Providers Flashcards
Reasons why a health plan wants to contract with providers (contracting goals)
- Obtain favorable pricing (less than full billed amounts)
- Obtain payment terms that result in UW gain
- Get the provider to agree to provide services to the plan’s members
- Meet service area access standards required by states and Medicare
- Obtain contractual agreement for several clauses required by states and Medicare, where the provider agrees to:
a) Submit claims directly to plan, not member
b) Not balance bill member for any amount above the agreed-upon payment terms
c) Hold harmless the member (for any amts owed by plan)
d) Cooperate w/ plan’s UM program
e) Cooperate w/ plan’s QM program
f) Not discriminate
g) Give plan right to audit billing data
Reasons why a provider wants to contract with a health plan (contracting goals)
- Obtain favorable pricing
- Ensure it will not be excluded from network
- Receive direct payment from plan, avoiding need to collect from patient
- Receive timely payment
- Have plan members directed or steered to it
- Not lose business from steerage away
- Receive defined rights around disputing claims/payments
Capabilities of a well-functioning contract management system
- ID network gaps
- Track recruiting efforts, generate reports
- Generate new contract blanks
- Store copies of different versions of any provider’s contract
- Track and report contract changes for each provider
- Track and manage permissions and sign-offs on contracts
- Store images of signed docs and convert to machine-readable formats
- Support paperless contracting process
- Provide early notifications for recredentialing, renegotiations, etc
- Be searchable
- Analyze potential impact of changes in contract terms
Types of physicians and other professional providers
- PCPs and SCPs
- Hospital-based physicians
- Nonphysician or mid-level practitioners that provide primary care (NPs, PAs)
- Mental health providers (psychiatrist, psychologist, CSW, family therapist, etc)
- Other types (dentists, optometrists, etc)
Contracting considerations for different types of physician groups
- Individual physicians - advantage is direct relationship with physician; disadvantage is effort to maintain relationship is large for just one
- Medical groups - advantage is same contracting effort yields higher # of physicians; disadvantage is that if relationship is terminated, greater disruption in patient care
- IPAs - advantages are large # of providers come along w/ contract, IPA may accept more financial risk, and some IPAs perform network management/credentialing/med management; disadvantages are that the IPA can hold a considerable portion of delivery system hostage to negotiations, and plan’s ability to select and deselect individual physicians is limited
- Faculty practice plans (medical groups organized around teaching programs) - advantage is these programs provide highly specialized care and add prestige; challenges are they tend to be less cost effective in practice styles and are not set up for case management, so care is not coordinated
- IDSs - hospital systems that employ physicians often have substantial negotiating leverage
Elements of a typical physician credentialing application
- Demographics, licenses, and other identifiers
- Education, training, and specialties
- Practice details - services provided, hours, etc
- Billing and remittance info
- Hospital admitting privileges
- Professional liability insurance
- Work history and references
- Disclosure questions - such as suspension from government programs or felony convictions
- Images of supporting documents - such as state license certificate
Types of health care facilities
- Community based single acute care hospitals
- Multihospital systems (gives them negotiating leverage)
- For-profit national hospital companies (much less autonomy)
- Specialized hospitals (children’s, psychiatric, etc)
- Physician-owned single-specialty hospitals
- ACOs - coordinate care for Medicare FFs beneficiaries
- Gov’t hospitals
- Subacute care (SNFs, etc - for prolonged convalescence or recovery)
- Ambulatory surgical centers - handle routine cases
- Hospice - end of life
- Retail health clinics
- Urgent care centers
Types of ancillary services
- Diagnostic (lab, imaging, cardiac testing)
- Therapeutic (PT, OT, ST)
- Rx
- Ambulance and medical transportation services
Non-risk-based physician payment methodologies
FFS
- Straight charges - full billed charges
- UCR - physicians are paid up to the prevailing fee
- % discount on charges
- Fee schedule
- Relative value scale (RVS) - each CPT code has a relative value associated with it called a relative value unit (RVU). Pmt = RVU * multiplier
- Resource-based relative value scale (RBRVS) - each CPT code has 3 RVUs (for procedure difficulty, practice cost, and malpractice insurance cost) and the multiplier is applied to the sum of the 3
- % of Medicare RBRVS
- Special fee schedule or RVS multiplier - for large groups/systems
- Facility fee add-on - when hospital runs clinics or offices used by physicians, commonly adds on a separate fee paid to the facility
- Electronic or online visits
Case rates and global fees - single payment, may be subject to additional outlier fees
Risk-based physician payment methodologies
- Capitation - prepayment for services on PMPM basis
- Withholds - % of primary care capitation that is withheld every month and used to pay for cost overruns; remainder after overruns are paid is returned to PCPs
- Physician risk pools (referral/specialty, hospital/facility, and ancillary services) - plan sets aside money in these separate pools and payments for those services are made from the pools; at year end, any surplus in one pool is first used to offset excess expenses in the others, and remaining funds are paid to physicians
- Risk-based FFS - PCP withholds, mandatory fee reductions (unilateral reduction), and budgeted FFS (max amount that may be spent, or fees get reduced)
Considerations when capitating PCPs
- Capitation is usually used only by HMOs b/c only HMOs can use PCP gatekeeper system
- To determine appropriate capitation, plan must first define all services expected to be covered by cap payment; carveouts should only be used for services not subject to discretionary utilization
- Cap rate for given service = net cost per service (after copays) * expected utilization PMPM
- Capitation payments sometimes vary by age, gender, case mix, geography, practice type, etc
- Behavioral shift - members may alter use of services in response to economic incentives or barriers, such as member cost sharing
Categories of risk accepted by capitated physicians
- Financial risk - actual income placed at risk, such as withholds and capitated pools for non-primary care services
- Service risk - providing higher volume of services than expected for a fixed payment; could become too busy and lose ability to sell services to someone else for additional income
Approaches for paying capitations to SCPs
- Direct capitation to individual physicians or specialty groups
- Capitation to a company that specializes in specific types of care; pmt covers costs from all services related to condition such as inpatient, outpatient, physician, Rx, etc
- Contact capitation - budgeted PMPM capitated pool of money is set up for each major specialty; plan tracks member contacts made by each SCP, and at end of period, the pool is paid out proportionally based on member contacts
Pros and cons of capitation
Advantages for HMO
- Gives provider an incentive to reduce medical expenses and utilization
- Eliminates incentive to overutilize and aligns provider’s incentives with those of HMO
- Plan costs are more easily predicted
- Easier and less costly to administer than FFS
Advantages for provider
- Provides good cash flow, with money coming in at predictable rate and as prepayment
- If physician is effective at managing cost, profit margins can exceed those with FFS
Disadvantages
- No immediate reward when provider performs service since pmt has already been received
- Physician’s success is subject to a lot of luck
- Capitation incentivizes doc to withhold necessary care
Federal regulations affecting risk-based physician payments
- “Significant financial risk” (SFR)
a) Applies to Medicare and Medicaid HMOs with contracts that place physician or medical group at SFR for medical costs
b) Exists in any arrangement where amount at risk for referral services exceeds 25% of potential payments (e.g., withholds > 25%)
c) Stop loss protection must be in place for these providers, covering 90% of cost of referral services that exceed 25% of potential payments - Disclosure requirements - CMS requires disclosure of payment incentive plans to both CMS and to members of Medicare or Medicaid HMO, including type of incentive arrangement and % of total income at risk for referrals
Ways to modify amount paid for hospital case
- Carve-outs - hospitals want to carve out expensive implants or drugs, but this removes incentive for hospital to negotiate prices on these items; payers want to limit # of carve-outs
- Credits - manufacturers provide refund (credit) to facility if implantable device fails or must be removed; facilities need to rebate Medicare for these credits, and payers should secure same arrangement
- Outliers - extra payments if patient’s cost exceeds threshold (usually original payment plus discounted charges)
Types of payment for hospital services
- Charges - straight, straight discount, sliding scale discount (based on volume of admissions)
- Per diems - flat, service-specific, differential by day in hospital (1st day = more $), sliding scale (based on volume of admissions)
- DRGs and Medicare-severity DRGs (MS-DRGs) - MS-DRGs are like DRGs, except payments are adjusted to reflect severity of illness and complications during admission
- Percent of Medicare
- Facility-only case rates - flat payment to facility for defined service
- Capitation - paying hospital on PMPM basis to cover all costs for defined population of members; payment may vary by age, sex, severity
- Percent of revenue - hospital is paid % of premium revenue, subjecting it to bearing full insurance risk
- Ambulatory patient groups and APCs - used for ambulatory facility services
Payment approaches that make a combined payment to hospitals and physicians
- Global capitation - payment is made to single entity for all services, which manages all care
- Bundled payment, package pricing, and global payment - single fee covering all facility and professional services related to a particular episode of care
- Shared savings - non-capitated methodology where cost savings compared to a targeted cost are shared between payer and provider org
Considerations for establishing P4P programs
- Performance is measured based on: structure (support system for care), process (how care is delivered), and outcome
- Program should focus on small set of measures
- Measures should be simple to understand (more likely to be accepted)
- Measures often come from nationally-recognized standards, such as HEDIS data set
- Measures must be translated into achievable goals that can be tied to an incentive payment
- Incentives typically range from 0.4-4% for hospitals and 5-10% for physicians
Types of payment for ancillary services
- Discounted FFS or fee schedule
- Flat rates or case rates
- Capitation
Principles to follow for changing physician practice behaviors
- Relationships matter - physicians acting as medical managers should get to know their practicing peers and approach conversations as respectful colleagues
- Let data speak for itself
- Peers are powerful influencers of physician practice patterns - more likely to change behavior if they can discuss potential changes with peer
- Peer leaders must understand and communicate big picture