PS 230 Intro, Theories, Levels Flashcards
Politics
using power to get people to do things they would not otherwise do (the study of power) + arts/ science of government.
Sovereignty
supreme power or authority. The sole legitimate right to use violence within a given geographic area - no higher power acknowledged.
International Relations #1
Politics in the absence of a common sovereign.
Anarchy
no higher authority (you are sovereign)
International Relations #2
the factors and the activities which affect the external policies and the power of the basic units into which the world is divided (Stanley Hoffmann)
States
Most possess some form of government, must have territorial integrity, must have population (people), must have sovereignty, and states dominate the study of international relations.
Treaty of Westphalia (1648)
It established the principle of sovereignty, it created the principle of non-intervention, created the idea of legal equality among states, created the principle of a binding international treaty, and the treaty recognized the right of the ruler in each land to control their religion for the territory.
Nations
a population that shares identity, usually including a language and culture” (Goldstein)
“a collection of people loyal to each other because of perceived ethnic, linguistic, or cultural affinity” (Mansbach)
-Cultural instead of geographic
-Shares a common identity
Nationalism
“devotion to the interests of one’s nation” (Goldstein)
“the set of psychological, cultural, and social forces that drive the formation of a nation and sustain national identity” (RSK)
Offensive Nationalism
Belief in the superiority of your nation
Defensive Nationalism
Belief in preserving your culture
Nation State
-“synonymous with “state” or “country,” but with the added implication that the subject population identifies itself as a nation”
-A country that has one nation inside of it. Culture and politics are aligned.
Ex: Japan
IGOs
-Inter Governmental Organization
-International groups made up of states
Ex: 1804 Central Rhine Commission
(Increase trade and solve problems on the rhine river)
-Usually there to solve a problem and make something very narrow function
Ex: -United Nations (largest IGO has a global scope) -NATO
NGOS
-Nongovernmental organization
-Do not have states as their membership
-Crossing international borders but no state members
-Redcross, Green Peace
MNCS
Multinational Companies
Businesses that do business in multiple states
-Cross international borders in the business that they do
-Not a government, not individuals.
-British East India Company was first
-Ex: General Motors (GM), Walmart’s, Target, big companies
Why do these IGO, NGO, MNCS, factors engage in IR?
Interest: Want to promote and protect their interest.
Ex: security or medical purposes or rights
Prosperity: Want to make more money and improve.
Prestige: Look and be more powerful and important in the international world.
Ex: North Korea, Iram, ect.
Higher Callings: Promote higher things and advocating for things
Ex: Human rights, democracy, ect.
How do these groups achieve these goals? (IGOS< NGOs, MNCS)
-Diplomacy: Direct official communications between representatives of international actors
-Has to be official approved communication and usually is to solve some sort of crisis
Examples of Diplomacy
Ex: Bargaining, negotiations, threats or promises or statements of resolve
Resolve is all about being credible.
Examples of specific kinds of diplomacy
Ex: Henry Kissinger (worked for Nixon) Shuttle Diplomacy (Israles and Arabs) He played messenger between Saudi Arabia to Israel to Syria since they would not meet.
Nixon focused on Soviet Relations and used Linkage Politics. Nixon linked two separate issues together (an area where he is weak together with an area he was strong) and he would negotiate them together.
Economic Strength
States employ economic strength through Sanctions.
Sanctions
Deliberate government action to inflict economic deprivation on a target state or society through the limitation or cessation of customary economic relations.
Ex: Thou shall not trade x with state x (ex: Cuba sanctions)
Downsides of sanctions
(Sanctions rarely harm the military power of a state ex: North Korea is under many sanctions for a while, but the military is fine, “soldiers well-fed but people are starving”)
How can sanctions have an effect?
Sanctions have an effect if they are threatened, but not imposed. Everyone must participate.
Military Force
Resorting to organized violence to achieve your goals or interests.
Who has a right to employ violence?
only states can result in the use of force. States have a right to employ force.
-States can declare war, corporations cannot. States have the capacity to do this.
Downside to military force
Cost. It is the costliest of options of how to combat an issue, War is very expensive.
When is force successful?
When your state is stronger technologically and physically and materially and has a better economic base. Better morale and motivation from the people give a boost to winning a war. Strategic position is also important to winning a war, where you are placed geographically (ex: U.S. protected by oceans, no big threats, ect.)
Domestic Politics Vs International Politics
IP there is no rule against the use of force. Nothing can stop that. Disputes in IR last hundreds of years
domestically we seem to have a sense of community and understand better. (ex: democrats or republicans are still Americans)
Why should you care about international relations?
- Economics
(Gas cost, Food, Jobs) interdependence - Environment
(Almost all of these issues are IR) - Hazardous to your health
(Wars, Terrorism)
Does the U.S have less reason to care?
Yes, compared to others.
-Geography
Geographic isolation allows us to separate from rest of world and worry less.
-Culture
We left Europe in order to get away and have nothing to do with rest or the world. Why start now when our historical roots are this way?
Results or U.S. having less reason to care
Hard to get the U.S. to go to war.
We need to be attacked or Moral justifications Ex: (Need to defend democracy, protecting human rights, war on terroism )
Elements of social science
description, explanation, prediction, prescription
Description
what do we see? Ex: Trade, Terrorism, war
Explanation
Why?
Hypothesis
Law
Theory
Hypothesis
tentative statement about a causal relationship.
One thing leads to another.
Ex: Why do states go to war? Why do they trade?
What does all good research start with?
The word why
Law
Once a hypothesis has broad support or is deemed correct, it becomes a law.
Does not happen very often.
Theory
Collection of assumptions, laws, and empirical evidence used to explain a phenomenon.
What we build in order to explain why the world works the way it does. The answer to the why?
Theories are NOT truth, but instead stories we tell in order to help us understand complex events.
Why is there terrorism? How does power influence war?
Are theories truth?
No
Are theories simple and narrow?
Yes there is no complexity.
What makes a good theory?
- Theories are interested in central tendencies (trying to explain behaviors on average)
Large number of cases trying to be explained by one theory. - A good theory is progressive and leads to new questions.
- A good theory should be parsimonious (as simple as possible, not hyper complex) least info, but explains the most.
- Clear specification of relationships.
Ex: Increased trade amongst democracies decreases war
Prediction
Known in advance when something will happen
Prescription
What should we do? How can we avoid this?
(ex: predict war, how can we avoid it? Or here’s how you can spread democracy)
Go to policy makers and give them a prescription.
In IR where are we currently?
between explanation and prediction.
Types of theories:
Normative theory, Grand Theory, Partial or Mid-range theory.
Normative theory
Values or value preferences
They will tell you how the world should be. an ideal world.
Grand theory
large theories that try to explain IR as a whole in a broad range.
Partial or Mid-range theory
they focus on one area.
Themes & Characteristics of IR Scholarship
Generality, cooperation/conflict, competing theories
Generality
Central Tendencies
Cooperation/Conflict
(scholars who study cooperation do not mesh together with those who study conflict) Birds of a feather flock together
Competing theories
(Many theories compete to explain phenomena and answer questions, it is up to how you interpret it.) Generally, there is not a single right answer but there are wrong answers.
Paradigm
comprehensive framework for the identification of the variables about which the theory is to be developed.
world view
Idealist/ Utopians assumptions
the environment shapes human conduct
-believed humans are naturally peaceful at heart
moral based
Theories of IR
emphasized how IR should be.
Realism
Direct reaction to idealism
Assumptions of Realism
Human nature is aggressive.
-We’re power seeking and sinful fallen creatures
-We are imperfect, but we are imperfectible
-Our states are rational actors (You look at all your options and choose the one that achieves your goal)
Realist view of anarchy
they see the conflictual and chaos of anarchy continual struggle for power.
Realist on power
the strong will do what they will the weak will do what they must
(Realist) all states are sovereign.
but not equal (power is distributed unequally within the world)
Realism unitary actor
our states speak with ONE voice.
Realism- Domestic politics and ______ are distinct from each other
International relations
-Realist see it as Zero-sum competition
(The more power I have, the less you have)
Realist believe states are
principal actors (Focus on states because they have the power)
Realist believe our states are rational actors
(You look at all your options and choose the one that achieves your goal)
Realists believe we are always trying to maximize
their national interest
Realist dominate issue
National security (keep yourself safe) - big military
Realist measure events based on
safety/ national security
Realist major policy:
balance of power
Realist major thinkers:
Thucydides, Morgenthau, Henry Kissinger
Idealist measure events against
international law
Idealist main concept
national self-determination (all nations should have their own government and get to vote which would elect peaceful governments)
Idealist are
moral based
Idealist major thinkers
Major thinkers- Kant, Woodrow Wilson
Idealist strongly
wanted to create international organizations (IGOS).
Realist rationality
The goal does not matter. We judge how people go about making their decisions.
Realist major policy
balance of power
Realist believed
Give up mortality from politics
Liberalism
Critiques of realism
Liberalism main ideas
-Shifts our focus back to society and cooperation
-Believe Anarchy has order and organization
-Liberals believe that there are norms on how states should behave
-They believe there are Hedgemons that are powerful and vital to IR
Liberalism unitary actor
Liberals like to focus on policies inside a state and say domestic politics matter to international relations.
-Liberals say Supranational actors
(mncs igos) serve a purpose in international relations
Because they provide information
(ex: someone is threatening to attack you, send info to igos, igos investigate state, receive information on what state has or can do to you)
Liberals believe
the rational actor model isn’t important because states are not very good at maximizing their interests.
Liberalism on state preferences
no one preference dominates states . Different states want different things at different points in time. What a state deems to be important can change over time.
Liberalism idea on war
War is not a good tool. War is not a good way to achieve goals.
Liberalism believes humans and nations
Humans/nations are not just self-interested: We can change over time/ We can think about others. Altruism is possible.
Core assumptions of Liberalism:
Primacy of societal actors, Representation and state preferences, Interdependence and the international system
Primacy of societal actors
-The fundamental actors in international relations are individuals and private groups
-They view people as rational and risk averse
-They get these goals by organizing and promoting our differentiated interests
(Join or create groups to help us get what we want) Groups are political parties usually
Representation and state preferences
-State preferences are determined by a subset (small group) of people in society
-The ones that win the domestic battle (election) gets to determine state preferences
-Who wins and loses determines what the states want and what is important to them
Interdependence and the international system
The configuration of interdependent state preferences determines state behavior.
-Ex: what if I want to control Antarctica and so does another state? Will result in fighting
If you want to control it and I do not? We will be peaceful.
Preferences put together determine behavior.
Realism focuses on
power- can you get it?