Property Law Flashcards

1
Q

National Provincial Bank v Ainsworth [1965]

A

Not good law but Lord Wilberforce set out a ‘classic statement’ of distinction in which property must be…
1. definable
2. identifiable by third parties
3. capable of assumption by third parties
4. have some degree of permanence or stability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Pierson v Post 3 Cai (1805)

A

US Case
Possession of a fox - the animal must be captured or killed to constitute possession - finding and chasing a wild animal does not give a personal possession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Seymane’s case 1604

A

Views of property (Blakckstonian view)
‘the house of everyone is to him as his castle and fortress’ - property = liberty and security

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Mew v Tristmere Ltd [2011]

A

Distinguishing between land and chattels - houseboats were considered to be chattels because they were originally capable of floating and not intended to be permanent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Elitestone v Morris [1997]

A

Distinguishing between land and chattels - bungalow held to be real property as it could not be moved without completely dismantling it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Chelsea Yacht and Boat Co v Pope [2000]

A

Distinguishing between land and chattels - houseboat held to be a chattel as it could be detached from bank and moved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Hill v Tupper (1863)

A

Easement - the benefit of an easement must be for the land, it cannot benefit something else ,like a business if it does not benefit the land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Armory v Delamirie (1722)

A

True ownership v possessory title
The ‘first in time’ possessor has a better title than anyone else except the true owner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v Graham [2002]

A

Limitations on ownership - a trespasser who occupies land over time, excluding the true owner, can gain title to the land over time if they can demonstrate
- factual possession (physical custody and control)
- intention to possess (intention to exercise custody and control)
As per Lord Browne - Wilkinson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Colonial Bank v Whinney [1885]

A

“All personal things are either in possession or in action. The law knows no tertium quid between the two” - as per Fry LJ
Personal Property: Tangible (choses in possession)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Torkington v Magee [1902]

A

Personal Property: Intangible
Chose in action is defined as ‘personal rights of property which can only be claimed or enforced by action, and not taking physical possession”
Claimed through legal or equitable action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

AA v Persons Unknown and Bitfinex [2019]

A

“I consider that crypto assets such as Bitcoin are property” - Bryan J’s judgment granted that digital assets have proprietary injunctions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

LPA 1925 s. 205 (1) (ix) definition of ‘land’:

A

‘land’ includes the land of any tenure, and mines and minerals, whether held apart from the surface, buildings or parts of buildings … an easement, right, privilege or benefit in, over, or derived from land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Law of Property Act (LPA) 1925 s1 (1): legal estates in land

A

the only estates in land which are capable of subsisting or of being conveyed or created at law are -
a. an estate in fee simple absolute in possession (freehold)
b. a term of years absolute (leasehold)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Law of Property Act (LPA) 1925, s1 (2): legal interests in land

A

The only interests or charges in or over land which are capable of subsisting or of being or created at law are -
a. an easement
b. a charge by way of legal mortgage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Law of Property Act (LPA) 1925 s1 (3): equitable interests in land

A

All other estates, interests and charges in or over land take effect as equitable interests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Land Registration Act (LRA) 2002, s2: registration provisions

A

The Act makes provision about the registration of title to-
a. unregistered legal estates which are interests of any of the following kind
- leaseholds
-freeholds
- profits, rent charges and franchises (not on module

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

LRA 2002 s.4: first registration of title

A

s4 (1) - the requirement of registration applies on the occurrence of the set items
s4 (2) - qualifying legal estates include:
- a freehold estate in land
- a leasehold estate in land for a term for which, at the time of transfer, grant or creation, has more than seven years to run

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

LRA 2002 s3: voluntary first registration

A

A person may apply to the registrar to be registered as the proprietor of an unregistered legal estate to which this section applies if—
a. the estate is vested in him, or
b. he is entitled to require the estate to be vested in him.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

LRA 2002, ss 23 - 24: owner’s powers

A

Owner’s powers consist of
a. power to make a disposition of any kind permitted by the general law
b. power to charge the estate at law with the payment of money
A person is entitled to exercise the owner’s powers if he is the registered proprietor or entitled to be registered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

LRA 2002, s27 (1): effect of failure to register

A

It does not operate at law until the relevant registration requirements are met

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

LRA 2002, s27 (2): dispositions of already registered land

A

The following are dispositions which are required to be completed by registration
a. a transfer
b. where the registered estate is an estate in land, the grant of term of years is absolute
c. where the registered estate is a franchise or manor… (not on module)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

LRA 2002, ss 28- 30: priorities in registered land

A

s28 = the Basic Rule - an earlier interest takes priority
s29 = the Special Rule - special protection for a purchaser
s30 = charges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

LRA 2002 , ss 32- 33: notices

A

A notice protects the priority of a third-party interest in registered land against a ‘disposition for value.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
LRA 2002, ss 40: restrictions on dealings
Register entry regulating how changes can be made to the register
26
LRA 2002, s 58: conclusiveness of the Land Register
If on entry of a person in the register as the proprietor of a legal estate, the legal estate would not be otherwise vested in him, it shall be deemed to be vested in him as a result of the registration
27
LRA 2002, Schedule 4: alteration of the register
Alteration and rectification of the Land Register References to rectification, about alteration of the register, are to alteration which— a. involves the correction of a mistake and b. prejudicially affects the title of a registered proprietor.
28
LRA 2002, Schedule 4, para 1
Rectification of the Register It only applies to rather narrow circumstances: - the correction of a mistake - this prejudicially affects the title of a registered proprietor
29
LRA 2002, Schedule 4, para 3(2)
Protection of Proprietor in Possession No order may be made without the proprietor's consent in relation to land in his possession unless: - the proprietor has by fraud or lack of proper care caused or contributed to the mistake - it would be unjust for any other reason for the alteration not to be made
30
LRA 2002, Schedule 4, para 8
Effect on priorities in alteration and rectification: allows the court and Land Registrar, to 'change for the future the priority of any interest affecting the registered estate or charge concerned'
31
Swift 1st Ltd v Chief Land Registrar [2015]
How is fraud dealt with in registered land? The registration as a proprietor gives the buyer a legal and equitable title The defrauded 'true owner' no longer has a proprietary right in the property - this protects dynamic security True owner can apply to rectify title: losing party (true owner) can apply to Land Registry for indemnity
32
LRA 2002, Schedule 8 - indemnities
The reasons why a person is entitled to be indemnified by the register if he/ she suffers loss for any reason such as mistakes, failure by the registrar or rectification of the register Only available for rectification, not alterations
33
LRA 2002, Schedule 8 para 1(1)(a)
Indemnity can be paid for: - decision to rectify - loss as a result of rectification
34
LRA 2002, Schedule 8 para 1(1)(b)
Indemnity can be paid for: - decision not to rectify - loss suffered when a mistake has occurred but decision not to rectify the register
35
LRA 2002, Schedule 8, para 5
There is no indemnity due to loss as a result of a person's own fraud or lack of proper care
36
LRA 2002, Schedule 8 para 6
Amounts of indemnity to be paid para 6(a) - the decision to rectify - a value of the estate, interest or charge that is lost immediately before rectification para 6(b) - decision not to rectify - value of the estate, interest or charge at the date the mistake that caused the loss was made
37
Re Chowood's Registered Land [1933]
Indemnity and overriding interests No indemnity is payable if the registered is altered to show an overriding interest The proprietor was always bound by the overriding interest even though not on the register
38
Knights Construction v Roberto Mac [2011]
Mistaken registration of freehold interest: The SA mistakenly applied for first registration of a freehold interest in land that belonged to KC, and the SA later sold the land to RM No fraud and RM purchased land in good faith and for valuable consideration – KC applied for rectification Held: KC was entitled to rectification of RM’s registered title to exclude the disputed land. RM entitled to compensation from the Land Registry
39
Gold Harp Properties Ltd v MacLeod [2014]
Effect on priorities on rectification Underhill LJ held that the priority of an original leasehold interest that has been mistakenly deleted from the register should be restored – even though this renewed leasehold interest was registered after Gold Harp’s leasehold interest, so should not have had priority
40
LRA 2002, Schedule 3: overriding interests
Module focuses on paragraph 1 and 2 Paragraph 1 - a leasehold estate 'granted for a term not exceeding seven years' Paragraph 2 - an interest belonging to a person in actual occupation of the land
41
What is an 'overriding interest?'
'overriding' means that the interest is enforceable, and therefore binding on a new purchaser of the land, despite not appearing on the Register
42
LRA 2002, Schedule 3, paragraph 1: leasehold estates in land
Short leases as overriding interests - 'not exceeding seven years' - must be created by deed for a term of 3 years or less giving immediate possession at market rent (legal lease) - automatically overriding
43
LRA 2002, Schedule 3, paragraph 2: an interest belonging to someone in actual occupation of the land
- interest must be proprietary (and not personal) - the interest must belong at the time of disposition to a person in actual occupation of the land
44
Chokar v Chokar [1984]
Nature and state of property affects whether there is actual occupation House - there must be some degree of permanence and continuity, and if the person is absent, an intention to return
45
Malory Enterprises Ltd v Cheshire Homes [2002]
Nature and state of property affects whether there is actual occupation Derelict land - signs, bordered windows, fence, padlocked gate etc all held as actual occupation
46
Chaudhary v Yavus [2011]
Nature and state of property affects whether there is actual occupation Metal staircase in easement - not actual occupation
47
Link Lending v Bustard [2010]
There are many factors in assessing actual occupation Mummery LJ - can include nature of the property, circumstances of the person, degree of permanence and continuity, intentions etc
48
Thomas v Clydesdale Bank Plc [2010]
How safeguards work in practice Mr Justice Ramsey - "It is the visible signs of occupation which have to be obvious on inspection"
49
Street v Mountford [1985]
Essentials of a lease - the tenant has exclusive possession and the right to occupy the premise and exclude all other including the landlord
50
Lace v Chantler [1944]
Essentials of a lease - a lease is granted for a fixed term and not for an uncertain period (eg someone's lfie)
51
ss. 52 (1) and 54 (2) Law of Property Act 1925
Essentials of a lease - a lease is granted with proper formalities - by deed unless fits the short lease exemption for leases of 3 years or less
52
Re Ellenborough Park [1956]
The criteria for an easement 1. there must be a dominant tenement, which has the benefit of the easement, and a servient tenement, which has the burden of the easement 2. an easement must accommodate the dominant tenement 3. the dominant and servient owners must be different people 4. the right must be 'capable of forming the subject matter of a grant' - i.e. not something vague
53
Rhone v Stephens [1994]
The doctrine of restrictive covenants in Tulk v Moxhay (1848) cannot apply to positive covenants too. A positive covenant is a contract Entrenches distinction between positive and negative covenants Burden of positive covenants cannot run with the land
54
Tulk v Moxhay (1848)
Restrictive covenants - Lord Cottenham Restrictive covenants can 'run with the land in equity' Notice of covenants are required
55
What is a covenant?
A promise made in a written deed
56
What is a restrictive covenant?
A promise not to do something Capable of being a proprietary right that runs with the land Needs notice
57
What is a positive covenant?
A promise to do something A personal right and only enforceable between parties to the deed - cannot run with the land
58
What is tenure?
The notion of one person holding rights in land It is how a piece of land is held by the owner Eg. I own a house can be 'I have tenure'
59
What is an easement?
A legal right of way A right over one piece of land for the benefit of another piece of land - closely associated with enjoyment of property
60
What is a freehold estate?
Lasts indefinitely - closest thing to absolute ownership
61
What is a leasehold estate?
Created by the freeholder of the land A 'lesser right' in the freeholder's land Own property for a set time
62
LPA 1925, s52: creation by a deed
52 (1) obligation to use a deed: 1. All conveyances of land or of any interest therein are void to convey or create a legal estate unless made by a deed 2. This section does not apply to leases and tenancies
63
LPA 1925: s, 87: effect of mortgage
'The mortgage shall have the same protection, powers and remedies' as if the mortgage had been created as a 3000-year lease, in other words, the same protections as if it were an estate in land
64
LRA 2002, s23: owner's powers to create a legal mortgage
They have the power to make a disposition of any kind permitted by the general law in relation to an interest of the description, other than a mortgage by demise or sub-demise
65
LRA 2002, s27 (3): registration of mortgages
In the case of a registered charge, the following are dispositions which are required to be completed by registration a. a transfer b. the grant of a sub- charge
66
Milroy v Lord (1862)
Legal formalities for the creation and transfer of property rights A lifetime gift of a freehold interest in land - the donor retains no rights to the property and retains no obligations to the donee once the transfer of the property to B has been effected
67
Wills Act 1837, as amended
Legal formalities for the creation and transfer of property rights Section 9 - 1. No will shall be valid unless a. It is in writing and signed by the testator, or by some other person in his presence and by his direction; and b. It appears that the testator intended by his signature to give effect to the will; and c. The signature is made or acknowledged by the testator in the presence of two or more witnesses present at the same time; and d. Each witness either - i. Attests and signs the will; or ii. Acknowledge his signature In the presence of a testator (but not necessarily in the presence of any other witness) But no form of attestation shall be necessary 'presence' includes presence by means of videoconference or other visual transmission
68
Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, s1: deed
Legal formalities for the creation and transfer of property rights A document must be applied by - making it clear on its face it's intended to be a deed - valid execution as a deed (signed/ attestation) - delivery as a deed
69
Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, s2 : Contracts for sale etc, of land to be made by signed writing
Land
70
LPA 1925, s54 (1): Creation of interests in land by parol
Land
71
LPA 1925, s52: Conveyances to be by deed
Land
72
LPA 1925, s53: creation and transfer of equitable interests in land
73
Bills of Exchange Act 1882: cheques
Intangible personal property Cheques must be endorsed
74
LPA 1925, s136: debts
Intangible personal property Debts must be assigned in writing, and express notice in writing must also be given to the debtor
75
Section 1 and Schedule 1 Stock Transfer Act 1963
Shares in private companies
76
s113, s128A and ss770-773 Companies Act 2006 and Art 26 Model Articles
Shares in private companies: ‘The directors may refuse to register the transfer of a share, and if they do so, the instrument of transfer must be returned to the transferee with notice of refusal unless they suspect that the proposed transfer may be fraudulent'
77
Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, s1 deed
Tangible personal property A document must be applied by - Making it clear on its face its intended to be a deed eg, ‘Deed of Transfer’ - Valid execution as a deed (for individuals this means signed in the presence of a witness who attests the signature) - Delivery as a deed
78
Glaister - Carlisle v Glaister- Carlisle, The Times, 22 February 1968
Intention to give in an informal transfer of title to tangible personal property A heated argument and one of couple handed over dog – there was not a settled intention to give It was a rash act, an intention to give cannot be ‘heat of the moment’
79
Dewar v Dewar [1975]
Intention to give in an informal transfer of title to tangible personal property The mother intended to give her son a sum of money to buy a house. The son intended to treat the sum of money as a loan – the transaction was a gift because the son could not force his mother to take the money back
80
Re Cole [1964]
Actual delivery in informal transfer of title to tangible personal property - Words of gift are insufficient to transfer property
81
Lock v Heath (1892)
Symbolic delivery – effective symbolic delivery because the inventory and the singular chair were symbolic of everything she was entitled to on the list
82
Thomas v Times Book Co Ltd [1966]
Constructive delivery – effective constructive delivery because Thomas had uttered ‘words of gift’ and had put the producer in a position to take delivery of the object of the gift
83
Rawlinson v Mort (1905)
Actual delivery – words of gift were made, and hands were placed on the musical instrument and this was sufficient to be delivery – words alone were not enough – a complication