PS 201 Chapter 5 Flashcards

1
Q

Define Civil Liberties (how are they different from Civil Rights)

A

Civil liberties are legal protections against government interference with or restriction of personal freedoms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Examples of Civil Liberties

A

Freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom of expression, freedom of religion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Civil liberties conflict with civil rights

A

Neither civil rights nor civil liberties are absolute. Significant public interest or competing civil rights or liberties may constrain civil rights (or civil liberties).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The Bill of Rights

A

The Bill of Rights is the first 10 Amendments to the Constitution. It spells out Americans’ rights in relation to their government. It guarantees civil rights and liberties to the individual—like freedom of speech, press, and religion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The first Ten Amendments

A

Amendment 1 Freedoms, Petitions, Assembly
Amendment 2 Right to bear arms
Amendment 3 Quartering of soldiers
Amendment 4 Search and arrest
Amendment 5 Rights in criminal cases
Amendment 6 Right to a fair trial
Amendment 7 Rights in civil cases
Amendment 8 Bail, fines, punishment
Amendment 9 Rights retained by the People
Amendment 10 States’ rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Barron v. Baltimore 1833

A

This court case established the idea that the bill of rights is only applied to the federal government and not the state governments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

14th Amendment
Key definition:

A

Incorporation of Bill of Rights using the 14th amendment and mention of national citizenship to make it so citizens are not subject to state control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Chicago, Burlington, and Quincy Railroad Company v. Chicago 1897

A

a ruling that determined the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment required states to provide just compensation for seizing private property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Gitlow v. New York 1925

A

the first Supreme Court decision applying the First Amendment’s free speech protections to abuses by state governments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Concept of Judicial Interpretation

A

Incorporation happens through judicial interpretation, Judicial interpretation is the process by which judges determine the meaning of laws, constitutions, and other legal documents, up to courts to protect civil liberties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Major vs. peripheral liberties

A

Major: litigated heavily and developed in detail by court (freedom of speech)
Peripheral: parameters have not been fully developed (freedom of assembly)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

First Amendment

A

Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, freedom of press, hold PREFERRED position

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Brandenburg v. Ohio 1969

A

This case helped interpret the first amendment, stating that states shall not impeach on freedom of speech unless it is likely or purposefully used to create lawless action.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Sexually explicit expression
-Relevant supreme court cases

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Lemon test
-Lemon v. Kurtzman 1971

A

“Must have a secular legislative purpose” such as remedial education
“Primary effect must be one that neither advances nor inhibits religion”
“An excessive government entanglement with religion”
Government can assist with religion if it is not promoting or inhibiting religion
Test focuses more the purpose, effect, and entanglement of the government with religion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The Neutrality Test

A

Neutrality test replaced lemon test, rooted out policies that favored religious groups over nonreligious groups

17
Q

Kennedy v. Bremerton School District 2022

A

Created high bar that has endured in broadening the scope of protected speech. Court ruling that protected the coach, saying praying before a game was a practice of freedom of religion.

18
Q

Cantwell v. Connecticut 1940

A

Freedom of religion is incorporated in “the fundamental concept of liberty embodied” in the 14th amendment

19
Q

Espinosa v. Montana Department of Revenue 2019

A

Public funding cannot discriminate against religious schools as part of the Free Exercise Clause

20
Q

Second Amendment

A

right to bear arms

21
Q

Fourth Amendment

A

illegal searches and seizures

22
Q

Katz v. United States 1967

A

The telephone booth is a “constitutionally protected area”.
Govt cannot record conversations on a public payphone.

23
Q

Mapp v. Ohio 1961

A

Extended the exclusionary rule to the states.
Improperly obtained evidence cannot be used in trial.

24
Q

Fifth Amendment

A

Right to a criminal case. Protection from self-incrimination, Congress cannot change Miranda rights but court decisions can

25
Q

Miranda v. Arizona

A

Miranda rights, protects from self incrimination during arrest

26
Q

Sixth Amendment

A

Right to a fair trial. (council and impartial jury)

27
Q

Eighth Amendment

A

Protects against excessive bail, fines, and cruel and unusual punishments.

28
Q

Griswold v. Connecticut 1965

A

The 1965 Supreme Court case Griswold v. Connecticut established the right to privacy as a constitutional right, and it had a major impact on the expansion of privacy rights in later cases Estelle Griswold and C. Lee Buxton ran a birth control clinic in New Haven, Connecticut, and were arrested for dispensing contraceptives to married couples.They argued that the state’s law banning contraception violated their right to privacy.

29
Q

Eisenstadt v. Baird 1972 and Roe v. Wade

A

gave support to feminist and reproductive freedom groups to pursue abortion rights. In 1992, the Court backed away from the first trimester standard and substituted a more ambiguous “undue burden” criterion.

30
Q

Dobbs v. Jackson WHO 2022

A

taking away the constitutional right to abortion, abandoning almost 50 years of precedent, and paving the way for states to ban abortion.