PSY3 Eating Behaviour Flashcards
1
Q
Attitudes to food/eating behaviour
**Social Learning: A01 **Parental Modelling
A
- Children acquire attitudes by observing behaviour of their parents
- Parental att. inevitably affect kids
- parents control foods bought/served in home
-
Brown/Ogden outline no. of ways parents exert influence:
- basic food pref
- healthy quality of diets
- concerns of weight gain/disordered eating behaviour
- Parents exert direct role through use of reward/punishment (operant)
2
Q
A02 Parental modelling
A
-
Brown/Ogden - gen. association b/w parents/kids attitudes:
- correlation b/w parents/kids in terms of snack food intake, eating motivations and body dissatisfaction
- Birch/Fisher - found best predictors of daughters’ eating behaviour were mums’ dietry restraint/perception of risk of daughters becoming overweight
-
Hall/Brown - mums influence daughter’s satisfaction/dissatisfaction w/ body:
- mother’s of girls w/ anorexia show greater body dissatisfaction than mums of non-disordered girls
-
Birch - parents directly influence habits through use of praise/reward:
- praise from adult inc. food pref. for previously disliked food
-
but relationship is complex
- manipulating pref. may create unitended conseq/counterproductive
- kids offered juice as a means to be allowed to play showed that using juice as reward reduced pref. for juice (Lowe)
- manipulating pref. may create unitended conseq/counterproductive
3
Q
Attitudes to food/eating behaviour:
A01 Peers
A
- As kids move into wider social world, become inc. influenced by food pref. of friends
- Gladwell/Harris - best way to get a child to eat something new is not by parental encouragement, but immersing child in room of kids who already like that food
- Teen years, children may actively differentiate self from parents/parents’ generation
- Certain foods favoured by teen compared w/ older age groups e.g. pizza, fried foods (Demroy-Luce/Motil)
4
Q
A02 Peers
A
-
Birch - children will eat veg if friends do:
- selection/consumption of veg by pre-schoolers influenced by choices of peers
- children lunched next to kids who pref. different veg to self
- kids showed shift in veg pref. which persisted at follow-up assessment weeks later!
-
Lowe - impact of observational learning shown in intervention study designed to change eating behav:
- kids watched series of DVD adventures feauturing ‘fun/cool’ ‘Food Dudes’
5
Q
A03 Attitudes to food/eating behaviour
A
-
Problems w/ generalisability - studies on clinical/non-clinical population:
- limits degree generalise from one group to another, thus degree to which studies offer understanding of causal factors
- Gender bias - conc. on women’s attitudes
-
male homosexuality risk factor in development of d/o (Siever).
- Findings attributed to male gay subculture - emphasis on lean, muscular body ideal
- limtd view
-
male homosexuality risk factor in development of d/o (Siever).
-
Need to consider other factors - emphasise imp. of ext. factors, underest. contribution of non-psycho exp.
- though may exp. specific likes/dislikes/habits, our basic food pref. determined by evolutionary forces
- humans have strong pref. for nutrient dense foods (meat/fat)
- pref. set in EEA and only moderated by direct experience
- humans have strong pref. for nutrient dense foods (meat/fat)
- though may exp. specific likes/dislikes/habits, our basic food pref. determined by evolutionary forces
6
Q
Explanations for success/failure diets:
A01 Restraint theory
A
- Restraint inc. probability of overeating
- Herman/Polivy developed Boundary Model to exp. why dieting –> overeating
- Hunger - when/how much to eat
- Satiation - occurs when brain judges that eating more not in person’s best interest
- For ancestors, finding food required effort/time, so when person’s eaten optimal amount, brain signals stop, do something to aid survival!
- When food plentiful, satiation reached easily
- don’t need to eat large amounts in single meal as it’s avail in near future
- But reg. bouts hunger indicate uncertain food supply
- brain biochem adjusts to satiation less easily achieved - brain judges that food’s scarce
- When opportunity to comsume arises, org. should consume lots, for it may be while until another opportunity arises
- Dieting widens gap between hunger/satiation
7
Q
A02 Restraint theory
A
-
Wardle/Beale - 27 obese women: women in diet cond. ate more than women in exercise & control group; confirmed model’s predications.
- Strength - assessment under lab cond.
-
Gender bias - research only conc. on success/fail of women’s dieting; studies providing insight only offer limtd exp.
- Not generalisable to opposite gender? Don’t provide universal exp. for reasons of success/failure.
-
Implications for obesity treatment - theory says restraint –> overeating, yet treatment commonly used as solution to exc. weight gain.
- But failed attempts to diet leaves obese depressed/feeling failure
- This is why there may be more emphasis on fitness than diet!
- Ogden - though obesity not necessarily result of overeating, it may be consequence of obesity if restraint used as treatment.
- But failed attempts to diet leaves obese depressed/feeling failure
8
Q
Explanations for success/failure diets:
A01 Role of denial/Ironic processes
A
- Research shows trying to suppress/deny thoughts freq. has opposite effect, making it more prominent (Wegner/white bears)
- A.K.A ‘theory of ironic processes of mental control’ - rep. a paradoxical effect of thought control i.e. denial backfires
- Denial of food tends to make us think of it more than normal; can become pre-occupation
- As food’s denied, it simultaneously becomes more attractive
- Dieter may find only way to deal w/ issue is to succumb to temptation, consume food in question
9
Q
A02 Role of denial
A
-
Practical application - Wegner suggests dieters think of issues differently; rather than thinking “I must not eat” should reformulate challenge to “I must get fit”.
- Ppl may be more successful by focusing on fitness, not diet.
-
Soetens - disinhibited restrained eaters used more thought suppression than unrestrained/low disinhibition, showed rebound effect after (thought of more food)
- Restrained eaters who overeat try to suppress thoughts more often, but when they do, think more of food after
10
Q
A03 of success/failure of diets
A
-
Culturally biased - some cultural grps find it harder to diet successfully due to natural inclination to obesity
- Asian adults more prone to obesity than EU (Park); asian kids/teens have a great central fat mass compared to EU (Misra)
-
Due to lifestyle or genes? - issue to degree which lifestyle determines failure/success
- likely that genetic mechanisms influence weight
- H. levels enzyme LPL associated w/ greater weight gain.
- Researchers believe weight loss activates gene prod. LPL, may exp. why it’s easier to regain lost weight than for one who has never been obese to put on weight
- Determinism plays greater role in success, not free will
- likely that genetic mechanisms influence weight
11
Q
Neural mechanisms in eating behaviour:
A01 Homeostasis
A
- Involves mechanisms which detect state of int. environment/correct situation to restore envrionment to optimal state
- Hunger inc. as glucose levels dec.
- Decline in glucose activates lateral hypothalamus, results in hunger, cause person to search/consume food = levels to inc. again
- Activates ventromedial hypothalamus, leads to feelings of satiation, which inhibits feeding
12
Q
A02 Homeostasis
A
-
Lashley - evidence for role of hypothalamus:
- cut out diff areas of rats brain to see effect of lesions on behavior
-
LH identified as ‘hunger centre’, VMH ‘satiety centre’
- lesions to LH caused animals to stop eating spontaneously
- reverse occurred after lesions made to VMH
- lesions in VMH caused rats to overeat!
- Probs w/ animal studies!!!!
- Limitations - for hunger mechanism to be adaptive, must anticipate/prevent energy deficits, not just react!
- Suggests hunger only triggered when energy falls below desired level
- Incompatible w/ situations in which systems would’ve evolved!
- For mechanism to be adaptive, must promote levels of consumption that maintain bodily resources above optimal to act as buffer against future lack food
- Suggests hunger only triggered when energy falls below desired level
13
Q
Neural mechanisms in eating behaviour
A01 Role of leptin
A
- Fat hormone leptin is an example of a neuropeptide
- Secreted from fat cells into the blood and signals the brain (via the hypothalamus) that calorie availability is high - leads to satiation
- When fat reserves are used for energy production, leptin secretion falls
- hypothalamus detects this, interprets low leptin as lack of calories and generates sensation of hunger
14
Q
A02 Role of leptin
A
-
Zhang - evidence for role of leptin:
- some mice received 2 copies of gene related to leptin regulation (ob/ob)
- have tendency to overeat, esp. foods h. in fat/sugar
-
ob/ob mice have defective genes for leptin regulation
- injecting ob/ob mice w/ leptin causes them to lose weight dramatically
- direct evidence of leptin in human eating behav come from rare cases of ppl born w/ leptin deficiency
- can’t control their eating, freq. become obese - take leptin injections to return to normal weight
- Problems w/ animal research!!!!!
- some mice received 2 copies of gene related to leptin regulation (ob/ob)
15
Q
Neural mechanisms in eating behaviour:
A01 Role of Ghrelin
A
- Ghrelin, **a **neuropeptide thought to be the ‘hunger hormone’
- Produced in stomach and hypothalamus
- Levels inc. before meals as stomach muscle contracts/stretches
- Dec. after meals when stomach’s full
- Receptors of ghrelin found in lateral hypothalamus (brain!), h. levels associated w/ hunger and low levels w/ satiation