Property Offences Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Definition of Theft

Theft

A

‘A person is guilty of theft is he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it; and ‘‘theif’’ and ‘‘steal’’ shall be constructed accordingly’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Elements of the Theft Act s1 1968

A

s2 – Dishonestly – mens rea
s3 – Appropriates – actus reus
s4 – Property – actus reus
s5 – Belonging to Another – actus reus
s6 – With the intention of permanently depriving the other of it – mens rea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

s3 Appropriation

Theft

A
  • Any assumption by a person of the rights of an owner amounts to appropriation
  • E.g. D hires DVD but later doesn’t reutrn
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

s4 Property

Theft

A
  • Includes:
    1) Money
    2) Real property, e.g. land, building etc
    3) Personal property, e.g. books, aeroplanes etc
    4) Things in action, e.g. bank account, trade marks etc
    5) Other intangible property, e.g. a patent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

s4 Property - Things Which Cannot be Stolen

Theft

A
  • s4(3) Mushrooms, fruit and plants growing in the wild, unless its for profit
  • s4(4) Wild creatures
  • Electricity (is a seperate offence)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

s5 Belonging to Another

Theft

A
  • Property is regarded as belonging to any person having possesion or control of it, or having any proprietary interest in it
  • E.g. Someone who hires a car has control and posession of it but does not own it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

s2 Dishonesty

Theft

A
  • Offence has to be done dishonestly
  • D doesn’t have to have gained anything to be liable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

3 Exceptions where Theft isn’t dishonest

Theft

A

1) Has, in law, the right to deprive the other of it
2) He would have the others consesnt if the other knew
3) The person who the proeprty belogs to cant be seen taking reasonable steps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the Ghosh test for Dishonesty

Theft

A

1) Was what D did dishonest according to to the ordinary standards of reaosnable and honest people?
2) Did the D realise that what they did was dishonest by those standards?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

s6 Intention to Permenantley Deprive

Theft

A
  • Intention is found if the person treats the thing as their own to dispose of regardless of the other’s rights
  • A borrowing or lending may amount to an intention to permanently deprive if it for a period of time and in the circumstances equivelant to an outright taking or disposal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Lavender v DPP (1994)

Theft

A

D removed doors of coucil flat to put in gf’s house

D intened to treat doors as his own regardless of council’s rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Lawrence (1972)

Theft

A

D took £7 instead of £1 taxi fee from Italian Tourist.

Absence of belief that owner consented to the appropriation so dishonest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v Morris (1983)

Theft

A

D swapped price labels in shop.

Trying to pay lower price = appropriation, interefere with owners rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Turner (1971)

Theft

A

D’s car in garage. Agreed to pay when he collected car. D took spare key and took car without payment

Convicted of stealing own car as garage had possession and control at time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define Robbery

Robbery

A

‘A person is guilty of robbery if he steals, and immediatley before or at the time of doing so, and in order to do so, he uses force on any person or puts or seeks to put any person in fear of being then and there subjected to force’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What part of the Theft Act is Robbery?

Robbery

A

s8 Theft Act 1968

17
Q

Actus Reus of Robbery

Robbery

A
  • Theft = there must be completed theft. No theft means no robbery
  • Force = D must apply or threaten to apply force to V
  • In order to do so = Use or threat of force must be in order to steal
  • Immediatley before or at the time of doing so = force or threat must be before or at time of theft for it to be a robbery
18
Q

Mens Rea for Robbery

Robbery

A
  • Must prove mens rea for theft
  • Must prove there was intended use of force to steal
19
Q

R v Dawson and James (1976)

Robbery

A

D pushed V so V lost balance. D2 then stole V’s wallet

D’s guilty as force applied

20
Q

R v Lockely (1995)

Robbery

A

D was challenged leaving a shop after he took cans of beer. D pushed shopkeeper and ran off

Theft seen as continuing act even though force was seperate to stealing

21
Q

Define Attempted Crime

Attempts

A

‘If, with intent to commit an offence to which this section applies, a person does an act which is more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence, he is guilty of attempting to commit the offence’

22
Q

Actus Reus of Attempt

Attempts

A
  • A positive act, not an omission
  • An act that is ‘more than merely preparatory’ is not an attempt, but could be another offence such as conspiracy, going equipped etc
23
Q

R v Jones (1990)

Attempts

A

D got into V’s car and pointed a shotgun at him

MTMP - All he had to do was pull trigger to commit full crime

23
Q

R v Jones (1990)

Attempts

A

D got into V’s car and pointed a shotgun at him

MTMP - All he had to do was pull trigger to commit full crime (murder)

24
Q

R v Boyle and Boyle (1987)

Attempts

A
  • D1 and D2 found standing next to door with broken lock and hinge

MTMP - Only had to go into house to commit full crime (burglary)

25
Q

Mens Rea of Attempts

Attempts

A
  • Intent to commit a full crime
  • Recklessness does not suffice
26
Q

What is Factual Liability in ‘Impossible Crimes’

Attempts

A

s1(2) - ‘A person may be guilty of attmepting to commit an offence to which this section applies even though the facts are such that the commission of the offence is impossible’

27
Q

What are the 2 factors in Attempting an Impossible Crime

Attempts

A
  • Legal Impossibility
  • Factual Impossibility
28
Q

What is Legal Impossibility in ‘Impossible Crimes’

Attempts

A

s1(3) - ‘In any case where…’
a) apart from the subsection a person’s intention would not be regarded as having amounted to an intent to commit an offence; but
b) if the facts of the case had been as he believed them to be, his intention would be so regarded, then, for the purpose of subsection (1) above, he shall be regarded as having an intent to commit that offence

29
Q

R v Jones (2007)

Impossible Crimes

Attempts

A

D tried to solicit young girls for sex. One was an undercover police officer

Wasn’t actually 12-year-old, D still convicted for attmepting impossible

30
Q

R v Jones (2007)

Impossible Crimes

Attempts

A

D tried to solicit young girls for sex. One was an undercover police officer

Wasn’t actually 12-year-old, D still convicted for attmepting impossible

31
Q

R v Whybrow (1951)

Attempts

A

D wired a soap dish next to bath to electrocute V

Clear intent to kill, was attempted murder

32
Q

R v Millard (1987)

Attempts

A

D arrested for pushing V against a wooden fence at a football match

No attempt, no intent and recklessness does not suffice