Psychiatric Injury Key Cases Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

(1) In the zone of physical danger

A

Page v Smith

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

(1) Rescuers will be classed as primary victims

A

Chadwick v British Railway

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

(2) Recognised Medical condition

Paragraph

A

McLoughlin V O’Brien,

“not merely grief, distress or any other normal emotion, but a positive psychiatric injury”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

(3) So long as physical injury is foreseeable there is no need to establish that psychiatric harm is foreseeable

A

Page V Smith

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

(Primary (4) + Secondary (6)) Breach and Damage caused

Paragraph

A

“This has been satisfied in negligence and it would have to be shown that the psychiatric injury would not have happened but for the breach and if so it is clearly not too remote”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

(Primary + Secondary) Remedies

A

Award of damages in the form of compensation to put C back in the position they would have been prior to the negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Secondary victims

(1) Identify that the claimant is a secondary victim

A

Page v Smith

“not in the zone of danger”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

(2) Recognised medical condition

Paragraph

A

McLoughlin V O’Brien,

“not merely grief, distress or any other normal emotion, but a positive psychiatric injury”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

(3) Sudden Onset

A

Sion v HHA

The Psychiatric harm must arise from a sudden impact of witnessing a horrifying incident and must not be gradual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

(4) Threshold test

A

Objective test - is it reasonably foreseeable that person of normal fortitude in C’s position would suffer psychiatric harm?

Bourhill v Young - Does it go beyond mere calamities of life?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

(5) The Alcock rules

A

Close tie of love and affection

Witness at the scene or immediate aftermath

Unaided senses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly