PSYC 528 - Evidence based Flashcards
Spheres of influence
What: an assessment framework for case conceptualization within the **biopsychosocial **model; the goal is to assess all spheres of influence Used to explore how pts surroundings are influencing themSpheres of influence are factors that influence a client:- self- partner and children- extended family- friends, neighbors, acquaintances- employers, schools, professional acquaintances- government and social networks- interactive network/service providers
EXAMPLE: In order to assess a client’s friends, neighbors, & acquaintances as well as their extended family and partner & children spheres of influence, you might ask things like “How is your social support?” “What would your family say is your biggest struggle?” “Tell me about your work life.” All of these questions are working to uncover how each sphere of influence is affecting the client and the presenting problem.
ADDRESSING Model
Part of: Multicultural and evidence-based practiceWhat: ADDRESSING is an acronym of cultural influences and client factors to be aware of in case conceptualization and treatment. Including these dimensions of identity on intake paperwork can help therapists understand the client more fully and develop more effective, culturally sensitive treatment plans.- AGE and Generational influences (dominant group: young and middle-aged adults; nondominant: children, older adults)- DEVELOPMENTAL Disability (disabled from birth)- DISABILITY (may have developed at any point in lifespan; dominant group: nondisabled people; nondominant: people with cognitive, intellectual, sensory, physical, and psychiatric disabilities)- RELIGION and spiritual orientation (dominant group: Christian and secular; nondominant: Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, and other religions)- ETHNIC and racial identity (dominant group: European Americans; nondominant: Asian, South Asian, Latino, Pacific Islander, Middle Eastern, and multiracial people)- SOCIOECONOMIC status (dominant group: upper and middle class; nondominant: people of lower status by occupation, education, income, or inner-city or rural habitat)- SEXUAL ORIENTATION (dominant group: heterosexual; nondominant: people who identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual)- INDIGENOUS heritage (dominant group: European Americans; nondominant: American Indians, Inuit, Alaska Natives, Aboriginal Australians)- NATION of origin (dominant group: US-born Americans; nondominant: immigrants, refugees, international students)- GENDER (dominant group: men; nondominant: women and people who identify as transgender)Example: Sam is a new client who identifies as a cisgender, Jewish female. She is 68 years old. As her therapist does the initial interview, the therapist will want to gather information about how her Jewish heritage/faith and age are influencing her presenting problems, if at all.
Adjunct Therapy
Part of: Case conceptualizationWhat: A secondary or additional treatment used to complement a primary therapy and maximize the effectiveness of a treatment plan for a client. Adjunct treatments are driven by discovery in case conceptualization and tailored to individual clientsClinical example: A client comes to therapy with symptoms of PTSD from a trauma she experienced as a child. The client discusses that she has tried yoga in the past to help manage some of her symptoms. Knowing this, your treatment plan includes CPT to treat her symptoms of PTSD and you add an adjunct therapy of deep breathing 3x/week.
Case conceptualization/formulation
Part of: effective counseling, evidence-based practice What: Case conceptualization is the process of gathering information about a client, using a framework typically derived from a combination of your preferred theoretical framework, the best evidence available, clinical experience, and patient factors, to organize the information in a way that allows you to develop an effective treatment plan.Why: Careful case conceptualization can guide treatment, enhance the therapeutic alliance, and help both clients and clinicians measure if counseling is progressing towards therapeutic goals.
Clinical example: Jane presents with symptoms of depression including lethargy, anhedonia, weight gain, and frequent crying spells. Her clinician uses a biopsychosocial model to help with the process of case conceptualization. She finds that Jane’s family has a history of depression, that Jane recently moved and has not developed strong friendships in her new home, and often experiences self-shaming thoughts. All of these factors will help guide the clinician’s choices about how to best treat Jane’s symptoms.
Client factors
Part of: case conceptualization, treatment planning, evidence-based practiceWhat: Client factors are aspects related to the client that impact their presenting problem(s) and its presentation. Client factors include multicultural factors, previous experience with therapy, expectations about therapy and therapeutic outcomes, readiness to change, etc.Why: Considering client factors is critical in order to be an effective therapist and one of the three legs of evidence-based practice. They can influence all aspects of the therapy process including therapeutic alliance, treatment planning, case conceptualization.Clinical example:
Common Factors
Part of: all therapeutic approachesWho: Jerome FrankWhat: Common factors are elements of all therapeutic approaches that have been demonstrated to impact the effectiveness of the therapeutic process. Some common factors include the therapeutic alliance, empathy, warm, unconditional positive regard, client resources, expectations. Why: In contrast to the view that the effectiveness of psychotherapy/counseling is best explained by specific or unique factors (notably, particular methods or procedures) that are suited to treat particular problems. Clinical example: Your client comes to her second session and reports that she is thinking about switching to a computer-based program. You let her know that some of the common factors in therapy might not be available in that setting, like the therapeutic alliance, and that these factors are just as important to therapy as the treatment modality.
Efficacy v. Effectiveness Research
What: Efficacy research determines whether an intervention produces the expected result under ideal circumstances. Effectiveness trials measure the degree of beneficial effect under “real world” clinical settings. This is important to know because a trial may show efficacy but may not be translatable to the real world setting.
Example: A study was done researching the relationship between taking vitamin d and depression ratings. Under the controlled setting where confounding variables were minimized, the efficacy was shown to be significant. However, the effectiveness in a real world setting proved to show no significant improvement in depression scores.
Evidence-based practice
Part of: clinical practiceWhat: Based on the medical model of evidence-based practice, EBP includes the integration of the best available research with clinical expertise in the context of patient characteristics, culture, and preferences. The rise of ESTs fueled a debate amongst the mental health field regarding the most effective way to treat patients. Why: Evidence-based practice seeks to incorporate aspects of effective treatment that don’t lend themselves to empirical research with our current knowledge of what specific treatments have been proven to work for specific disorders.
Example: Tara is a therapist who’s evidence-based practice allows her to treat clients in a more individualized way, taking research, her own expertise, and information about the individual client into consideration when determining treatment.
Precipitants of the problem
Part of: case conceptualization/clinical practiceWhat: In a diathesis-stress model of psychopathology, a precipitant is the stressor that activates the diathesis (underlying mechanism that made the client susceptible to psychopathology). Precipitants and problems often overlap.Why: Identifying precipitants of the client’s problems is a key part of cognitive-behavioral case conceptualization. Allows therapists to test hypotheses regarding underlying mechanisms of problems.
Example: Tony comes to therapy because he recently has been experiencing severe panic attacks. He experienced a robbery just a few weeks ago that acted as a precipant to his problem and made his anxiety worse and unbearable.
Outcome measures
Part of: evidence-based practiceWhat: measurable phenomena directly related to a patient’s treatment goals which generally include:- reducing symptoms- increasing positive emotions and behavior- and improving functioningTypically therapists collect outcome measures at the beginning and end of each session as well as over the long-term.Why: Monitoring and measuring patient outcomes allows therapists to assess if the treatment plan is working and make adjustments if it’s not.
Example: Tom is in therapy for his depression. His therapist gives him a quick assessment before each session and at the end of each session to determine if his symptoms are getting better or not.
Origins of mechanisms
Part of: Case conceptualization and evidence-based practiceWhat: a hypothesis that offers an explanation about how a patient learned or acquired the mechanisms that are contributing to their symptoms. Origins can be environmental events, cultural factors, biological factors, or genetics. They differ from precipitants in that they are usually distant rather than recent. Why: Understanding the origins of mechanisms maintaining or creating a client’s problems helps therapists create complete case conceptualizations and develop more effective treatment plans. It also allows them to make connections between different items on a problem list.
Treatment goals
Part of: Case conceptualization and evidence-based practiceWhat: Treatment goals are specific, measurable outcomes developed collaboratively by therapists and patients and monitored over the course of therapy. They provide information about how patients and therapists know if the treatment plan is effective.Good treatment goals are:- explicitly agreed upon by patients and therapists- focused on reducing symptoms and problems- focused on increases desired behaviors or outcomes- emotionally compelling to patients- realistic- measurable- specific- listed in order of priority
Problem list
Part of: case conceptualization/clinical practiceWhat: As part of the pretreatment and assessment, therapist creates the most comprehensive list possible of the clients problems to understand how they fit together, which are the top priorities for treatment, and which treatment might address multiple problems simultaneously. The problem list includes DSM diagnoses, as well as interpersonal, occupational, school, medical, financial, housing, legal, and leisure problems. The problem list should also include information about the severity of each problem, obtained through psychological assessment measure like the BDI when appropriate. The problem list is derived from multiple sources of information, including the clinical interview, assessment measure, structured interview protocols, and other treatment providers. Family members may be useful in this process when treating patients with certain disorders (schizophrenia, bipolar, hoarding).
Mechanisms of action
Part of: case conceptualization and evidence-based practiceWhat: A mechanism of action is how a treatment affects a change for a particular client problem. The reasons why therapy works as they target the mechanisms of the problem. Why: Knowing how treatments affect particular changes helps clinicians so that they can improve hypotheses and treatment planning. Example: Behavioral activation has been working for Sam for his depression because the mechanism of action is that he is receiving positive reinforcement by spending time with friends, which is decreasing his symptoms of feeling isolated.
Treatment monitoring
Part of: Evidence-based practiceWhat: the process of assessing whether or not progress is being made towards mutually agreed-upon treatment goals. Can be informal - therapist making observations about patients symptomology, mood, behaviors, etc. OR can be a more formal process of data collection that therapists use to assess progress and make adjustments to the treatment planFormal treatment monitoring includes consistently tracking, over time, aspects of the process or outcome of therapy in writing or on a computer, using some sort of assessment tool.