Property Offences Flashcards
What case did the case R v Vinall set out?
Legal principle: the defendant must ‘assume’ at least one right of ownership.
What legal principle did the case R v Pitham & Hehl set out?
Legal principle: appropriation can be assuming the right to sell the property, even if it it’s never removed.
What legal principle did the case R v Morris set out?
Legal principle: it does not have to be ALL rights of ownership that are assumed.
What legal principle did the case Lawrence v Commissioner for Metropolitan Police set out?
Legal principle: Appropriation can happen, even with the owners consent.
What legal principle did the case R v Gomez set out?
legal principle: Gomez suggest that the appropriation must take place at a specific time.
What legal principle did the case R v Hinks set out?
Legal principle: appropriation can still happen if it’s a valid gift.
What legal principle did the case R v Atakpu and Abrahams set out?
Legal principle: the appropriation happens the first time a right of ownership is assumed.
