Property Offences Flashcards
Elements of the offence under S.1(1) of the CDA (2 MR, 4 AR)?
Criminal Damage
MR:
- Intention or Recklessness as to the damage or destruction
- Knowing or realising that it might belong to another
AR:
- Destroy or damage
- Property - excludes intangible property
- Belonging to another
- Without lawful excuse
Define “destroy or damage” (3 points)
Ordinary English words, but
- Ultimately a question of FACT OR DEGREE
- Evidence of EXPENSE OR EFFORT to remedy the consequences of D’s acts may be indicative of damage
- Damage includes IMPAIRMENT of value and usefulness in addition to physical harm
Elements of the offence under S.1(2) of the CDA (2 MR, 4 AR)?
Aggravated Criminal Damage
MR:
- Intention or recklessness as to destruction or damage of property; and
- Intention or recklessness as to whether the life of another might thereby be endangered
AR:
- Destroying or damaging
- Property
- Belonging to D or another
- Where the danger must arise from the DAMAGE caused, rather than the damage’s CAUSE (cf Steer - Bullets, with Dudley - Fire from firebombs)
Elements of arson (2 MR, 5 AR?)
Same as Criminal Damage, one extra AR
MR:
- Intention or Recklessness as to the damage or destruction of the property by fire
- Knowing or realising that it might belong to another
AR:
- Destroy or damage
- Property - excludes intangible property
- Belonging to another
- Without lawful excuse
- BY FIRE
Elements of aggravated arson (2 MR, 5 AR)?
Same as Aggravated Criminal Damage, one extra AR
MR:
- Intention or recklessness as to destruction or damage of property by fire; and
- Intention or recklessness as to whether the life of another might thereby be endangered by fire
AR:
- Destroying or damaging
- Property
- Belonging to D or another
- Where the danger must arise from the DAMAGE caused, rather than the damage’s CAUSE (cf Steer - Bullets, with Dudley - Fire from firebombs)
- and the damage is caused by fire
Elements of offence under S.2 of the CDA (2MR; 2 AR)
Making Threats to Destroy or Damage Property.
MR:
- Intention that the person to whom the threat is made would fear that it will be carried out.
- If threat is to destroy or damage his own property, he must know that this is likely to endanger the life of that other or a third person
AR:
- Makes a threat to another to (i) destroy or damage property belonging to that other or a third person; or (ii) destroy or damage his own property in a way that he knows is likely to endanger the life of that other or a third person
- Without lawful excuse
Elements of offence under S.3 of the CDA (2 MR; 1 AR)
Possession with Intent to Destroy or Damage Property
MR:
1. Intention to use the item, or permit another to use it to (i) destroy or damage property belonging to another; or (ii) destroy or damage his or the user’s own property in a way that he knows is likely to endanger the life of that other or a third person
AR:
2. D has something in his custody or under his control
For which CDA offences is the defence of lawful excuse NOT available?
Not available for (i) aggravated offences; or (ii) any CDA offence if D additionally knows he is likely to endanger life
What is the lawful excuse under S.5(2)(a) of the CDA? Objective or subjective?
Belief that the owner consented or would have consented had he known. Test is ENTIRELY subjective and requires only an honest, genuine belief - intoxication, immorality or illegality is irrelevant.
What is the lawful excuse under S.5(2)(b) of the CDA? Objective or subjective? 5 elements.
Belief that the damage was necessary to protect other property belonging to D or another.
Mens rea is purely subjective - requires only an honest belief. But there are two objective elements, see below.
5 elements:
- Acted to PROTECT property belonging to himself or another
- Believing the property is in IMMEDIATE need of protection
- Believing that the means of protection adopted are REASONABLE
- Those means are OBJECTIVELY REASONABLE in the circumstances
- Those means must be objectively CAPABLE of protecting the property from further damage
What other defences can D have besides lawful excuse to a charge under CDA?
Any normal defence - self-defence, duress, etc, which can apply to all defences, including aggravated ones.
Define appropriation. When must appropriation take place?
Pursuant to S.3(1) of the Theft Act, appropriation = any assumption by a person of the rights of an owner. Appropriation can take place AFTER the item is found, so long as it coincides at some point with the MR.
When is D never liable for theft?
Where he is an innocent purchaser, i.e., did not know he was buying stolen property (S.3(2)).
Five types of property that cannot be stolen (with appropriate exceptions)?
S.4(1)-S.4(4) -
- Confidential information
- Electricity
- Land, unless the property allegedly stolen is severed from the land
- Wild flowers or fruit unless picked for reward or sale
- Wild animals unless reduced or being reduced into possession by another at the time D appropriates them
What types of property are included in S.4(1) of the Theft Act?
Money, personalty, realty, things in action and intangibles (e.g. patent, but NOT confidential information)