Property Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Property

A

Anything (physical or intangible) that can be owned by a person or entity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Adverse possession

A

A doctrine under which a person in possession of land owned by someone else may acquire valid title to it, so long as certain common law requirements are met, and the person is in possession for a sufficient period of time.

The possession has to be hostile or adverse to the owner’s wishes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Personal property/Chattel

A

movable tangible property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Intangible property

A

Property that is untouchable like goodwills and IP rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Landlord-tenant law

A

Governs the rental of commercial and residential property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Real property

A

Refers to land and anything that land contains be it minerals underground or crops.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Title

A

Demonstrates ownership of property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does property law pertain to?

A
  1. About human interactions
  2. The human interaction must relate to something (like an object etc.)
  3. The thing in question can be of various kinds (immovable, movable, intangible, notional)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Notional property

A

Legal rules create fictional assets in particular contexts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Trespass (Civil Action)

A

Civil action owner of immovable property can take legal action if person enters property without prior authorization.

If trespasser acted willingly or decidedly (meaning he or she had control of his or her actions), state of mind (whether they unintentionally crossed land or not, or whether they was malicious intent) or whether harm was caused does not matter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why does the Law of Trespass not care about whether harm was done or the intent of the trespass?

A

It emerged historically as the principle by which owners could have the boundaries of their land delineated.

The dispute is the basis for delineating land boundaries. So, these two things have to be taken out of consideration in the dispute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Features of American Property Law

A
  1. State court rulings, for the most part, form the basis of American property law.
  2. Has a dose of legal realism.
  3. It is adaptable depending on the situation. It adopts various different values and objectives to adapt to various situations.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are different state approaches to satisfy the hostile/adverse requirement under the Law of Adverse Possession?

A

Maine Rule: Possessor needs to show intent to possess land of another person.

Connecticut Rule: Permission was not sought to possess the land by the adverse possessor from the owner.

Other Approaches: Intentional trespasses are problematic and will not allow for adverse possession in some jurisdictions. Mistakes can satisfy the adverse/hostile element however.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Legal realism

A

Movement that took place in first half of 20th century

According to this theory, judges consider not only abstract rules, but also social interests and public policy when deciding a case.

Ex: A judge making a decision based on how it would impact the public’s welfare.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Legal formalism

A

According to this theory, once lawmakers produce rules, judges apply them to the facts of a case without regard to social interests and public policy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Revolution in Landlord-Tenant law of 50s and 60s.

A

Landlords had so much power with housing shortages. Tenants were forced to pay exorbitant rents and deal with unlivable housing conditions, per their leases.

Courts recognized the housing crisis and created protections for tenants.

17
Q

Javins v. National Bank

A

Tenant refused to pay rent because of lack of repairs from landlord, despite a contract stating tenant must pay rent.

Judge Skelly Wright created doctrine of implied warranty of habitability.

Judge recognized traditional contract law does not apply here due to unequal bargaining power between parties.

Consumer protection law should apply to protect tenants.

18
Q

Doctrine of implied warranty of habitability

A

This warranty requires landlords to keep their property “habitable,” even if the lease does not specifically require them to make repairs.

19
Q

Shack vs State

A

Defendants entered upon private property in order to aid migrant workers housed thereupon, and, after being ordered to leave by the owner, refused and were convicted of trespassing.

Under New Jersey state property law there is no right to bar access to government services available to migrant workers; therefore, no trespass occurred.

20
Q

Trespass on chattels

A

Owner of chattel may bring action against defendant if defendant interfered with owner’s ability to use chattel or caused damage to chattel while using it.

Ex: Taking my phone away while I am using it. Breaking my phone.

Cannot sue if phone is used when I am not using unless damage is caused.

21
Q

Johnson v. Weedman

A

Man sues another man for using horse for 15 hours without former’s permission.

No harm was sustained to horse. Owner was not using horse at the time. So, Supreme Court of Illinois ruled for defendant.

Fun fact: Lawyer for defendant was Abraham Lincoln.

Gave rise to trespass upon chattels doctrine.

22
Q

License

A

Permission granted by owner of property to someone to do something with property without being sued.

Ex: Giving permission to do contract work in house without being sued.

23
Q

English common law types of licenses

A

Mere license (A general promise not to sue) (Can be revoked any time)

License coupled with a grant (If affirmative permission is granted to do something, operates as grant of interest in property and cannot be revoked until it has ended) (Ex: Some English courts used to say if you have a movie ticket, you have a grant of interest in the movie theater until movie ends and that cannot be revoked until the movie ends)

24
Q

Marrone vs Washington Jockey Club

A

Ruled for Washington Jockey Club. Tickets for horse races or anything for that matter are mere licenses, not licenses with grants.