Property II Flashcards
Fair Housing Act
a. Prohibitions
i. Prohibits discrimination based on the following classifications in the sale or rental of a dwelling:
1. Race
2. Ethnicity
3. Religion
4. National origin
5. Sex
6. Familial status
a. Families with minor children
b. Pregnant people
7. National origin
8. Disability
ii. Prohibited conduct includes refusing to:
1. Rent, sell, or negotiate, or
2. Providing different terms, conditions, or privileges based on a protected status
iii. Act also prohibits publishing any advertisement that indicates a preference on prospective tenants or buyers
Exceptions to FHA
ii. FHA applies to most dwellings except:
1. Exemption
a. Owner-occupied apartment with up to four units
b. Single-family residences rented or sold without a real estate broker or salesperson
i. Applies only to general provision
2. Exception
a. Shared living units (i.e., roommates)
i. Applies to both general provision and advertisements
Dwelling (FHA)
Any building, structure, or portion thereof which is occupied as, or designed or intended for occupancy as, a residence by one or more families
Civil Rights Act
a. Generally
i. Prohibits discrimination based on race in the leasing or sale or any type of property; however, it does not cover advertising
ii. Only applies to intentional discrimination
Servitude
a. Servitude
i. Non-possessory interest in land
ii. Enable private agreements among owners that regulate either the way property is used by an owner or access to another owner’s property for a specific purpose
Types of servitudes
i. Easements
1. Express
2. Implied
ii. Covenants
1. Real covenant
2. Equitable servitude
Easements
i. Non-possessory right to use the land of another person
ii. Easement grants less than full possession of the land, instead granting only the right to perform specific acts
iii. Easement may be intended to be permanent or irrevocable for a specified period of time
Express easements
i. Creation
1. Voluntarily created in deed, will, or other written instrument
ii. Types of creation
1. Grant
a. Conveys easement to another person
2. Reservation
a. Reserves easement in land when transferring land to another person
iii. Statute of Frauds
1. In writing
2. Signed
Implied easements
- Without agreement
a. Easement implied by prior existing use
b. Easement by necessity
c. Prescriptive easement
d. Easement by estoppel (or irrevocable license)
Affirmative easements
Allows holder of easement to perform act on land
Negative easements
Express easement that entitles the dominant owner to prevent the servient owner from performing an act on servient land
Conservation easements
- Most common negative easements
- Express easement that restricts the development and use of the servient land in order to preserve open space, farmland, historical sites, or wild and undeveloped land
Easement appurtenant
- Benefits the dominant land
- Attached to the land, not the person
Easement in gross
- Not attached to the land
- Benefits the easement holder in personal capacity
- Includes commercial uses
Easement implied by prior existing use
- Claimants must show:
a. (1) Severance of title to land held in common ownership
i. Common ownership - When one person held title to the entire land that was severed and transferred part of it to another person
b. (2) Existing, apparent, and continuous use when severance occurs; and
i. Existing - Owner use of one parcel to benefit the other parcel
ii. Apparent - Use was visible or discoverable through reasonable inspection, even if not readily visible
iii. Continuous - Parties likely expected the use to continue
c. (3) Reasonable necessity for the use at time of severance
i. Reasonable - Use was reasonably convenient to the dominant land
ii. Note: Timing is key - Elements must be satisfied at the time of severance
Easement by necessity
- Claimants must show:
a. (1) Severance of title to land held in common ownership
b. (2) Strict necessity for the easement at the time of severance
i. Traditional rule - Strict necessity requires the parcel to be landlocked with no other access to public roads or utilities
Prescriptive easement
- Claimants must show:
a. (1) Actual use
i. Use was as a true holder would use the easement - True holder
a. How do people use X in this community
b. (2) Open and notorious use
i. Use was visible and obvious such that a reasonable owner would be aware of the adverse use
c. (3) Adverse use
i. Use was without permission from owner of servient estate
d. (4) Continuous use
i. Use was continuous as a true holder would continuously use the easement
e. (5) Statutory period
i. Elements were satisfied for the statutory period
ii. Analyze even if not given statutory period
iii. Upper end of statutory period is 20 years
Easement by estoppel (irrevocable license)
- Claimants must show:
a. (1) License (temporary permission, revocable at any time), typically for access purposes
b. (2) Licensee’s good faith reliance through the expenditure of substantial money or labor
c. (3) Licensor’s knowledge or reasonable expectation that reliance will occur
Scope of easement
i. Intent
1. Scope of an easement depends on the intent of the original parties
ii. Reasonably necessary
1. In general, the scope of an easement permits an easement holder to do anything that is reasonably necessary for the full enjoyment of the easement, unless evidence provides otherwise
iii. Change in manner, frequency, or intensity
1. In general, easement holder may increase the manner, frequency, or intensity of an easement’s use so long as that increase does not unreasonably damage or interfere with the use or enjoyment of the servient estate
a. Change must unreasonably interfere such that the servient landowner is unable to use servient estate
b. Interference must be explicit and more than just “inconvenient”
Specific scenarios related to scope of easements
- Prescriptive easements
- Technological change
- Subdivision of dominant land
- Third party beneficiaries
Transferring express easements appurtenant
i. Servient land transferred
1. Notice required
a. Actual notice
i. Knowledge of prior interest in the real property
b. Record notice
i. Recorded in county records (even if party does not search for it)
c. Inquiry notice
i. Visible/apparent, so purchaser should have asked
ii. Everyone who buys land is expected to inspect the land physically and to review public records
ii. Dominant land transferred
1. Automatically runs with the land
Transferring express easements in gross
a. Commercial
1. 1. Transferred freely
2. Unless circumstances show that the parties “should not reasonably have expected” this result
b. Non-commercial
i. Not transferable unless the express easement provides otherwise
Transferring implied easements
Implied easements run with the land, unless terminated
Termination of easements
i. Terms of easement
1. Parties can include an express limitation on the easement, such as expiration date, term of years, or a condition
ii. Abandonment
1. Abandonment depends on the easement holder’s intent
2. Abandonment of an easement is established if:
a. Holder stops using the easement for a long period (for example, >50 years) and
b. Takes other actions that clearly show intent to relinquish the easement
iii. Merger
1. If one person obtains title to both the easement and the servient land, the easement terminates under the doctrine of merger
2. Easement cannot be terminated by merger if there are any future interests in the dominant or servient estate
3. Instead, use of the easement is suspended until future interest holder becomes entitled to possession
iv. Prescription
1. Servient landowner may terminate an easement by prescription based on the same elements of easement by prescription, except the servient owner must substantially interfere with the holder’s use of the easement
v. Estoppel
1. Easement ends if the servient owner substantially changes his position in reasonable reliance on the holder’s statement that the easement will not be used in the future
a. Substantial change in position
i. Money or labor
vi. Release
1. Easement holder may release the easement to the servient owner by executing and delivering a writing that complies with the statute of frauds
Duty to repair and maintain easements
i. Duty to repair and maintain an easement falls on the easement holder, not the servient estate owner (unless the parties agree otherwise)
ii. Servient-estate owner has a duty to contribute to the reasonable costs of repairs and maintenance if they also use the easement
Affirmative covenants
Affirmative covenants require the owner of the burdened property to perform some act or to pay money
Negative covenants
Negative covenants restrict how the burdened property may be used
Real covenant
i. Generally
1. A real covenant is a promise concerning the use of land that benefits and burdens both the original parties to the promise and their successor
ii. Remedy
1. Money damages
iii. Requirements for burden to run with the land
1. Statute of Frauds
2. Intent to bind successors
3. Touch and concern
4. Notice
5. Horizontal privity
6. Vertical privity
iv. Requirements for benefit to run with the land
1. Statute of Frauds
2. Intent to bind successors
3. Touch and concern
4. Vertical privity
Equitable servitude
i. Generally
1. An equitable servitude is a promise that, regardless of whether it runs with the land at law, equity will enforce against the successors of the burdened land unless the successor is a bona fide purchaser
ii. Remedy
1. Injunctive relief
iii. Requirements for burden to run with the land
1. Statute of Frauds or common plan
2. Intent to bind successors
3. Touch and concern
4. Notice
iv. Requirements for benefit to run with the land
1. Statute of Frauds or common plan
2. Intent to bind successors
3. Touch and concern
Statute of frauds (covenants)
a. Covenant must be in a document that satisfies the Statute of Frauds (signed, in writing)
b. Covenant may appear anywhere in chain of title
Common plan
a. Implied from common plan where developer imposed uniform restrictions on a subdivision in which all lots are burdened by restrictions even if they do not appear in the chain of title to every lot
b. Evidenced by:
i. Sales literature
ii. Statements by developer
iii. Percent of deeds with restrictions
c. Once common plan is established, every lot owner may enforce the covenant against every other lot owner
d. Note: only consider circumstances at time of conveyance
Intent (servitudes)
- Original parties must intend to bind their successors to the land
- Intent can either be express in writing or inferred from the circumstances
Touch and concern
Covenant must touch and concern the land. It must relate to the enjoyment, occupation, or use of the land.
Notice
- Actual
- Record
- Inquiry
Horizontal privity
- Requires the original parties to the covenant to have shared some interest in the land independent of the covenant
- Types of interests
a. Landlord-tenant
b. Cotenant
c. Owner of dominant and servient tracts of an easement
d. Grantor-grantee
e. Mortgagor-mortgagee
Phases of residential land transactions
i. (1) Negotiate and prepare a purchase and sale contract
ii. (2) Executory period between the purchase and sale contract and closing
iii. (3) Closing and post-closing issues
Vertical privity
- Burden
a. Vertical privity requires, for the burden to run, the successor to the land receive the entire estate held by the original promisor - Benefit
a. Vertical privity requires, for the benefit to run, the successor to the land receive either the entire estate or a smaller estate held by the original promisor
Types of listing agreements
- Open listing
a. Seller pays first broker to find a “ready, willing, and able buyer” - Exclusive listing
a. Broker is the only one authorized to find buyers, but no commission if the seller finds a “ready, willing, and able buyer”
i. Most common - Exclusive right to sell listing
a. Broker receives a commission even if anyone finds a “ready, willing, and able buyer”
Requirements for listing agreements
- Statute of Frauds
a. Writing
b. Signed
c. Essential terms
i. Identity of parties
ii. Price
iii. Description of property
Exceptions to the statute of frauds
a. Part performance
b. Estoppel
Marketable title
- Legal title to real property that is reasonably free from doubt
- Implied covenant and implied condition in purchase and sale contract
- If title is unmarketable, then buyer can rescind the purchase and sale contract; seller cannot rescind for unmarketable title
- Physical defect with land does not raise issue of marketable title; marketable title only applies to title defects
Title unmarketable
- Problem with title to real property
a. Less property interest than identified in purchase contract
b. Subject to encumbrance (even if recorded, unless encumbrance is included in contract) - Risk of litigation due to:
a. Uncertainty regarding title (e.g., adverse possession)
b. Violation of law (e.g., violation of zoning code)
c. Violation of private covenant (e.g., violation of covenant limiting height) - Must be substantial problem; not immaterial defect
a. Substantial problems effect value of the property
b. Immaterial defect does not effect value; very minor
Title not unmarketable
- If parties agree to terms, for example:
a. Purchase contract says “no promises regarding marketable title”
b. Purchase contract explicitly lists the encumbrance or potential limitation
c. Zoning restrictions (unless violated)
d. Visible easement for roads, power lines, sewer pipes or other utilities - Physical defects
a. Marketable title concerns “title” to property, not the physical condition
Curing problems with title
If Buyer discovers a problem with title during the “executory period” (after the purchase and sale contract is signed but before closing), Seller generally has until closing to fix the problem with title
“Time is of the essence”
a. If the purchase and sale contract does not have a “time is of the essence” clause:
i. Seller still has a reasonable time to cure after closing date (often 1-2 months is considered reasonable)
ii. Generally, the longer the problem has been known to Seller, the less time is permitted after closing to cure
b. If the purchase and sale contract does have a “time is of the essence” clause:
i. Seller must provide marketable title at closing
ii. No reasonable time to cure
Duty to disclose defects
i. Generally
1. Duty arises before purchase and sale agreement is signed
ii. Seller’s duty
1. General duty to disclose
a. Seller has a duty to disclose defect if:
i. (1) Defect is known to the seller
ii. (2) Defect is not known or not readily discoverable by a buyer exercising due care and
iii. (3) Defect materially impacts the value of the contract
Scenarios that trigger seller’s duty
- Defect is known to seller
a. If seller has reasonable suspicion of a defect, they must disclose that defect - Not known or readily discoverable by a buyer exercising due care (latent defects)
a. Majority
i. Objective (reasonable person) standard
b. Minority
i. Subjective (special knowledge or experience of buyer) standard - Defect materially impacts the value ($$) of the contract
a. Majority
i. Reasonable person
b. Minority
i. Subjective standard - If seller knows about special circumstance, preference, or condition of buyer and do not disclose the relevant defect, in a minority of jurisdictions, the court would find that the defect materially impacts the value of the contract
“As-is” clauses (contract)
i. General
1. Residential
a. Majority
i. General “as-is” clause is not sufficient to overcome seller’s liability for failure to disclose or fraud
b. Minority
i. General “as-is” clause is enforceable
2. Commercial
a. Usually enforceable
ii. Specific
1. If the “as-is” clause identifies and disclaims liability for specific types of defects, it is likely to be upheld
Breach of purchase and sale contract
i. Seller or buyer breach
1. Refuse to go through with the transaction
ii. Seller’s breach (justifies buyer’s rescission and other remedies)
1. Failed to deliver marketable title
2. Failed to disclose when obligated to disclose
3. Failed to comply with any conditions included in the purchase contract
iii. Buyer’s breach (justifies seller’s rescission and other remedies)
1. Failed to comply with any conditions included in the purchase contract