property rules Flashcards
(191 cards)
fee simple absolute
absolute ownership of potentially infinite duration.
“To A” or “To A and his heirs”
can be sold, divided, devised, inherited.
fee tail
“to A and the heirs of his body.”
common law: would pass to lineal blood descendants only, owner had a reversion.
today: creates a fee simple absolute, goes to heirs upon death if intestacy or however T devises.
What is a defeasible fee?
Defeasible fees are fee simple estates of potentially infinite duration that can be terminated by the happening of a specified event.
- fee simple determinable
- fee simple subject to condition subsequent
- fee simple subject to executory limitation
fee simple determinable rule, language creating it, and future interest tied to it
a fee simple estate that terminates upon the happening of a stated event and automatically reverts to grantor.
language: “for so long as”, “until”, “while”, “during”
ex: “To A for so long as the premises are used as an animal shelter”
future interest= possibility of reverter.
fee simple subject to condition subsequent
rule, language to create, future interest
an estate in which the grantor reserves the right to terminate upon the happening of a stated event.
“To A, but if coffee is ever consumed on the premises, grantor reserves the right to take.”
language: provided that, on condition that, but if
future interest: right of entry.
does not automatically revert, O must do something to take property back.
fee simple subject to executory limitation
rule, language to create, future interest
estate that, upon the happening of a stated event, is automatically divested in favor of a third party.
i.e., even if it says but if __ to B, B does not have to take action like a grantor would- it automatically goes to B.
ex: “to A, but if jazz is played, to B.”
future interest is a shifting executory interest- executory interest that divests a transferee’s freehold estate.
restraints on alienation- types and which are permissible
- absolute restraints are void- ex: to A, as long as she doesn’t try to sell.
- partial restraint- restraint linked to a reasonable, time limited purpose
Promissory restraints (a covenants not to sell) are ok if reasonable and partial
Disabling and forfeiture restraints are prohibited. Disabling voids transfer and forfeiture means the grantee will lose title if they try to sell (as shown above)
life estate- rule and accompanying future interest
estate that is measured by the life or lives of one or more people
“To A for life.”
Future interest: reversion in O, or remainder in 3rd party.
life estate pur autre vie- rule and accompanying future interest
“To A for the life of B”
or if a life tenant conveys his/her interest to another person, the transferee’s estate is measured by the life of the original life tenant
future interest- reversion
life tenants and duty not to commit waste
life tenant cannot do anything to injure the interests of a remainderman or reversioner.
life tenant rights
life tenant is entitled to ordinary uses and profits of the land
affirmative waste- natural resources
life tenant must not consume or exploit (PURGE) natural resources unless:
- PRIOR USE i.e. impliedly able to exploit (for mines- if mining on land prior to life estate, at common law the life tenant could mine open mines but only those open. now trend is to allow mining if it was happening prior to the grant.)
- necessary to REPAIR or maintain the land
- GRANTED the right impliedly or expressly by grantor (implied might be by prior
- land is suitable only for such EXPLOITATION
permissive waste
tenant fails to meet his obligations:
- preserve land and structures
- pay interest on mortgage
- pay ordinary taxes
only obligated up to the income from the land.
duty limited to reasonable rental value if none.
ameloriative waste- common law rule vs modern rule
common law: tenant must not engage in acts to enhance property’s value unless all future interest holders are known and consent
modernly- can destroy or alter buildings if market value of future interests diminished and
- remainderman don’t object, or
- substantial and permanent change in neighborhood conditions deprived property in its current form of reas. productivity or usefulness
reversion
future interest arising in a grantor that conveys less than he/she owns. (but not FSSCS or FSD b/c those have right of entry and poss of reverter)
future interests in people other than grantor
vested remainder
contingent remainder
executory interest
remainder
future interest created in grantee that is capable of becoming possessory upon the expiration of a prior possessory estate expressly created in the same conveyance
remainders only follow life estates
vested remainder subject to open
vested remainder created in a class of persons certain to become possessory but subject to diminution (others born later who also share)
ex: to A for life, then to B’s kids. B has 2 kids- C and D. (have to be identifiable people)
indefeasibly vested remainder
created in an existing and ascertained person
not subject to condition precedent.
Not subject to total divestment by condition subsequent
Not subject to partial divestment by others joining the class
has a right to immediate possession when the prior estate ends.
“to A for life, then to B”
(no strings attached)
In a will “to my children” bc will is effective at death and kids at death are ascertained
vested remainder subject to divestment
vested remainder subject to condition subsequent (i.e. it has a string attached)
“to A for life, remainder to B, provided, however, that if B dies before he reaches 25, to C.”
*look for commas following the remainder
contingent remainder
remainder created in unborn or unascertained persons or subject to condition precedent (condition that has to be satisfied before remainderman has a right)
*look for commas before the remainder to identify condition precedent
ex: to A, then if B goes to law school to B
or to A, then to A’s son (and A doesn’t have kids yet)
rule of destructibility of condition remainders
at common law, a contingent remainder was destroyed if it did not vest before or upon the termination of the preceding estate
“To A for life, then to B if he has reached 21”
if B has not reached 21 when A dies (and the life estate ends), B’s remainder would be destroyed at common law.
now, a springing executory interest is created if the contingent remainder hasn’t vested yet.
“To A for life, then, on A’s death, to A’s heirs” what interest does A have?
common law and now
common law- Rule in Shelley’s case. present and future interests merge to give A a fee simple.
today- A has a life estate, O has a reversion (A could have no heirs) and A’s heirs have a contingent remainder (since they are unascertained)
doctrine of worthier title
If the grantor creates a remainder in his heirs, it is invalid and will become a reversion in the grantor
ex: To A for life, then to my heirs.
(DOWT- it is just “to A for life” with O’s reversion)
DOWT yields in the face of contrary grantor intent (i.e. can still create a contingent remainder in your heirs in the example above if you clearly express you want to do that)