Psychological Explanations Of Criminal Behaviour Flashcards
How would we explain apparent crime waves?
Genetic make up or personalities, environmental influences, situational factors
Human behaviour is the result of a complex interaction
Each person has a unique collection of attributes- makes them who and what they are
Situations rarely have one dimension
Why do some people commit crime?
Every offender behaves in a idiosyncratic way
Interaction of a large number of complex factors
Not one simple answer to why people commit crime
So single causative factor, naive to think in this manner about offenders
Cannot put individuals into pre-existing typologies
Complex interaction between internal and external factors
Lombroso (1876)
criminals in Italy, criminals different genetic types, physical make-up differences: atavistic, abnormal physiological features
First pioneering attempt on trying to understand why offenders offend, first attempt at typology, differentiate criminals/ non-criminals
Specific, no scientific evidence, only observation, no robust findings, simplistic
Biological theory of deviance says that an individual deviates from social norms largely because of their biological make-up, ferri argued that anyone convicted of a crime should be locked up as long as possible, garofalo said those who violate human universal laws are themselves unnatural
Males as XYY Price (1966) & Jarvik et al (1973)
1960/ 70s - genetic abnormalities
Males as XXY- twice as much maleness- supermale syndrome
XYY males- extreme violence
Lack of scientific rigour, hard to establish XXY but one of the first real attempts to try and look at specific typologies
Osborn & West (1979)
40% of sons born to fathers with a criminal record also gained records themselves
Learnt behaviour, environment and social influence not just genetic
60% sons did not become criminals, could be down to troubled families or the stigma they receive
Twin studies: identical and non-identical
Identical twins are an interest to psychologist because they are genetically identical, genetic transmission of attributes and traits, number of cases where ones twin criminal lifestyle is mirrored by their twin, CR is important.
Starting to see not just bloodline but personality traits
Lange (1931) CR for IT was 77 and non IT was 12
Christiansen (1977) CR for IT was 60 and non IT was 30
Large difference not always found
They are similarly dressed, brought up external, socially influenced to be together, intense relationship, encouraged to be similar, same parenting technique
Walter (1992) identical twins raised separately
Adopted children become similar to their natural or adoptive parents?
Meta-analysis of 13 studies, very few separated, more than a biological drive, not compulsive a genetic link exists, no one person is bought up in a social or environmental vacuum, Behaviour is a complex interaction between internal, individual and environmental factors
Family influences- psychologists have investigated how the family may have influenced an individuals tendency to commit/ not commit a crime
Freud- first 5 years important for personality formation, psychosexual development and traumatic events
Personality formation is built in the first 5 years and difficult to change when not a child, can modify but not change it, if child does not have a good psychosexual development that is why they commit
Bowlby (1953)
Notion of maternal deprivation, inability to form secure/ trusting attachments leads to tendency towards juvenile delinquency
Focuses on mother, who is significant parent ?
Children now have multiple attachments
Farrington (91-97) Longitudinal study of 411 working class boys in London 1953, studies their progression their lifetime, compared boys with a criminal record with those who did not
Showed symptoms of anti-social behaviour i.e aggression.
First attempt to understand offenders, gain insight, give understanding, development of delinquency
How to decrease offending: early intervention programmes for families which show anti-social behaviour, help individuals develop better by getting early intervention for families seen as dysfunctional- parenting classes to re educate parents
Eysenck (1977)
Psychometric measures for individuals, high on both E and N more likely to become criminal, genetic factors were also important, cortical and ANS
High E & N people constantly sought stimulation
If they are a certain personality type they will offend, psychoticism- as long as they are satisfied they are happy, demonstrate extreme behaviours where they work, but successful because can also be this type but they regulate so they don’t commit
Some questions his work that it only applies to intelligent people
Social learning theories, Sutherland (1939) & bandura (1977)
Behaviour stems from individual social learning experiences
Sutherland (1939) accept way of gang, differential associations, what is external to the individual
Bandura (1977) powerful nature of social learning
What are the advantages of Eysenck bio social and XYY?
Eysenck theory was remarkably in its scope. Like some other theories, it was an account of general criminality although he believed that some patterns of personality might be more common in different sort of offenders. His evidence on this was fairly limited but the theory brings together several different levels of theorising.
What are the disadvantages of Eysenck bio social and XYY?
While other theories lack complete support from research findings, Eysenck theory has tended to be seen by many psychologists as based on flawed data. Although the theory is impressive in that it operates at both the biological and social levels, in fact the social input is little more than a matter of rewards & punishment. Sociological approaches for example have little place in the scheme of things.