Property Offences; Theft and Fraud Flashcards
S. 1 Theft Act 1968
A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it.
S. 4 Theft Act 1968; Property definition
Property definition is money and real or personal property
Land cannot be stolen (but some things on land can be stolen)
-Intangible property cannot be stolen (oxford v Moss)
Borrowing
Borrowing becomes appropriation when the individual decides to permanently keep the item
Appropriate
-Don’t need to take property to assume rights
Pitham & Hehl
Rights of owner include possess, sell, use, destroy, damage
R v Morris
Appropriation can occur even with consent
The owner can consent but appropriation can still occur
Lawrence v MPC
R v Gomez
Appropriation and Gifts
A gift can be appropriation of property if it is obtained Dishonestly
R v Hinks
Theft: Intentionally abandoned items
Property belongs to another when they have possession and control over it or a property right/interest
If no one has this and the item has been intentionally abandoned then it can’t be stolen
Parker v British Airways
Exception
If the item is on property where they can exclude the D then it is appropriation
Hibbert v Mckiernan (golf course/balls)
Appropriation; Bailey and property
If your property is given to a Bailiff then you can steal your own property back
R v Turner
Appropriation; given property for a specific use
If you are given property for a specific use then you are obliged to use it in that way
Davidge v Burnett
Except (if you normally just receive the funds and are allowed to place them in a general account)
Huskission
Theft; Mens Rea
Intention to Permanently deprive ( you don’t actually have to deprive them of it)
If you borrow and return qualitatively the same thing its still theft
Velumyl
Theft; Section 6, Borrowing and exhausting value
Borrowing property and treating it as your own and make it to an outright taking by giving it back to the owner once you have exhausted its value, is theft.
Theft; Mens Rea; Dishonesty
Dishonesty not defined in the Act, but gives some states of mind that are inconsistent with dishonesty:
A) Belief that D has in law a right to deprive property
B) Belief that D would have the owners consent if the owner knew
C) appropriates property in belief that D cannot find the rightful owner by taking reasonable steps (finders keepers)
Theft; Dishonesty; Gosh Test
Test for dishonesty is an Objective Test
1) Jury must consider if the conduct of D was dishonest according to the standards of “ordinary reasonable and honest people”
If he is dishonest by this standard
2) the Jury must consider if D realized that
Fraud Act 2006
D makes a false representation as to Fact or law, including the state of mind
Fraud; Actus Reus
Express representation of Fact:
nothing wrong with car
Implied representation by the buyer
-A cheque says you have banks authority
Implied representation by the seller
-sell a car in front of house;implies it is your house
Implied by conduct
- paint over rust on a car
- staying silent when you have a duty to disclose