Property Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Leasehold

A

A leasehold is an estate in land, under which the tenant has a present possessory interest in the leased premises and the landlord has a future interest (reversion).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Tenancies for Years

A

A tenancy for years continues for a fixed period of time. A tenancy for years is usually created by written leases. Under the Statute of Frauds, a writing is required if the lease is for more than one year. A tenancy for years ends automatically at its termination date. In most leases, the landlord reserves a right of entry, which allows him to terminate the lease if the tenant breaches any of the lease_s covenants. A tenancy for years may also terminate if the tenant surrenders the tenancy and the landlord accepts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Periodic Tenancies

A

A periodic tenancy continues for successive periods until terminated by proper notice by either party. A periodic tenancy can be created by (i) express agreement, (ii) implication, or (iii) operation of law. A periodic tenancy is automatically renewed until proper notice of termination is given. Usually, the notice must be one full period in advance and timed to terminate the lease at the end of a period. For a year-to-year lease, six months notice is usually required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Tenancies at Will

A

A tenancy at will is terminable at the will of either the landlord or the tenant. Generally, a tenancy at will must be created by an express agreement that the lease can be terminated at any time. If the lease gives only the landlord the right to terminate, a similar right will be implied in favor of the tenant (but not vice versa, i.e. there is no implied right to terminate in favor of the landlord). A tenancy at will may be terminated by giving notice and a reasonable time to quit by any party with the power to do so, or it may be terminated by operation of law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Tenancies at Sufferance

A

A tenancy at sufferance arises when a tenant wrongfully remains in possession after the expiration of a lawful tenancy. A tenancy at sufferance lasts only until the landlord takes steps to evict the tenant. No notice of termination is required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The Hold-Over Doctrine

A

If a tenant continues in possession after his right to possession has ended, the landlord may: (i) evict him, or (ii) bind him to a new periodic tenancy. Generally, the terms and conditions of the expired tenancy govern the new one. Residential tenants are generally held to a new month-to-month tenancy, regardless of the original term. If the landlord notifies the tenant before the lease expires that occupancy after the termination will be at increased rent, the tenant, by holding over, is held to have acquiesced to the new terms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Duty to Repair

A

A tenant cannot damage (i.e. commit waste on) the leased premises.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Types of Waste

A

(i) Voluntary (affirmative) waste results when the tenant intentionally or negligently damages the premises or exploits minerals on the property. (ii) Permissive waste occurs when the tenant fails to take reasonable steps to protect the premises from damage from the elements. The tenant is liable for all ordinary repairs, excluding ordinary wear and tear. If the duty is shifted to the landlord, the tenant has a duty to report deficiencies promptly. (iii) Ameliorative waste occurs when the tenant alters the leased property increasing its value. Generally, the tenant is liable for the cost of restoration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Duty to Not Use Premises for Illegal Purpose

A

If the tenant uses the premises for an illegal purpose, the landlord may terminate the lease or obtain damages and injunctive relief. Occasional unlawful conduct by the tenant does not breach this duty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Duty to Pay Rent

A

At common law, rent was due at the end of the leasehold term. The landlord is not permitted to retain a security deposit beyond the damages actually suffered. If a rent deposit is denominated a bonus, the landlord can retain it after the tenant is evicted. If a tenant effectively conveys his leasehold interest back to the landlord, his duty to pay rent ends.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Remedy if Tenant on Premises but Fails to Pay Rent

A

At common law, a breach of the lease, such as failure to pay rent, resulted only in a cause of action for money damages. Most modern leases, however, give the nonbreaching party the right to terminate. Thus, the landlord may bring suit for rent due or may evict the tenant under the state_s unlawful detainer statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Remedy if Tenant Abandons

A

If the tenant unjustifiably abandons the property, the majority view is that the landlord has a duty to mitigate damages by seeking to relet the premises. Amount of damages depends on surrender. If surrender is not found, the tenant is liable for the difference between the promised rent and the fair rental value of the property (or rent from reletting). If surrender is found, the tenant is free from any rent liability accruing after abandonment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

No Duty to Repair or Maintain

A

Subject to modification by the lease, a statute, or the implied warranty of habitability, the general rule is that a landlord has no duty to repair or maintain the premises.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Duty to Deliver Possession of Premises

A

Statutes in most states require the landlord to put the tenant in actual possession of the premises at the beginning of the leasehold term.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Quiet Enjoyment

A

Every lease has an implied covenant that neither the landlord nor a paramount title holder will interfere with the tenant_s quiet enjoyment and possession of the premises. This covenant may be breached by: (i) actual eviction, (ii) partial eviction, and (iii) constructive eviction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Actual Eviction

A

Actual eviction occurs when the landlord, a paramount title holder, or a hold-over tenant excludes the tenant from the entire leased premises. Actual eviction terminates the tenant_s obligation to pay rent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Partial Eviction

A

Partial actual eviction occurs when the tenant is physically excluded from only part of the leased premises. Partial eviction by the landlord relieves the tenant of the obligation to pay rent for the entire premises, even though the tenant continues in possession of the remainder. Partial eviction by a third person with paramount title results in an apportionment of rent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Constructive Eviction

A

If the landlord does something (or, more often, fails to provide a service he has a legal duty to provide) that renders the property uninhabitable, the tenant may terminate the lease and seek damages. The conditions must be the result of the landlord_s actions, and the tenant must vacate the premises within a reasonable time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Implied Warranty of Habitability

A

Most jurisdictions imply a covenant of habitability into residential leases. This warranty is nonwaivable. The landlord_s duty is tied to standards of local housing codes. In the event of a breach, the tenant may: (i) terminate the lease, (ii) make repairs and offset the cost against future rent, (iii) abate the rent to an amount equal to the fair rental value in view of the defects, or (iv) remain in possession, pay full rent, and sue for damages. [Keep in mind that the implied warranty of habitability does not apply to commercial tenants _ only to residential tenants.]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Retaliatory Evictions

A

In many states, a landlord may not terminate a lease or otherwise penalize a tenant in retaliation for the tenant_s exercise of her legal rights, including reporting housing or building code violations. Many statutes presume a retaliatory motive if the landlord acts within 90 or 180 days after tenant exercises her rights. To overcome the presumption, the landlord must show a valid nonretaliatory reason for his actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Discrimination

A

Tenants and potential tenants are protected by the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which bars racial or ethnic discrimination, and the Fair Housing Act, which bars discrimination based on ethnicity, religion, national origin, gender, and disability, as well as discrimination against families with children.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Assignments and Subleases

A

Absent an express restriction in the lease, a tenant may freely transfer her leasehold interest, in whole or in part. A complete transfer of the entire remaining term is an assignment. If the tenant retains any part of the remaining term (other than a right to reenter upon breach), the transfer is a sublease.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Consequences of Assignment

A

An assignee stands in the shoes of the original tenant in a direct relationship with the landlord; i.e. the assignee and the landlord are in privity of estate, and each liable to the other on all covenants in the lease that run with the land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Covenants that Run with the Land

A

A covenant runs with the land if the original parties to the lease so intend and if the covenant touches and concerns the land. (i.e. benefits the landlord and burdens the tenant (or vice versa) with respect to their interests in the property.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Rent Covenants

A

Because a covenant to pay rent runs with the land, the assignee owes rent directly to the landlord. After assignment, the original tenant is no longer in privity of estate with the landlord but remains liable on the original contractual obligation to pay rent (privity of contract). If the assignee reassigns the leasehold interest, his privity of estate with the landlord ends, and he has no liability for the subsequent assignee_s failure to pay rent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Consequences of Sublease

A

A sublessee is the tenant of the original lessee and usually pays rent to the original lessee, who then pays the landlord. A sublessee is not personally liable to the landlord for rent or for the performance of any of the covenants in the main lease unless the sublessee expressly assumes the covenants.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Landlord_s Remedies

A

The landlord may terminate the main lease for nonpayment of rent or breach of other covenants if the lease so states or the power is given by statute. The sublease automatically terminates with the main lease. Also, many states allow a landlord who does not receive rent to assert a lien on personal property found on the premises; this applies to a sublessee_s property as well as that of the original tenant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Rights of Sublessee

A

A sublessee cannot enforce any covenants made by the landlord in the main lease except a residential sublessee may be able to enforce the implied warranty of habitability against the landlord.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Covenants Against Assignment or Sublease

A

Lease covenants restricting assignment and sublease are strictly construed against the landlord. A valid covenant against assignment is considered waiver if the landlord was aware of the assignment and did not object. Once the landlord consent to one transfer, the Rule in Dumpor_s Case provides that he waives the covenant as to future transfers unless he expressly reserves it. If a tenant assigns or sublets in violation of a lease provision, the transfer is not void. The landlord, however, usually may terminate the lease or sue for damages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Assignments by Landlords

A

A landlord may assign the rents and reversion interest he owns. This is usually done by deed when the landlord conveys a building to a new owner. The tenants_ consent is not required. Once tenants are given reasonable notice of the assignment, they must recognize and pay rent to the new owner as their landlord. The benefit of all tenant covenants that touch and concern the land runs with the landlord_s estate to the new owner. The burdens of the landlord_s covenants that touch and concern the land runs with the landlord_s estate to the assignee; thus the assignee is liable for the performance of those covenants. The original landlord also remains liable on all of the covenants he made in the lease.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Condemnation of Leaseholds

A

If the entire leasehold is taken by eminent domain, the tenant_s liability for rent is extinguished because both he leasehold and reversion have merged in the condemnor and there is no longer a leasehold estate. The lessee is entitled to compensation. However, if the taking is temporary or partial, the tenant is not discharged from the rent obligation, but is entitled to compensation for the taking.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Landlord_s Liability

A

At common law, a landlord had no duty to make the premises safe. Today there are six exceptions for (i) concealed dangerous conditions, (ii) common areas, (iii) public use, (iv) furnished short-term residence, (v) negligent repairs by landlord, (vi) landlord contract to repair.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Concealed Dangerous Condition

A

If, at the time the lease is entered into, the landlord knows (or should know) of a dangerous condition that the tenant could not discover by reasonable inspection, the landlord must disclose (not repair) it. Otherwise, the landlord will be liable for any injuries resulting from the condition. If the tenant accepts the premises after disclosure, she assumes the risk for herself and others; the landlord is no longer liable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Common Areas

A

The landlord has a duty of reasonable care in maintaining common areas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Public Use

A

A landlord is liable for injuries to members of the public if, at the time of the lease, he: (1) knows or should know of a dangerous condition; (2) Has reason to believe the tenant may admit the public before repairing the condition; and (3) Fails to repair the condition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Furnished Short-Term Residence

A

A landlord who rents a fully furnished premises for a short period is under a stricter duty. He is liable for injuries resulting from any defect whether or not he knew of the defect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Negligent Repairs by Landlord

A

Even if a landlord has no duty to make repairs, a landlord who actually attempts to repair is liable if an injury results because the repairs are done negligently or give a deceptive appearance of safety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Landlord Contract to Repair

A

If the landlord covenants to repair, he is liable for injuries resulting from his failure to repair or negligent repair.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

General Duty of Reasonable Care for Landlords

A

Many courts are now holding that a landlord owes a general duty of reasonable care toward residential tenants, and will be held liable for injuries resulting from ordinary negligence if he had notice of a defect and opportunity to repair it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Fixtures In General

A

A fixture is a chattel that has been so affixed to the land that it has ceased being personal property and has become part of the realty. A fixture passes with the ownership of the land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Chattels Incorporated into Structure

A

When items are incorporated into the realty so that they lose their identity, they are fixtures, as are items that are identifiable but whose removal would cause considerable damage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Common Ownership Cases

A

A common ownership case is one in which the person who brings the chattel to the land owns both the chattel and the land. An item is a _fixture_ if the objective intention of the party who made the annexation was to make the item part of the realty. This intention is determined by: the nature of the article, the manner of attachment, the amount of damage that would be caused by its removal, and the adaptation of the item to the use of the realty. Constructive annexation results when an article of personal property is so uniquely adapted to the real estate that it makes no sense to separate it even if not physically annexed to the property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Divided Ownership Cases

A

In divided ownership cases, the chattel is owned and brought to the realty by someone other than the landowner. Accession describes the annexor_s intent to make chattels a permanent part of the real estate. This scenario is evinced primarily in three situations: landlord-tenant, life tenant and remainderman, and licensee or trespasser and landowner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Landlord-Tenant

A

An agreement between the landlord and tenant is controlling on whether an annexed chattel is a fixture. Absent an agreement, a tenant is deemed to lack the intent to permanently improve the property, and thus may remove his annexed chattels if removal does not substantially damage the premises or destroy the chattel. Annexed chattels must be removed by the end of the lease term (or within a reasonable time after the termination of an indefinite tenancy), and the tenant is responsible for repairing any damage caused by the removal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Life Tenant and Remainderman

A

The same rules apply in the life tenant-remainderman context as in landlord-tenant situations, except that the life tenant_s representative may remove annexations within a reasonable time after the life tenant_s death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

Licensee or Trespasser and Landowner

A

Licensees are treated much like tenants, whereas trespassers normally lose their annexations. Thus, absent a statute, an adverse possessor or good faith trespasser cannot remove fixtures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Easements

A

An easement holder has the right to use another_s tract of land for a special purpose, but has no right to possess or enjoy that land. An easement is presumed to be of perpetual duration unless the grant specifically limits the interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Affirmative Easements

A

Easement for which the holder is entitled to make affirmative use of the servient tenement.

49
Q

Negative Easements

A

Negative easements entitle the holder to compel the possessor of the servient tenement to refrain from engaging in an activity on the servient estate. Historically, negative easements were recognized only for light, air, lateral and subjacent support, and flow of an artificial stream. Today, negative easements are simply restrictive covenants.

50
Q

Easement Appurtenant

A

An easement is appurtenant when it benefits the holder in his physical use or enjoyment of another tract of land. There must be two tracts: the dominant tenement (the estate benefited by the easement), and the servient tenement (the estate subject to the easement right). An easement appurtenant passes with the transfer of the benefited land, regardless of whether it is mentioned in the conveyance. The burden of the easement also passes automatically with the servient estate unless the new owner is a bona fide purchaser with no actual or constructive notice of the easement.

51
Q

Easement in Gross

A

The holder of an easement in gross acquires a right to use the servient tenement independent of his possession of another tract of land; i.e. the easement benefits the holder rather than another parcel. An easement in gross for the holder_s personal pleasures is not transferable, but one that serves an economic or commercial interest is transferable

52
Q

Methods of Creating an Easement

A

(i) Express Grant. Any easement must be in writing and signed by the holder of the servient tenement unless its duration is brief enough to be outside of the Statute of Frauds. (ii) Express Reservation. An easement by reservation arises when a grantor conveys title to land but reserves the right to continue to use the tract for a special purpose. [applies only to the Grantor reserving powers for self]. (iii) Implication. An easement by implication is created by operation of law; it is an exception to the Statute of Frauds. There are three types. (iv) Prescription.

53
Q

Easement Implied from Existing Use (_Quasi-Easement_)

A

An easement may be implied if: (i) Prior to the division of a single tract; (ii) An apparent and continuous use exists on the _servient_ part; (iii) That is reasonably necessary for the enjoyment of the _dominant_ part; and (iv) The court determines that the parties intended the use to continue after division of the land.

54
Q

Easement Implied without any Existing Use

A

In two limited situations, easements may be implied without preexisting use: (i) Subdivision Plat. When lots are sold in a subdivision with reference to a recorded plat or map that also shows streets leading to the lots, buyers of the lots have implied easements to use the streets to access their lots. (ii) Profit a Prendre. The holder of the profit a prendre has an implied easement to pass over the surface of the land and to use it as reasonably necessary to extract the product.

55
Q

Easement by Necessity

A

An easement by necessity arises when a landowner sells a portion of his tract and by this division deprives one lot of access to a public road or utility line. The owner of the servient parcel has the right to locate the easement.

56
Q

Prescription

A

Acquiring an easement by prescription is analogous to acquiring property by adverse possession. To acquire a prescriptive easement, the use must be: (i) Open and notorious; (ii) Adverse; and (iii) Continuous and uninterrupted; (iv) For the statutory period. Generally, prescriptive easements cannot be acquired in public land.

57
Q

Stated Conditions

A

The original easement grant may specify when or under what conditions the easement will terminate.

58
Q

Unity of Ownership (Merger)

A

If the same person acquires ownership of both the easement and the servient estate, the dominant and servient estates merge and the easement is destroyed. Even though there may be later separation, the easement will not be automatically revived. The unity must be complete (e.g., the holder of the easement must acquire an interest in the servient tenement of equal or greater duration than the duration of the easement privilege).

59
Q

Release

A

An easement (including an easement in gross, which is otherwise inalienable) can be terminated by a deed of release from the owner of the easement to the owner of the servient tenement.

60
Q

Abandonment

A

An easement is extinguished when its holder demonstrates by physical action an intent to permanently abandon the easement. Merely expressing a wish to abandon does not extinguish the easement, neither does mere nonuse. However, oral expressions combined with a long period of nonuse may be sufficient.

61
Q

Estoppel

A

Oral expressions of an intent to abandon do not terminate an easement unless committed to writing or accompanied by action. But if the owner of the servient estate changes his position in reasonable reliance on the representations made or conduct by the owner of the easement, the easement terminates through estoppel.

62
Q

Prescription

A

To terminate an easement by prescription, there must be an adverse, continuous interruption of the use for the prescriptive period (typically 20 years).

63
Q

Necessity

A

Easements created by necessity expire as soon as the necessity ends.

64
Q

Condemnation and Destruction

A

Condemnation of the servient estate extinguishes all easements. Involuntary destruction of a structure in which there is an easement extinguishes the easement; voluntary destruction of such a structure does not.

65
Q

Licenses

A

Licenses privilege their holders to go upon the land of another. But unlike an easement, a license is not an interest in land, it is merely a privilege, revocable at the will of the licensor. A license is personal to the licensee, and thus is inalienable. Any attempt to transfer a license results in revocation by operation of law. [A failed attempt to create an easement results in a license.]

66
Q

Irrevocable Licenses

A

A license becomes irrevocable in the following circumstances: (1) Estoppel. If a licensee invests substantial amounts of money or labor in reliance on the license, the licensor is estopped to revoke. The license becomes an easement by estoppel, which lasts until the holder receives sufficient benefit to reimburse him for his expenditures. (2) License Coupled with an Interest. A license coupled with an interest is irrevocable as long as the interest lasts.

67
Q

Profits

A

Profits entitle the holder of the benefit to take some resources (e.g. soil, timber, etc.) from the servient estate. Implied in every profit is an easement entitling the benefit holder to enter the servient estate to remove the resources. All of the rules governing creation, alienation, and termination of easements are applicable to profits. In addition, a profit may be extinguished through surcharge (misuse that overly burdens the servient estate).

68
Q

Real Covenants

A

A real covenant, normally found in a deed, is a written promise to do something on the land or a promise not to do something on the land. Real covenants run with the land at law, which means that subsequent owners may enforce or be burdened by the covenants.

69
Q

Requirements for Burden to Run

A

If the following requirements are met, any successor in interest to the burdened estate will be bound y the covenant as if she had herself expressly agreed to it: (1) Intent (2) Notice (3) Horizontal Privity (4) Vertical Privity (5) Touch and Concern

70
Q

Intent

A

The covenanting parties must have intended that successors in interest to the covenantor be bound by the terms of the covenant. This intent may be inferred from circumstances surrounding the creation of the covenant, but is usually found in the language of the conveyance itself.

71
Q

Notice

A

Under modern recording acts, to be bound by a covenant, a subsequent purchaser for value must have had actual, inquiry, or record notice of the arrangement at the time of purchase. [Because the notice requirement arises under the recording acts, remember that it will protect only purchasers for value. Someone who does not give value may be bound by a covenant at law (not equity) even if he has no actual or constructive notice of the covenant.

72
Q

Horizontal Privity

A

At the time the promisor entered into the covenant with the promise, the two must have shared some interest in the land independent of the covenant. [Horizontal privity concerns only the original parties. Even if successors in interest are trying to enforce the covenant, you must look only to the original covenanting parties to determine horizontal privity].

73
Q

Vertical Privity

A

To be bound, the successor in interest to the covenanting party must hold the entire durational interest held by the covenantor at the time he made the covenant.

74
Q

Touch and Concern

A

Negative covenants touch and concern the land if they restrict the holder of the servient estate in his use of that parcel of land. Affirmative covenants touch and concern the land if they require the holder of the servient estate to do something, which increases his obligations in connection with his enjoyment of the land.

75
Q

Requirements for Benefit to Run

A

If the following three requirements are met, the promisee_s successor in interest may enforce the covenant: (i) Intent; (ii) Vertical Privity; and (iii) Touch and Concern

76
Q

Intent

A

The covenanting parties must have intended that the successors in interest to the covenantee be able to enforce the covenant.

77
Q

Vertical Privity

A

The benefits of a covenant run to the assignees of the original estate or any lesser estate; i.e., any succeeding possessory estate may enforce the benefit. [Horizontal privity is not required for the benefit to run. Thus, where horizontal privity is lacking, the promisee_s successor_s can enforce the covenant against the promisor, but not against the promisor_s successors.]

78
Q

Touch and Concern

A

The benefit of a covenant touches and concerns the land if the promised performance benefits the covanantee and her successors in their use and enjoyment of the benefited land.

79
Q

Equitable Servitudes

A

An equitable servitude is a covenant that, regardless of whether it runs with the land at law, equity will enforce against the assignees of the burdened land who have notice of the covenant. The usual remedy is an injunction. [The crucial difference between real covenants and equitable servitudes is the remedy sought. If money damages are sought, you must use the real covenant analysis. If a party seeks an injunction, you must consider whether the requirements for enforcement as an equitable servitude have been met. A single promise can create both a real covenant and an equitable servitude].

80
Q

Creation of Equitable Servitudes

A

Generally, as with real covenants, equitable servitudes are created by covenants contained in a writing that satisfies the Statute of Frauds. There is one exception: Negative equitable servitudes may be implied from a common scheme for development of a residential subdivision. Thus, if a developer subdivides land, and some deeds contain a negative covenant while others do not, the negative covenants will be binding on all parcels provided there was a common scheme of development and notice of the covenants.

81
Q

Common Scheme

A

Reciprocal negative servitudes will be implied only if, at the time that sales in the subdivision began, the developer had a plan that all parcels would be subject to the restriction. The scheme may be evidenced by: (i) a recorded plat, (ii) a general pattern of restrictions, or (iii) oral representations to early buyers. [If the scheme arises after some lots are sold, no implied servitude can arise with respect to the lots already sold].

82
Q

Notice

A

To be bound by a covenant not in her deed, a grantee must have had notice of the covenants in the deeds of others in the subdivision. Notice may be actual (direct knowledge of covenants), inquiry (neighborhood appears to conform to common restrictions), or record (prior deed with covenant in grantee_s chain of title).

83
Q

Requirements for Burden to Run

A

A successor of the promisor is bound if: (i) The covenanting parties intended that the servitude be enforceable by and against assignees; (ii) The successor of the promisor has actual, inquiry, or record notice of the servitude; and (iii) The covenant touches and concerns the land.

84
Q

Requirements for the Benefit to Run

A

The benefit of an equitable servitude runs with the land, and thus is enforceable by the promisee_s successors, if: (i) the original parties so intended, and (ii) the servitude touches and concerns the benefited property. [In contrast to real covenants, which require vertical and horizontal privity of estate for burdens to run, and vertical privity for benefits to run, no privity of estate is required for an equitable servitude to be enforceable by and against assignees.]

85
Q

Equitable Defense to Enforcement

A

A court will not enforce an equitable servitude if: (a) The person seeking enforcement is violating a similar restriction on his own land (unclean hands); (b) A benefited party acquiesced in a violation of the servitude by one burdened party; (c) A benefited party acted in such a way that a reasonable person would believe the covenant was abandoned (estoppel); (d) The benefited party fails to bring suit within a reasonable time (laches); or (e) The neighborhood has changed so significantly that enforcement would be inequitable.

86
Q

Party Walls and Common Driveways

A

Courts will treat a wall erected partly on the property of each of two adjoining landowners as belonging to each owner to the extents it rests upon her land. Courts will imply mutual cross-easements of support, with the result that each party can use the wall or driveway and neither party can unilaterally destroy it.

87
Q

Incidental Rights Generally

A

An owner of real property has the exclusive right to use and possess the surface, the airspace, and the soil of the property.

88
Q

Lateral Support

A

Ownership of land includes the right to have the land supported in its natural state by adjoining land.

89
Q

Support of Land in Natural State

A

A landowner is strictly liable if his excavation causes adjacent land to subside.

90
Q

Support of Land with Buildings

A

An adjacent landowner is strictly liable for damage to land and buildings caused by excavation only if it is shown that the land would have collapsed in its natural state. Otherwise, he is liable for such damage only if his excavation was done negligently.

91
Q

Subjacent Support

A

An underground occupant of land must support the surface and buildings existing on the date the subjacent estate was created. Liability for subsequently erected buildings requires negligence.

92
Q

Watercourses (Streams, Rivers, and Lakes)

A

There are two major systems for determining allocation of water in watercourses: the riparian doctrine and the prior appropriation doctrine. A boundary line also can be affected by accretion or avulsion.

93
Q

Riparian Doctrine

A

Under this doctrine, the water belongs to those who own the land bordering the watercourse. Riparian rights attach to all contiguous tracts held by the same owner as long as one abuts the water. Riparian owners can use water only in connection with the riparian parcel.

94
Q

Natural Flow Theory

A

Under this theory, a riparian owner_s use resulting in substantial or material diminution of the water_s quality, quantity, or velocity is enjoinable.

95
Q

Reasonable Use Theory

A

All riparians share the right of _reasonable use_ of the water. In determining reasonable use, courts balance the utility of the owner_s use against the gravity of harm. Six factors are helpful in making this determination: alteration of flow, purpose of use, pollution, extent of use, destination of water taken, and miscellaneous conduct that may give rise to litigation.

96
Q

Prior Appropriation Doctrine

A

Individuals acquire rights by actual use. Appropriative rights are determined by priority of beneficial use. If there is a decrease in flow, priority is accorded in terms of time of appropriation. An appropriative right can be lost by abandonment.

97
Q

Groundwater (Percolating Water)

A

Four doctrines determine rights in diffuse underground water recovered through wells. (1) Absolute Ownership Doctrine, (2) Reasonable Use Doctrine, (3) Correlative Rights Doctrine, and (4) Appropriative Rights Doctrine.

98
Q

Absolute Ownership Doctrine

A

The owner of overlying land can take all the water she wishes, for any purpose, including export.

99
Q

Reasonable Use Doctrine

A

Much akin to absolute ownership, but exporting is allowed only if it does not harm other owners who may have rights in the same aquifer.

100
Q

Correlative Rights Doctrine

A

Owners of overlying land own the underground water basin as joint tenants, and each is allowed a reasonable amount for his own use.

101
Q

Appropriative Rights Doctrine

A

Priority of use (not ownership of overlying land) is determinative.

102
Q

Restatement Approach

A

A surface owner may pump groundwater unless it (i) unreasonably harms neighboring landowners, (ii) exceeds the pumper_s reasonable share, or (iii) directly and substantially affects surface waters and unreasonably harms surface water users.

103
Q

Surface Waters

A

A landowner can use surface water within her boundaries for any purpose she desires. Questions on surface water usually concern liability for changing natural flow by dikes, drains, etc. Liability depends on which theory the state follows: (1) natural flow theory, (2) common enemy theory, and (3) reasonable use theory. [Remember, these theories apply to redirecting surface water. A landowner can capture as much surface water as he wisehs.]

104
Q

Natural Flow Theory

A

Owners cannot alter natural drainage pattern.

105
Q

Common Enemy Theory

A

An owner can take any protective measures to get rid of the water. The rule has been modified by many courts to prohibit unnecessary damage to others_ lands.

106
Q

Reasonable Use Theory

A

There is a growing trend to apply this theory, which involves balancing the utility of the use against the gravity of the harm.

107
Q

Rights in Airspace

A

The right to airspace above a parcel is not exclusive, but the owner is entitled to freedom from excessive noise.

108
Q

Right to Exclude _ Remedies of Possessor

A

The possessor of real property has the right to exclude others. His remedies for invasions include actions for: (1) Trespass (land invaded by tangible physical object); (2) Private Nuisance (land invaded by intangibles such as odors or noise); (3) Continuing trespass (land repeatedly invaded by trespasser); and (4) Ejectment or unlawful detainer to remove a trespasser or tenant. This action can be joined with a demand for money damages.

109
Q

Cooperatives

A

In a cooperative, title to the land and buildings is held by a corporation that leases individual apartments to its shareholders. Because of their economic interdependence and because the individual owners are regarded as tenants, a direct restraint on the alienation of an individual interest is valid.

110
Q

Condominiums

A

In a condominium, each owner owns the interior of his individual unit plus an undivided interest in the exterior and common areas. Because condominium unit ownership is treated as fee ownership, the ordinary rules against restraints on alienation apply.

111
Q

Zoning

A

The state may enact statutes to reasonably control the use of land for the protection of the health, safety, morals and welfare of its citizens. The zoning power is based on the state_s police power and is limited by the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, and the _no taking without just compensation_ clause of the Fifth Amendment. Cities and counties can exercise zoning power only if so authorized by a state enabling act. [Zoning ordinances are generally invalid if they have no reasonable relation to public welfare, are too restrictive, are discriminatory as to a particular parcel, are beyond the grant of authority, violate due process, or are racially disc.]

112
Q

Nonconforming Use

A

A use that exists at the time of passage of a zoning act that does not conform to the state cannot be eliminated at once. Amortization is the gradual elimination of such uses.

113
Q

Special Use Permit

A

A special use permit is one that must be obtained even though the zoning is proper for the intended use.

114
Q

Variance

A

A variance is a departure from the literal restrictions of a zoning ordinance granted by administrative action.

115
Q

Unconstitutional Takings and Exactions

A

A zoning ordinance may so reduce the value of real property that it constitutes a taking under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. If the ordinance constitutes a taking, the local government must pay damages to the landowner equal to the value reduction. If the ordinance regulates activity that would be considered a nuisance under common law principles, it will not be a taking even if it leaves the land with no economic value.

116
Q

Denial of All Economic Value

A

A regulation that deprives the owner of all economic use of his land constitutes a taking (unless the use was prohibited by nuisance or property law when the owner acquired the property).

117
Q

Denial of Nearly All Economic Value

A

Balancing test. If a regulation leaves property with very little economic value, to determine if there was a taking the court will balance: (i) the social goals of the regulation, (ii) the diminution in value of the property, and (iii) the owner_s reasonable expectations for use of the property.

118
Q

Unconstitutional Exactions

A

Local governments often demand, in exchange for zoning approval for a new project, that the landowner give up some land for public purpose, such as street widening. However, such demands are unconstitutional under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments unless the government proves: (i) the government demands are rationally connected to an additional burden the project will place on public facilities or rights; and (ii) the dedication is reasonable related in nature and extent to the impact of the proposed development.

119
Q

Remedy

A

If a regulation constitutes a taking, the government will be required either to compensate the owner for the property or to terminate the regulation and pay the owner damages for the temporary taking.