Property Offenses Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Honest Mistake role in Property crimes

A

An honest mistake negates required intent, no matter how unreasonable (though jury is unlikely to believe)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define “Possession” in property law crime.

A

Possession is physical control and the right to exclude others. (General authority over object - more than custody).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define “Custody” in property law crime.

A

Custody is physical entrustment subordinate to the right of others. Limited authority - usually low level employees (less authority than possession).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Larceny: Elements.

A

(1) Trespassory (without consent) (2) taking and (3) carrying away of the (4) personal property (5) of another (6) with the intent to permanently (or for an unreasonable length of time) deprive the owner.

  • # 2 explained: Taking of personal property capable of possession. Realty and fixtures (e.g., crops) cannot be the subject of larceny, unless severed (harvested crops). Gas & electricity considered pers. prop. Slightest movement sufficient.
  • # 3 explained: An innocent agent’s act of carrying away is ascribed to the principal.
  • # s 4 + 5 explained: Larceny is a crime against possession of property (can steal from a thief; can steal property you own if one in possession has higher order than you - bailee)
  • # 6 Intent to permanently deprive required at the time of taking
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is not subject to larceny?

A
  1. Wrongfully obtained services do not give rise to larceny
  2. Co-owned property (partnership) is not subject to larceny or embezzlement by a co-owner
  3. Abandoned property (because no deprivation of owner), EXCEPT…
  • Lost property, if finder intends to permanently deprive its owner and knows, or has reason to believe he can learn, the owner’s identity at moment of possession.
  • Misdelivered property, if recipient realizes mistake and decides to steal at time of delivery.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Defenses to larceny

A

Intent to return: Δ takes property with intent to return unconditionally w/in reasonable time, UNLESS Δ changes his mind and decides not to return it (“continuing trespass”)

Claim of right: Δ takes property as repayment of debt, done openly with explanation

Mistake: If honest mistake. Such mistake may be unreasonable. (belief that it is yours is not larceny).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Embezzlement

A

Intentional fraudulent conversion or misappropriation of another’s personal property by one in lawful possession (e.g., entrusted, having custody)

Δ obtains title by conversion, a serious interference with owner’s rights - no personal gain required. No movement required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Defenses to embezzlement

A

Intent to restore: the exact same property obtained (not an equivalent property, even restoring the same value of money is insufficient since it is different money)

Claim of right: Belief that collecting debt negates intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Larceny by trick

A

Obtaining custody or possession of another’s personal property by a fraudulent representation by Δ with intent to defraud the other (e.g., misrepresentation of fact, false promises, deceit).

Owner is the one to give possession to Δ with consent, rather than Δ physically taking it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

False pretense

A

(i) obtaining title; (ii) to the property of another; (iii) by an intentional (or, in some states, knowing) false statement of past or existing fact; (iv) with intent to defraud the other.

MPC: Any false representation is sufficient, including false promise to perform in future

DEFENSES: intent to restore same property, claim of right (see above).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Compare “larceny by trick” and “false pretenses”

A

Same: Owner GIVES property (cf. larceny and embezzlement where P takes from owner).

Different:
- trick: gets POSSESSION by any trick (asking to borrow).
- pretense: gets TITLE by misrep. of past/present fact (lying about worth).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Receipt of stolen property

A

Δ receives possession of stolen personal property, where Δ knew or believed it was stolen by another, with the intent to deprive the owner of his interest in the property.

  • May infer knowledge or belief from abnormally low price (e.g., 1/4 cheaper)
  • Once police intercepts stolen property, it loses its character as stolen property, but Δ may be guilty of attempted receipt of stolen property if he intended to receive it, believing it was stolen. (must be stolen good at time of receipt).
  • DEFENSES (negate belief of source): mistake of fact, claim of right (see above).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Robbery

A

(larceny+): Taking personal property of another from the person or presence of person (area of control or vicinity) with intent to permanently deprive by force or threat of imminent physical injury or death

Force or threat of force (actual fear) can be made to relatives, companions, or homes. Force may be applied via sedatives

Aggravated robbery: Robbery with a deadly weapon (or creation of such belief, e.g., with empty gun).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Extortion

A

Obtaining property by threat of harm or exposing information (need not be immediate or in V’s presence)

*Different from robbery - threat of FUTURE harm and taking doesn’t have to be in their presence.

Also known as blackmail. Claim of right is NOT a defense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Forgery

A
  1. Making or altering (by drafting, adding, or deleting)
  2. A writing with apparent legal significance (for example, a contract,
    not a painting)
  3. So that it is false; that is, representing that it is something that it
    is not, not merely containing a misrepresentation (for example, a
    fake warehouse receipt, but not an inaccurate real warehouse
    receipt)
  4. With intent to defraud (although no one need actually have been
    defrauded)

Examples: convincing another to sign a document he doesn’t realize he’s signing, altering a document

Not merely containing an inaccuracy or misrepresentation on a document that is itself otherwise genuine

Uttering: (1) offering as genuine; (2) an instrument that may be the subject of forgery and is false; (3) with intent to defraud. If successful, Δ may liable for false pretenses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Burglary

A
  1. A breaking (creating or enlarging an opening by at least minimal
    force, fraud or mispresentation, or intimidation; if consent, then no burglary; if window is wide open, then no, but if open interior door to another room or closet door then yes. Breaking out NO).
  2. And entry (placing any portion of the body or any instrument used
    to commit the crime into the structure)
  3. Of a dwelling (a structure used with regularity for sleeping purposes,
    even if used for other purposes such as conducting a
    business; not a barn or commercial structure)
  4. Of another (ownership is irrelevant; occupancy by someone other
    than the D is all that is required)
  5. At nighttime
  6. With the intent (at time of breacking and entering) to commit a felony in the structure (felony need
    not be carried out to constitute burglary)

Modernly, expanded to include all kinds of structures (including cars) at any time (including daytime).

17
Q

Arson:

A

Malicious burning of the dwelling house (modernly, any structure) possessed by another.

Malice = intent to burn the structure or reckless disregard of a high risk that the structure will burn (not specific intent crime)

“Charring” is required; “blackening” or “scorching” is insufficient.

18
Q

What is continuing trespass for larceny?

A

If the defendant wrongfully takes property without the intent to
permanently deprive (for example, without permission borrows an
umbrella), and later decides to keep the property, the defendant is
guilty of larceny when they decide to keep it. However, if the original
taking was not wrongful (for example, the defendant took the
umbrella thinking it was theirs) and later decides to keep it, it is not
larceny.