

This doesn’t support Batson’s study because no one was able to help more easily than anyone else

They were relying on the research and findings of other people which could be wrong