Property Fall Final Case Facts Flashcards

1
Q

Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds Co Ltd. v. Taylor

A

Plaintiff company had a race track and defendant had an elevated platform on his land beside the track and watched the races and read the info that appeared on the boards, he would announce the races and results through the phone which were then broadcasted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

International News Service v Associated Press (INS v AP)

A
  • Plaintiff (AP) sought an injunction to stop INS from gathering the news they had and publishing it in their newspapers before AP could during WW1
  • AP wanted to establish a copyright in news
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Stewart

A
  • Accused was hired to get hotel employee info, he tried to bribe a security guard for it, security guard said no and reported the incident
  • Stewart charged with counselling a hotel employee to commit fraud and theft of information (criminal case)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Moore v Regents of the University of California

A
  • Moore diagnosed with cancer and underwent treatment at UCLA, his blood was distinctive and had potential for great commercial and scientific value
  • Defendant recommended M have his spleen removed and M consented
  • D took parts to research them and M was not informed
  • D applied for patent from the research that was predicted to be very valuable
  • M had to pay for travel and med expenses
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

JCM v ANA

A

Parties were spouses and conceived one child through therapeutic insemination, they separated (sperm straws not addressed in separation agreement) JCM wants them to conceive another child, ANA wants them all destroyed and wouldn’t be bought out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Saulnier v RBC

A

Appellant Saulier holds 4 fishing licenses (very valuable), signed a General Security Agreement with the Royal Bank which gave RBC a security interest in all personal property including intangibles, he defaulted on the loan and they want to count the licenses as property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Harrison v Carswell

A

Employee of a tenant of a shopping centre participated in a lawful strike and picketed peacefully, owner of the mall (Harrison) told Carswell picketing was not permitted in any area of the mall and if she didn’t leave she would be charged with trespass, she kept going and received 4 trespass charges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Committee for the Commonwealth of Canada v Canada

A

P wanted to distribute pamphlets in an Airport, Airport said no because of fed legislation preventing solicitation in the airport, P initiated action for infringement of freedom of expression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Pierson v Post

A
  • Post hunting a fox almost had it in sight when a saucy interloper appeared, killed the fox, and ran off with the carcass,
  • Post sued on the theory that his pursuit of the fox had established his property right to it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Perry v Gregory

A
  • Both were into metal detecting, did not share findings, on one expedition they found a valuable belt plate, P got the signal but D dug it up first
  • Expert says the first to get a signal owns the item unless they walk away from it (not the case here)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Young v Hitchens

A

Plaintiff (Y) was fishing using a large net, drawn net around large school (valuable), with gap in top 40 feet wide, before Y could close defendant (H) interfered with his own net and hauled off the catch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The Tubantia

A

Sunken ocean liner with gold coins in it, wreck was located, marked, obtained limited access and recovery efforts initiated by plaintiff then they had to leave before retrieving anything

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Armory v Delamire

A

Plaintiff found a jewel and brought it to defendants shop to see what it was, gave it to the apprentice who took stones out, boy wanted it back and they tried to give it back without the stones

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Bridges v Hawksworth

A

B went into H’s shop and found a small parcel of money, B asked H to keep the notes until the owner claimed them, H advertised for the owner but no one came, B asked for money and offered to pay expenses of H trying to find owner, H refused

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Elwes v Brigg Gas Co

A

P owns land and rents some to D, D finds boat beneath surface of the land and claims it, P and D had lease saying all minerals belong to P

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

South Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman

A

P hired D to clear mud from pool, D finds two gold rings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Hannah v Peel

A

D bought home but never lived in it, home was used by military in WW2, P worked for military and lived there, P found a loose broach in a crevice in a remote room of the house, P gave it to cops who gave it to D, D sold it, P sues for value of it as finder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

City of London Corporation v Appleyard

A
  • D’s workmen demoed a building and found money in a safe which was in one of the walls, lease between corporation and building owners preserved the corps right to any article of value found upon any remains of the former building
  • Workmen employed by building owners
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Grafstein v Holme and Freeman

A

D’s found a locked box at a shop they worked at, brought it to the shop owner and he told them to put it in the basement and leave it, they later went back and opened it and found a large sum of money, they claimed entitlement to it

20
Q

Parker v British Airways

A
  • P found gold bracelet on ground in executive lounge in airport, gave bracelet to agent of British Airways saying if true owner not found he wants it back
  • Owner never claimed it and it wasn’t returned to P, BA sold it
21
Q

Keron v Cashman

A

5 boys find sock and play with it, bursts and money comes out, P found it but they all held it at some point, owner not found so P claimed all the money, other boys want equitable division

22
Q

Edmunds v Ronella

A

2 boys found envelope with money in it while going through trash, older girl (R) came to boys assistance and brought it back with the boys to her house where her parents called the police who gave her a receipt as the “sole” finder, she claimed boys disclaimed interest in the money (they denied)

23
Q

Popov v Hayashi

A

At baseball game a ball went into crowd, ball first lands in webbing of P, because of mob P is knocked down and ball comes free, D sees loose ball and holds it in the air which is captured on camera, D is taken to secure area and is said to be the rightful owner

24
Q

Bird v Fort Frances

A

P crawls under building and finds can of money, takes it home and his mom and him hide it, cop learns of money and goes without a warrant and asks for money, mom gives it to him, no true owner found so money deposited in cities bank account, P asks for money D refuses saying P isn’t an honest finder

25
Q

Moffat v Kazana

A

P sold house to D, years later workers doing renos found a tin full of money in the chimney, D turned it over to the cops who gave it back, P claimed tin belonged to him that husband intentionally put it there but forgot about it

26
Q

AG of Canada v Brock

A

D driving and is stopped by cops, they find large sum of money in his car, D says its not his, cops take it, next day D says it is his then dies, his estate carries on action to get the money

27
Q

Irons v Smallpiece

A

Action in trover for 2 colts said to have been given to the plaintiff by his father under oral gift

28
Q

Cochrane v Moore

A

Benzon owns a horse and tries to gift Moore 1/4 of it and wrote a letter to Yates of this intention, Cochrane lent money to Benzon and in an attempt to repay promised him the horse, when the subject of Moore’s interest in the horse came up Cochrane said “I’ll take care of it”, Moore had no knowledge of the sale to Cochrane

29
Q

In re Cole

A

Purported gift of furniture from husband to wife, husband says “it’s all yours” and wife touches it, then he went bankrupt creditors want all personal belongings, husband and wife both handle and use the furniture

30
Q

Mackadie v Mackadie

A

gets paintings every b-day, taken off wall wrapped and put back up, when dad dies they are left to someone else

31
Q

Thomas v Times Book Co

A

Administrator of estate of P brought claim against D for manuscript, P lost this and said if D could find it he could keep it and gave him a list of places to look (said this in front of witnesses), D found it and told people P gave it to him before P died

32
Q

Watt v Watt

A

(Shirley (P) is not related they just have the same last name) D’s husband and marina owner built a boat, both S and the husband (H) had keys and S used it freely, H wrote a letter declaring the boat is jointly owned by him and S and gave the document to S, when D’s husband died Shirley wrote her with a claim to the boat

33
Q

Csada v Csada

A

P brought application to set aside 2 gifts he gave to his brother (2 valuable sections of land and a cheque), later requested return of gifts because of undue influence

34
Q

Re Zachariuc; Cheverier v Public Trustee

A

Old men were neighbours and best friends, Z gets sick and tells C he wants him to have all his possessions, Z gives C directions to find money under the house and gave him house key, Z dies and public trustee was going to tear house down C asks them to stop so he can get the money

35
Q

Heffron v Imperial Parking Co

A

P parked in D’s lot paying the evening flat rate charge, got a ticket saying hours and exculpatory clause, left keys in car as requested by D’s attendant, lot was marked with signs of same ex. clause, P came back an hour after lot closed car was missing and found 3 days later damaged, normal practice was to take keys of cars not claimed at closing to D’s lot across the street’s office

36
Q

Bata v City Parking Canada Ltd.

A

P parked in lot and left keys at request of attendant, car stolen, ticket given saying “charges are for use of parking space only”

37
Q

Palmer v Toronto Medical Parking

A

P just paid for spot, one snowy day the attendant took keys and parked the car for the P

38
Q

Minichiello v Devonshire Hotel

A

P left his car (and keys) with attendant, informed attendant there were “valuables” in the car, in the trunk there was a briefcase with 16k worth of jewels, briefcase disappeared

39
Q

Who’s super smart?

A

YOU!!!!!! :D

40
Q

The Pioneer Container

A

P contracted with freight carriers for carriage of goods from Taiwan to Hong Kong, freight had term that said they could subcontract “on any terms”, subcontracted to D who had term saying disputes heard in Taiwan, vessel sank, P sued in Hong Kong, D said stay of proceedings, limitations period expired in Taiwan

41
Q

Punch v Savoy’s Jewellers Ltd

A

P (A) brought ring to be repaired A doesn’t want to pick it up and jeweler (B) doesn’t want to deliver so B hires a courier (C) (sub-bailee). C not informed its valuable, ring disappears.

42
Q

Rawlinson v Mort

A

Church organ given by constructive delivery when giving inditia of title. Later put his hand on organ to solidify delivery. Expands delivery to include constructive delivery.

43
Q

Winter v Winter

A

Barge between father and son. Son acted as owner after promissory words, so the court recognized constructive delivery.

44
Q

Kilpin v Ratley

A

Mrs. Ratley’s father made a deal with his son in law’s creditors, and then gave the daughter the furniture. Verbal gifting was deemed sufficient, as the daughter had prior custody of the furniture. Possession satisfied delivery, as well as words acknowledging gift.

45
Q

Ashby v Tolhurst

A

P left car in D’s car park. Car stolen. Court holds it was a licensee relationship, which has no obligations towards chattel