Property Terms Flashcards
Property In Rem
Rights good against the world
Property in Personam
bind only specific individuals in relations to specific rights (Contracts. Binds people not things)
Exclusion theory
The right to property is the right to exclude others from things
Bundle of Sticks
Grey - No clear single theory of property. To determine rights need to determine what sticks you have. (exclude; enjoy; use; sell)</p>
Coase theorm
If there is no transaction cost, the initial assignment of Prop. Rights/Liability rights will have effect on the use of resources. Will find it’s own equilibrium.
Coase Assumptions
- No transaction costs (always is transaction costs)
- Can monetize all value(people overvalue their losses)
- People are rational(not true)
A Commons
Land that society in general can access
Tragedy of the commons
since no one owns it, people won’t take care of it because there is no incentive
Anti-Commons
so many property rights that you can’t get anything done
Hinman v. Pacific Air- if invading airspace was trespass
Trespass
Tangible, dealing with possession (taking up space)
Nuisance
Deals with use and enjoyment.
Can be intangible(particles; sound waves; odors)
Law
More tangible discussions (Remedy: Money Damages)</p>
Equity
more Intangibles/fairness issues.
remedy- to do or not do something - injunctions
Private Nuisance
Intentional.
Unreasonable interference with use and enjoyment.
Substantial harm
Property rule
1) Injunctive.
2) Voluntary- no one can take your rights away w/o consent.
3) Price set by owner.
4) Captures subjective value in property.
5) Prevents people from ignoring concerns and just paying for it
Liability Rule
1) Monetary.
2) Forced sale.
3) Price set by gov.
4) solves holdout issue
Types of property
1) Real.
2) Personal.
3) Common
Policy concern with body parts as property
1) could impede medical research.
2) unsanitary.
3) you can give your body away but can’t sell it
Policy concern over contracts for conditions of rights (sold art)
Art is tied to the artist reputation which they want to protect after art is sold.
Owners want to have full ownership.
Removes stick from the bundle</p>
Cultural Patrimony
Property that can’t be owned or sold by an individual. Communal property
Inalienable Property
Things so uniquely linked to person or person-hood that they are not like regular property.
Raden’s theory
We protect and value property differently depending on how connected it is to use personally
Fur Trade example regarding property right creation (raden)
Cost of property rights has to have a prevailing benefit.
As value increases people are more willing to assert property rights( beaver fur trade)
Property Rights
1) Right to Exclude.
2) Right to use and enjoy.
3) Right Destroy.
4) Right to sell
Land
1) Physical boundaries.
2) Trespass - protects person occupying land.
3) Nuisance - protects use and enjoyment.
4) right to evict/eject
Conversion
Taking and using someone’s property. Civil Theft
Asportation
Conversion w/o using it
Detinue
Unlawful detention of goods. Temporary possession
Trover
Using someone else’s property w/o permission, but you don’t take it.
Replevin
Wrongful taking of goods. Only case you actually got your goods back
Trespass to Chattles
Injure or interfere with property
Self help
Ok for personal property but not for real property.
There is a greater propensity for violence to protect your land.
Personal property can be replaced
> Exclusions - Public Accommodations
Historically exclusions had to be reasonable, or reasonable fees had to be charged.
Now covered by title II Lodging; eating; entertainment
Exceptions to the right to exclude
Necessity;
custom;
public accommodations;
antidiscrimination
Exclusions- private land
can exclude anyone at any time for any reason or no reason at all
Necessity rule as exception to exclusion
1) Must be outside of the control of the D.
2) Must be an Emergency.
3) Consent before action is not required
Exclusion if public accommodation
Must be reasonable.
Disruption.
Violation of safety-security etc.
Extension of Title II goes beyond protected class
Fair Housing Act
Can’t discriminate w/ house.
Equal conditions;
can’t discriminate w/ Ads;
Can’t lie about availability
Exceptions to the Fair Housing Act
Houses w/ < 3 people;
Rentals where you live;
religious Orgs and private clubs.
License
a right to use the licencor’s land that is revocable at the will of the licencor.
This revocabilty is the main thing that differentiates it form an easement</p>
Grant
License + Property interest. Non-revocable until after the event takes place
Licenses in regard to land
1) In Personam; revocable at will require refund.
2) typically $ damages.
3) can exist w/o consideration.
No consideration revocable at will; w/ consideration treat like
Abandonment
Intent to terminate ownership through relinquishing all title and possession without burdening another person
Transfer
Promotes autonomy and efficiency.
Right to choose where your property goes.
Two types- gifts and wills
Non-transferable things
Children;
people;
your vote;
trade licenses
Trespass
Physical intrusion- no damage needed.
Protects the right to exclude.
Strict liability.
Statute of limitations longer then Nuisance.
Nuisance
Non physical. Protects use and enjoyment. Must show damage. Court looks at reasonableness and intent. Remedy is typically damages or injuction
public Nuisance
Affects the public at large. Typically brought by the gov.
Can be brought by and individual if it’s a specialized harm.
Locality Rule
St. Helens Smelting - If what you’re doing causes such bad physical damages to land it does not matter where you are it will be nuisance.
Nuisance Per se
Luensmann- if the activity violated a law that the municipality categorizes as a nuisance .
Easements in Gross
Not tied to any particular parcel of land. Tied to the person. i.e. permission to cross land to access river
Easement Appurtenant
One which benefits it’s holder in the use of a certain piece of land. Runs with the land
Servient Tract
Tract that the easements grants rights on
Dominant Tract
Track that the easement attaches to.
Granting rights to it’s owner.
Implied Easement by necessity
Deals with landlocked parcels(usually appurtenant).
Must have common ownership then severed.
Can’t be self inflicted
Implied Easement by Implication
Must show need in order to use your land.
Must be a need so obvious or manifest that it was meant to be permanent.
Common track that was severed.