Psychology Flashcards

1
Q

Outline vicarious reinforcement

A
  • reinforcement that works by seeing someone else, usually a role model being rewarded for their work.
  • if this is someone they find as a role model, eg a celebrity, they are more likely to imitate their behaviour.
  • eg positive reinforcement likely will mean that they will imitate their role models’ behaviour
  • this is because the role model’s behaviour is associated with their feelings and outcome of the task.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

State one assumption of the cognitive approach

A
  • the idea that psychology should be focused on studying internal mental processes through models, such as the computer model.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Outline one strength and one limitation of using SLT to explain different attitudes.

A
  • One strength is that it recognises the role of mediational process (ARMM) and the cognitive processes involved in it. This shows that it provides a higher level explanation that just association, and highlights that cognitive processes are involved in imitation behaviour.
  • However, it does ignore biological factors - eg doesn’t take into account if a gene is inherited for attitude, or aggression in boys. Thus, it might be considered reductionist for ignoring the interaction between biology and environment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How might the biological approach explain different attitudes of people?

A
  • inherited genes that may influence cognitive processes
  • balance of hormones - eg boys might be more aggressive than girls due to more testosterone
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Outline and briefly discuss what is meant by cognitive neuroscience (8)

A
  • the idea of studying internal mental processes through analysing the relationship between brain structures and cognitions
  • aims to understand how certain brain areas may contribute more to tasks such as attention, memory, problem solving etc.
  • also aims to understand how neurochemicals may contribute to cognitions - eg dopamine in pleasure and motivation.
  • uses scanning techniques such as f-MRI and PET scans to help discover localisation of certain mental processes - eg the role of the frontal lobe in memory and emotion.
  • good thing is that it is scientific and objective - allows for conclusions to be made backed by imaging data.
  • however it can only establish correlational relationships and cannot establish causal relationships. This show that it cannot reveal the complex mechanisms that go into cognitive processes in real life.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Outline the differences between endogenous pacemakers and exogenous zeitgebers

A
  • EPs are internal biological mechanisms that regulate rhythms - eg the SCN that regulates the 24 hour sleep-wake cycle.
  • EZs however are external cues that regulate rhythms - eg light.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Outline the fight or flight response

A
  • involves a combination of different physiological processes that is triggered by a perceived sense of threat.
  • eg heart beat and breathing rate increases, increasing blood flow to muscles and vital organs needed for potential escape
  • the response is carried out by the CNS - which involves impulses being sent through the spinal chord and back (sympathetic nervous system)
  • Adrenaline released from adrenal glands that can trigger responses like dry mouth and shaky hands
  • This may potentially trigger cognitive thoughts - either heightened ones or making it difficult to put together thoughts and ideas.
  • after threat, Parasympathetic nervous system kicks in, counteracting the F/F response and restoring normal function, inducing a feeling of calmness again.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Discuss research into plasticity and functional recovery after trauma. (16)

A

A01:
- Phineas Gage case study - fact that he suffered such extensive damage to his frontal lobe and recovered with almost full function shows evidence that neuroplasticity was at play - such as axonal sprouting or other parts taking over functions
- Maguire et al - taxi driver case study - found correlation with the time that they had been driving and the size of their hippocampus. Shows that brain may have gone through structural changes to adapt to the demands of navigation - showing that the brain can reorganise itself and its neural circuits to compensate for underutilised areas.
A03:
+: Phineas Gage pioneered our understanding of the fact that the brain can actually repair itself - triggered further research etc. Shows that he was a major contributor to the field
- Case study only provides evidence, not proof, and very specific case, so not generalisable to population.
-: Maguire study very specific to one group of people and demographic, so might not tell us about plasticity in mathematicians for example
-: several factors can affect plasticity and recovery: eg age, education which were not taken into account, so could be considered reductionist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Consider why a repeated measures design is better than and independent groups design

A
  • each participant can participate in both conditions, which makes comparison easier than if it were 2 different groups
  • so effects of individual difference are minimised, so more emphasis can be placed on the conditions rather than differences between pps which might be confounding.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe how counterbalancing works

A
  • a technique used to deal with order effects
  • divide the group in half - lets say group 1 and 2
  • group 1 would first experience condition A, then B
  • group 2 would then experience condition B then A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe how self reported data might effect validity

A
  • could reduce validity (wether the investigation is answering what its supposed to)
  • as pps may lie or make up something, or if it is retrospective, then they may have trouble remembering
  • exaggeration may occur
  • ## social desirability bias might affect accuracy of self reported data.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain one strength and one limitation of quantitative data

A

+: easier to collect and spot patterns, allows for easier comparison as it is numerical data, eg calculating means and Stnd devs.
-: may lack detail and insight, ignoring factors such as stress during experimentation etc. Thus it might result in conclusions being made too quickly without considering individual differences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain one limitation of using range

A
  • takes only 2 extremes of the data into account while ignoring the numbers in between.
  • so better to use the mean or other measures of spread to provide a more accurate understanding of the pattern shown in the data.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain how random sampling would be carried out.

A
  • number each pp from 1- how many ever there are
  • use random number generator online to assign groups/pick pps
  • eg every even number picked goes into group 1 and every odd number goes to group 2, or first eg 10 numbers picked would be your sample.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Give one advantage of random sampling

A
  • not biased, so likely that it will be representative of the entire population. Thus conclusions will be more generalisable to the population.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Suggest how you could measure anxiety levels in participants without using a self report technique.

A
  • measure anxiety with heart rate monitors
16
Q

Suggest an appropriate statistical test that could be used to analyse the relationship between 2 variables. justify your answer

A
  • correlation coefficient
  • because it will allow for the strength of the correlation to also be measured, as well the actual direction of the correlation
17
Q

Explain why research should be peer reviewed

A
  • to ensure credibility and quality of data
  • this might help identify any potential biases in research.
  • enhances reliability of findings
18
Q

Identify 2 ethical issues that could arise in research and address how they can be dealt with.

A
  • Deception
  • in studies where deception might be necessary (eg in Milgram’s study) and where pps knowing reality might distort results, a debrief could be used - explaining that pps will now have the right to withdraw data, and provide opportunities for psychological counselling if needed
  • Confidentiality and privacy
  • could be dealt with by assigning codes to each pp, or referring to them by intials (eg HM)
19
Q

What does the significance level being at the 0.01 level suggest

A
  • that the results do not arise due to chance
  • if results were significant at this level, it would provide enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and suggest that there is in fact a relationship between 2 variables.
20
Q

What is a type 2 error

A
  • when a null hypothesis is accepted even when there’s enough evidence to suggest that there is a difference between population
21
Q

how can you prevent a type 2 error?

A
  • reduce the significance level
22
Q

What are behavioural categories? (2)

A
  • an observational technique where behaviour is separated into more possible components using a tally chart or tick box system.
  • these are operationalised, and prior agreed upon by different observers.
23
Q

Why is it important to use behavioural categories? (2)

A
  • increases inter-rater reliability
  • gives more objective, quantitative data for investigation.
24
Q

Outline 2 studies, 1 by Baillargeon and 1 by Piaget and show how it shows object permanence in infants

A
  • Piaget: blanket covering a toy study
25
Q

Outline one limitation of nominal data

A
  • data collected isn’t very sophisticated or detailed
  • because you don’t have numerical data for each pp.
26
Q

Discuss validity and reliability in terms of classification and diagnosis of Sz. (8)

A
  • reliability in diagnosis can be achieved when different physicians reach the same diagnosis over multiple potential visits.
  • validity comes from the extenet to which Sz is a unique conditions, which is characterised by its symptoms, both positive and negative.
    +:
27
Q

What characteristics have a role in the development of social cognition?

A
  • mirror neurons
  • theory of mind
28
Q

Discuss one or more ethical implications in psychology. Refer to at one or more topics that you have studied in psychology.

A
  • labelling issues
  • eg within the definitions of abnormality, characterising an individual based on a textbook definition might lead to discrimination/ridicule, as they could be considered ‘abnormal’ and be excluded from society.
  • issues with government and policies
  • eg through research into the role of the father having the potential to introduce equal paternity
    AO3:
  • may have genuine positive impacts on society - even if research might be socially sensitive, it can help break stereotypes and bring underrepresented groups (esp in research) to light and better understand their behaviour.
  • cost-benefit analysis - long term consequences need to be weighed up against current costs eg whether the implications to society are worth sacrificing if the research has valuable evidence.
29
Q

Outline and evaluate one study of validity in relation to Sz diagnosis

A
  • Cochrane - increased incidence in diagnosis of people of Afro-Caribbean origin in the UK
  • this increased concern about diagnostic validity - concern about misdiagnosis of general population.
    -: socially sensitive - implications for people with Afro-Carribean origin as it could cause labelling issues/discrimination.
    +: can help come up with solution - awareness of this issue can trigger further research into this area.
30
Q

outline and evaluate one study of reliability in relation to the diagnosis of Sz

A
  • Rosenhan: “being sane in insane places”
    psedupatients faked sz symptoms to get admitted to psychiatric hospital, all diagnosed with Sz on admission
  • showed reliability issues because all physicians made the same diagnosis - even though symptoms were fake.
    +: high ecological validity as done in real world conditions
    -: ethical issues - hospital staff and patients were deceived without any informed consent.
31
Q
A