property rules Flashcards
fee simple absolute
absolute ownership of potentially infinite duration.
“To A” or “To A and his heirs”
can be sold, divided, devised, inherited.
fee tail
“to A and the heirs of his body.”
common law: would pass to lineal blood descendants only, owner had a reversion.
today: creates a fee simple absolute, goes to heirs upon death if intestacy or however T devises.
What is a defeasible fee?
Defeasible fees are fee simple estates of potentially infinite duration that can be terminated by the happening of a specified event.
- fee simple determinable
- fee simple subject to condition subsequent
- fee simple subject to executory limitation
fee simple determinable rule, language creating it, and future interest tied to it
a fee simple estate that terminates upon the happening of a stated event and automatically reverts to grantor.
language: “for so long as”, “until”, “while”, “during”
ex: “To A for so long as the premises are used as an animal shelter”
future interest= possibility of reverter.
fee simple subject to condition subsequent
rule, language to create, future interest
an estate in which the grantor reserves the right to terminate upon the happening of a stated event.
“To A, but if coffee is ever consumed on the premises, grantor reserves the right to take.”
language: provided that, on condition that, but if
future interest: right of entry.
does not automatically revert, O must do something to take property back.
fee simple subject to executory limitation
rule, language to create, future interest
estate that, upon the happening of a stated event, is automatically divested in favor of a third party.
i.e., even if it says but if __ to B, B does not have to take action like a grantor would- it automatically goes to B.
ex: “to A, but if jazz is played, to B.”
future interest is a shifting executory interest- executory interest that divests a transferee’s freehold estate.
restraints on alienation- types and which are permissible
- absolute restraints are void- ex: to A, as long as she doesn’t try to sell.
- partial restraint- restraint linked to a reasonable, time limited purpose
Promissory restraints (a covenants not to sell) are ok if reasonable and partial
Disabling and forfeiture restraints are prohibited. Disabling voids transfer and forfeiture means the grantee will lose title if they try to sell (as shown above)
life estate- rule and accompanying future interest
estate that is measured by the life or lives of one or more people
“To A for life.”
Future interest: reversion in O, or remainder in 3rd party.
life estate pur autre vie- rule and accompanying future interest
“To A for the life of B”
or if a life tenant conveys his/her interest to another person, the transferee’s estate is measured by the life of the original life tenant
future interest- reversion
life tenants and duty not to commit waste
life tenant cannot do anything to injure the interests of a remainderman or reversioner.
life tenant rights
life tenant is entitled to ordinary uses and profits of the land
affirmative waste- natural resources
life tenant must not consume or exploit (PURGE) natural resources unless:
- PRIOR USE i.e. impliedly able to exploit (for mines- if mining on land prior to life estate, at common law the life tenant could mine open mines but only those open. now trend is to allow mining if it was happening prior to the grant.)
- necessary to REPAIR or maintain the land
- GRANTED the right impliedly or expressly by grantor (implied might be by prior
- land is suitable only for such EXPLOITATION
permissive waste
tenant fails to meet his obligations:
- preserve land and structures
- pay interest on mortgage
- pay ordinary taxes
only obligated up to the income from the land.
duty limited to reasonable rental value if none.
ameloriative waste- common law rule vs modern rule
common law: tenant must not engage in acts to enhance property’s value unless all future interest holders are known and consent
modernly- can destroy or alter buildings if market value of future interests diminished and
- remainderman don’t object, or
- substantial and permanent change in neighborhood conditions deprived property in its current form of reas. productivity or usefulness
reversion
future interest arising in a grantor that conveys less than he/she owns. (but not FSSCS or FSD b/c those have right of entry and poss of reverter)
future interests in people other than grantor
vested remainder
contingent remainder
executory interest
remainder
future interest created in grantee that is capable of becoming possessory upon the expiration of a prior possessory estate expressly created in the same conveyance
remainders only follow life estates
vested remainder subject to open
vested remainder created in a class of persons certain to become possessory but subject to diminution (others born later who also share)
ex: to A for life, then to B’s kids. B has 2 kids- C and D. (have to be identifiable people)
indefeasibly vested remainder
created in an existing and ascertained person
not subject to condition precedent.
Not subject to total divestment by condition subsequent
Not subject to partial divestment by others joining the class
has a right to immediate possession when the prior estate ends.
“to A for life, then to B”
(no strings attached)
In a will “to my children” bc will is effective at death and kids at death are ascertained
vested remainder subject to divestment
vested remainder subject to condition subsequent (i.e. it has a string attached)
“to A for life, remainder to B, provided, however, that if B dies before he reaches 25, to C.”
*look for commas following the remainder
contingent remainder
remainder created in unborn or unascertained persons or subject to condition precedent (condition that has to be satisfied before remainderman has a right)
*look for commas before the remainder to identify condition precedent
ex: to A, then if B goes to law school to B
or to A, then to A’s son (and A doesn’t have kids yet)
rule of destructibility of condition remainders
at common law, a contingent remainder was destroyed if it did not vest before or upon the termination of the preceding estate
“To A for life, then to B if he has reached 21”
if B has not reached 21 when A dies (and the life estate ends), B’s remainder would be destroyed at common law.
now, a springing executory interest is created if the contingent remainder hasn’t vested yet.
“To A for life, then, on A’s death, to A’s heirs” what interest does A have?
common law and now
common law- Rule in Shelley’s case. present and future interests merge to give A a fee simple.
today- A has a life estate, O has a reversion (A could have no heirs) and A’s heirs have a contingent remainder (since they are unascertained)
doctrine of worthier title
If the grantor creates a remainder in his heirs, it is invalid and will become a reversion in the grantor
ex: To A for life, then to my heirs.
(DOWT- it is just “to A for life” with O’s reversion)
DOWT yields in the face of contrary grantor intent (i.e. can still create a contingent remainder in your heirs in the example above if you clearly express you want to do that)
common law rule of convenience
class closes whenever any member can call for distribution.
ex: T wills property to W for life, then A’s children. A has 2 kids, B and C. A has another child, D. T dies, E is born, then W dies. After W’s death, A has another child, but only B, C, D, E take.
ex2: T’s will gives property to “A’s children that are 21.”A’s child B is 21 at T’s death. At T’s death the class will close because B can call for distribution.
when any member can call for distribution, then those alive or in the womb at that point can take.
springing executory interest
follows a gap in possession or divests the transferor
(ex: to A, if A goes to medical school- because O holds title until condition satisfied; or “to A for life, then five years after A’s death to B”)
“to A, if he marries.” A has springing exec interest
rule against perpetuities
no interest in property is valid unless it:
-must vest, if at all
-no later than 21 years
-after a life in being at the creation of the interest.
doesn’t apply to: vested remainders, right of entry, possibility of reverter, reversion, gifts from charity to charity
things RAP considers possible for purposes of when interests vest
- people meeting conditions could die
- old people can have babies
RAP and class gifts
if the gift is bad as to any member of the class, it is bad as to all of them.
-ex: to A for life, then to A’s children who are 30. B and C are A’s kids and both above 30, but gift still void because A could have a new child and then die so would not know within 21 yrs if he reached 30
things that violate RAP
- class gift conditioning survival on ages beyond 21
- shifting executory interests (ex: to A, as long as no liquor consumed on premises, then to B.)
- unborn widow issues- to A, then to A’s widow, then their issue
if “but if” language is stricken because of RAP violation, what happens?
there is a fee simple absolute b/c no complete sentence if you just cross out “then to x” so you have to cross off starting at but if
wait and see doctrine
assesses the validity of future interests at the end of the measuring life. (i.e., if they actually vested at that point)
if a disposition violates the rule, a court can reform it in a way that closely matches grantor’s intent and can reduce an offensive age condition to 21.
USRAP
interest must vest within 90 years.
if a disposition violates the rule, a court can reform it in a way that closely matches grantor’s intent and can reduce an offensive age condition to 21.
joint tenancy
an estate held concurrently by several people, with a right of survivorship. the right of survivorship must be clearly expressed or else the deed will be construed as a TIC
identical interests, taken at:
the same time,
by the same instrument (title)
with same right of possession.
how a joint tenancy is severed
- voluntary or involuntary conveyance (mortgages and leases- states split, liens usually don’t sever)
note: even a CONTRACT to sell severs b/c of equitable conversion
if a joint tenancy is severed, a tenancy in common results. if there are 3 original tenants and 1 sells, that person is a tenant in common and the other 2 tenants are still joint tenants. (1/3 and 2/3 JT)
tenancy by entirety
an estate between married partners like joint tenancy
- can only be conveyed by both tenants
- individual spouse cannot convey or encumber
tenancy by entirety- severing
- death, divorce, mutual agreement
- judgment by creditor of BOTH spouses
- one spouse conveying does NOT sever
- one spouse’s creditor’s lien does NOT sever
tenancy in common
an estate held concurrently by several people, with no right of survivorship and each may possess the whole property (can’t claim exclusive possession over a part)
can hold different interests
concurrent estates: contribution for rents and profits
co-tenant leasing all or part of premises to a 3rd party must account to other tenants.
co-tenant has a right to retain profits from own use.
exception: if it’s an exploitation of land (mining, natural resources), must share
concurrent estates: ouster
when one tenant claims an exclusive possession over part or of the tract. the other tenants can sue to regain possession
tenant who ousts others is liable to other tenants for profit.
concurrent estates: effect of mortgages and liens on other co-tenants’ interests
can only foreclose up to the debtor co-tenant’s interest
concurrent estates: contribution for repairs, taxes, mortgages, improvements
repairs- if one person pays more than their share, they are entitled to contribution from other tenants if they notify the others of the need for repairs
taxes and mortgages- can seek contribution
improvements- cannot seek contribution
can one co-tenant gain exclusive control by adverse possession?
No, not unless he ousted the others because co-tenants always share possession and thus not hostile
tenancy for years
lease for a fixed period of time.
the lease ends automatically on the stated day. no notice is needed.
periodic tenancy
- continues for successive periods until terminated by written notice by either party
- automatically renewed until notice is given.
- notice = 1 full period in advance; 1 yr lease- 6 mo in advance
- if no time is stated in a lease, this arises by implication based on when rent is due (ex: ea. mo.)
- if an oral lease (>1 yr) is invalid under SOF, periodic tenancy arises based on rent
what kind of tenancy does a holdover tenant have?
landlord can evict or bind to a new periodic
- if landlord elects to bind him, tenancy measured by the way rent is now paid. (residential)
- commercial tenants: year to year if original lease 1 year or more, month to month if orig lease was less
if notice is given mid month (ex: May 15) for a periodic tenancy, when will the lease end?
June 30 (prior to the start of July period). can only end at the conclusion of a natural lease period.
tenancy at will
- a tenancy terminable at will of either landlord or tenant
- must be created by express agreement that it ends at will b/c courts otherwise presume periodic tenancy based on rent
- termination: notice and reasonable time to vacate
tenancy at sufferance
tenancy where T has held over and landlord has not yet bound the tenant to a new term or began to evict.
in rented premises, who is liable if a third party is injured?
the tenant, even if landlord covenanted to repair. (tenant just might be able to seek indemnification)
tenant’s duties
duty to repair- duty to maintain premises and make ordinary repair (T must repair ordinary wear and tear unless stated otherwise)
duty not to commit waste- removing fixture = waste
fixture
- a once movable chattel that, because of its annexation to realty, objectively shows an intent to permanently improve realty
- if express agreement or removal causes substantial damage it is a fixture
if tenant does not pay ren
Tenant in possession vs out of possession
- in possession: landlord may evict, and recover rent owed
- out of possession: treat failure to pay as an offer to surrender (must send a writing if rest of lease >yr); ignore and hold responsible for rent (minority); relet premises and hold T liable for deficiency (majority rule)
landlord duty to make premises safe- liability in tort
common law: no duty
- Common areas- use reas. care
- Assumed repairs- liable if negligent in repairing (whether by K or agrees to despite not contracting)
- Latent defect- L knows/should know of and that T could not discover by reas. inspection
- Public use- knows/should know of condition; that T may admit public w/o fixing; L fails to fix.
- Short-term lease: L liable for any defect
modern rule: in residential leases landlords do have a duty to residential tenants if LL had notice and opportunity to fix
landlord warranty of habitability
implied in residential leases. nonwaivable.
must be fit for basic human dwelling, and comply with housing codes.
(no running water, no heat in winter)
tenant remedy for breach of implied warranty of habitability
Repair and offset against future rent
Abate rent
Terminate lease and move out
Stay, pay full rent and sue for damages
landlord duty of quiet enjoyment
must not interfere with tenant’s quiet enjoyment and possession of premises
Landlord breach by eviction:
i) Constructive- act or omission by landlord making property unhabitable and tenant’s use is substantially interfered with; gives notice; vacates
ii) Actual- physically excluded from whole by landlord, someone with a greater claim of title, or a holdover tenant.
iii) Partial- physically excluded from part
*no duty to pay rent if evicted from any part. constructive allows P to sue for damages
duty to deliver possession
landlord must put tenant in actual possession of premises at start of lease
(holdover tenant remaining is a breach)
can landlord be liable for constructive eviction for something someone else does?
yes, if it is a tenant and it is a nuisance L permitted. L also must control common areas.
assignment- definition and who is now liable
-complete transfer of the entire remaining lease term
-assignee is now in privity of estate with T and liable for covenants that run with the land
-covenants run if they touch and concern the land (benefit landlord and burden tenant, or vice versa, in respect to their interests in the property). rent runs.
-original tenant is in privity of contract w/ L
Both original and assignee can be liable for rent
sublease- definition and what it means for landlord
- if tenant retains any part of the remaining term, the new tenant has a sublease.
- sublessee is not in privity of contract w/ L
- sublessee not in privity of estate- not liable for covenants
- L can only recover rent from original tenant and look to tenant to perform all other covenants
easement
a grant of a nonpossessory property interest to use another person’s land
affirmative- the holder may affirmatively use
negative- holder may compel the servient tenement to refrain from engaging in activity
(common law- only recognized for Light; Air; Support; Streamwater
-now treated as covenants)
must be express & in writing
appurtenant easement *
The right to use another persons property that benefits the easement holder in the physical use or enjoyment of his own property
must be 2 tracts: dominant (benefited) and servient (burdened tract)
ex: a right of way to enable you to access your land
Benefit will run with the benefited parcel
Burden will not run if the later transferee is a bond fide purchaser who had no actual inquiry record or constructive notice
easement in gross
gives the holder a right to use the servient tenement but does not benefit him in his use of another parcel of land
easements giving a commercial advantage are transferable, but those that do not are not
(ex: can transfer right to place billboards on someone else’s land, but not right to ice skate on their pond in winter)
ways to create an easement
prescription
implied in law
necessity
grant (express)- must be in writing
implied
Divided one tract into two
Apparent and continuous use of servient pre-division
Intent for the use to continue
Reasonably necessary to enjoy the dominant
easement by necessity
Easement implied when
landowner sells part of his tract of land
Conveyance deprives that part access to a road or utility line
Only way to access is over the landowner remaining property
servient tract holder can choose where the easement is located
prescription
continuous use for the statutory period
open and notorious
adverse (without permission)
implied easement b/c of a map
lots sold in reference to a recorded plat or map that also shows streets leading to the lots
terminating an easement
- Estoppel- easement holder makes an oral statement he will abandon and servient estate holder reasonable relies
- Necessity ends (if created by necessity)
- Destruction of servient tract
- Condemnation
- Release- written release from holder of easement to owner of servient estate
- Act of abandonment- physical action by easement holder demonstrating intent not to use (building a fence to prevent use of the easement)
- Merger- servient tract and easement owned by same person, and interest acquired must be equal to or greater than the interest owned
- A has fee simple easement in B’s estate. A has a lease or life estate in servient estate (B) less than easement means easement not extinguished. - Prescription- servient estate holder continuously, openly, adversely interrupts the use for statutory period
license*
- revocable privilege to enter upon the land of another.
- exception- estoppel: irrevocable if licensee invests substantial money or labor
- need not be written.
example of license is a ticket
*oral attempt to create easement creates license; revocable unless estoppel above applies
when does an easement appurtenant pass with the dominant tract?*
the servient tract?
dominant: easement appurtenant passes with the land automatically and need not be mentioned in deed
servient: passes automatically and need not be mentioned in the deed, unless it goes to BFP with no actual or constructive notice
actual notice- actual knowledge
constructive- notice from the visible appearance of the easement on the land OR from the fact that the document creating the easement is recorded in the public records.
(ex: if landowner conveys servient estate by will it passes to the devisee, or by intestacy)
covenant
a promise to do (affirmative) or to refrain from doing something on land (restrictive)
ex: promise to paint house pink, not to build for commercial purposes, not to put up a for sale sign
when does a covenant run with the land- burdened tract
Writing
Intent to run (may be inferred from circumstances, may be explicitly stated)
Touch and concern- must diminish burdened party’s rights, privileges, powers in connection with enjoyment of his land
Horizontal privity- original covenanting parties were connected as grantor/grantee, landlord/tenant, mortgagor/mortgagee
Vertical privity - contract, devise, descent
+
Notice
note: homeowner’s association fees and covenants not to compete do touch and concern
no vertical privity if adverse possession
equitable servitude
writing intent touch and concern notice equitable servitude
no privity required
general or common scheme doctrine
no writing necessary- implied equitable servitude IF
- subdivider or developer had a common scheme for residential development when he began selling the parcels (shown in a recorded plat, oral statements to early buyers, or most deeds having the restriction except a few)
- the person at issue had NOTICE
Can have either actual, inquiry (neighborhood conformity) or record notice
negative restrictions bind all parcels as equitable servitudes