Psychiatric injury Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Part 1.1

A

Recognised psychiatric injuries can be independently verified on the basis of medical evidence. Usually when the V witnesses something outside a normal human experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Part 1.2

A

In rilley v merseyside physical symptoms of fear and panic such as sweating and breathing difficulties were not sufficient to psychiatric injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Part 1.3

A

In hinz v berry feelings of grief and sorrow do not account for psychiatric injury. In this scneario

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Part 2.1

A

In order for the claimant to be successful, they must either be a primary or secondary victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Part 2.2

A

Primary victims are those who are directly affected by the negligent act or omission and suffer psychiatric injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

part 2.3

A

There are 2 types of primary victims, those who are directly involved and rescuers as in dulieu v white. The claimant was successful as they were in the zone of danger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Part 2.4

A

Rescuers are those who put thesmelves in the zone of danger to aid others as in Halve v london

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Part 3

A

secondary victims are those who are able to show close enough ties of love and affection to the primary victim or witness the incident or the immediate aftermath

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Part 3.1

A

The criteria of a secondary victim is underlined in Alock

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Part 3.2

A

Firstly, the victim must show close ties of love and affection to the primary victim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Part 3.3

A

It must be reasonably foreseeable that they would suffer psychiatric injury, for example a child and a spouse as in Mcloughlin v obrian

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Part 3.4

A

A bystander cannot claim for psychiatric injury as in Bournhill v young. They can only claim if its something unbelievably tragic as in Alock. In this scenario

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Part 4

A

Secondly, the secondary victim must have witnessed the event or immideate aftermath as in mcgloughlin v obrian.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Part 4.1

A

It must also be learnt through their own unaided senses meaning they must have heard and seen it. They cannot have witnessed the accident on the TV or through a phone call.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly