Psych Exam 2 Flashcards
3 criteria for Personality Traits
Consistency: home, work, public, private
Stability: stays the same as you age
Individual differences: people have more or less of a trait than others
Idiographic Approach
single, individual personality study; recognition of uniqueness
Look at case studies (smaller scale) & unique experiences
Sees traits as idiosyncratic, not universal (person-centered)
Comparisons may not be possible
Nomothetic Approach
universal personality trait study; establishes generalizations
Sees traits as universal (variable-centered)
Comparison among individuals is possible
Individuality reflected in unique combinations of traits
Single Trait Approach
o What do people with a certain personality trait do?
o Examine correlations between one trait and many behaviors
Many Trait Approach
Who does that important behavior?
Examine correlations between one behavior and many traits
California Q-set Approach
•100 personality descriptions
•Sort into a forced choice, symmetrical, and normal distribution
•Compare characteristics within an individual
-part of many trait approach
Essential Trait Approach
oWhich traits are the most important? Which traits really matter?
oTheoretical approaches to reducing the many to a few:
Murray: 20 needs
Block: ego-control and ego-resiliency
oFactor analytic approaches to reducing the many to a few:
Cattell: 16 essential traits
Eysenck: psychoticism, extraversion, neuroticism
Tellegen: positive emotionality, negative emotionality, constraint
Lexical hypothesis
Idea that important traits become embedded in our language
Led to five major clusters of personality traits, known as the Big
PEN Model
created by Eysenck
Three broad psychological dimensions (psychoticism, extraversion, neuroticism)
Focused on physiological and genetic evidence for his theory
Sixth Factor in the HEXACO Model
honesty/humility
Typological Trait Approach
The structure of traits across individuals is not the same thing as the structure of personality within a person.
Important differences between people may be qualitative.
Myers-Briggs
Used in workplaces, schools, counseling centers, management workshops, etc. Items are choices between two options Four opposing tendencies: •Extroversion (E) vs. Introversion (I) •Sensing (S) vs. Intuition (N) •Thinking (T) vs. Feeling (F) •Judgment (J) vs. Perception (P)
rank-order consistency
people tend to maintain the ways in which they are different from other people of the same age.
Temperament
genetically based behavioral tendencies seen in young children, even babies
Heterotypic continuity
The effects of fundamental temperamental tendencies change with age, but temperament and personality stay the same; behaviors associated with traits change. (Child: becomes upset, kicks someone - Adults: becomes upset, yells at someone)
Active person environment transaction
person seeks out compatible environments and avoids incompatible ones
ex. Aggressive person goes to bar for fights, introvert avoids social gatherings
reactive person environment transaction
different people respond differently to the same situation
Ex. Extravert finds party enjoyable; introvert finds same party unbearable
evocative person environment transaction
aspect of an individual’s personality leads to behavior that changes the situations he or she experiences
Ex. Conscientious person tells group “it’s time to get to work”; disagreeable person starts argument over minor matter
cumulative continuity principle
one’s environment becomes more stable with age
mean level changes
shifts in average scores with age
rank order consistency
Comparing someone to the average person of the same age
Personality has fairly high rank-order consistency, with correlations averaging about r = .50
Conscientious changes
- Dip between ages 10-15ish
- increases between young adulthood and middle adulthood