Proximate

Question 1

Polemis

Answer 1

As long as there is some harm foreseeable, even if completely different from type of harm, there is full liability

Question 2

Wagon mound one

Answer 2

In order to be liable the defendant would have to foresee the risk. Foreseeability to the risk test.

Question 3

Wagon mound 2

Answer 3

Same facts as one, broadened the foreseeability of risk test

Question 4

Cardozo

Answer 4

There must be a specific duty. The plaintiff must be within the zone of danger for their to be a duty to her. There is not a duty to every fucking body

The victim must be within the foreseeability of the accident

Question 5

Andrews

Answer 5

Due care is a duty imposed to each person in society to protect in each person in society from unnecessary danger.

The explosion was foreseeable and any injury foreseeable

Question 6

Restatement third

Answer 6

The defendant is liable to plaintiffs harm if the harm arose from within the scope of the danger.