PROPERTY Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

DEFEASIBLE FEES

A

A fee simple estate of potentially infinite duration that can be terminated upon the occurrence of some specified event
-i.e., an estate with a remainder vested in some person, who may lose the vested interest upon the occurrence of some event
-Requires clear words of intent for the remainder to vest
—-> Words of desire, hope, or aspiration are insufficient

Three types of defeasible fees:

(1) Fee Simple Determinable – Property automatically reverts back to the grantor upon the happening of a given event
—->Accompanying future interest = possibility of reverted (retained by the grantor)

(2) Fee Simple subject to condition subsequent – grantor retains power to terminate grantee’s estate (grantor must take action to terminate; does not occur automatically)
—-> Accompanying future interest = right of reentry (retained by grantor)

(3) Fee Siple Subject to an Executory Interest – property automatically transfers to a third party (i.e., someone other than the grantor) upon the happening of a given event
—>Accomapnying future interest = shifting executory interest (retained by the third party)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

FEE SIMPLE DETERMINIBLE

A

Property automatically terminates and reverts back to the grantor upon the happening of a given event or condition

Characteristics:
>Automatic forfeiture - Upon the occurrence of the given event or condition, the grantee automatically forfeits the estate
>Potentially Infinite - duration can be infinite so long as the event or condition does not occur
>Transferability - alienable, devisable, and descendible
—-> Absolute restraints on alienation are void

Creation - requires clear durational language
>Phrases such as “for so long as,” “while,” “during,” “until,” etc.
—>E.g., “to A for so long as he practices law”
> If A stops practicing law, the property automatically reverts back to the grantor
>Words of desire, hope, or aspiration are insufficient

Accompanying future interest = possibility of reverted
>Grantor retains the possibility of reverter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

FEE SIMPLE SUBJECT TO CONDITION SUBSEQUENT

A

The grantor retains the power to terminate the grantee estate upon the happening of some given event or condition

Characteristics:
>Forefeiture not automatic - if the event or condition occurs, the grantee still retains title until the grantor takes some action to exercise his right of reentry
—>Distinguish from fee simple determinable
>Potentially infinite - duration can be infinite so long as the event or condition does not occur
>Transferability - alienable, devisable, and descendible, subject to the occurrence of the given event or condition
—> Absolute restraints on alienation are void

Creation - Clear durational language must carve out a right of reentry for the grantor
> E.g., “to A, but if he wins the lottery, grantor reserves the right to reenter and retake”
>Words of desire, hope, or aspiration are insufficient

Accompanying future interest = right of reentry
>Grantor retains the right of reentry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

FEE SIMPLE SUBJECT TO AN EXECUTORY INTEREST

A

Property automatically transfers to a third party upon the happening of a given event or condition

Characteristics:
>Automatic forfeiture - upon the occurrence of the event or condition, the estate automatically transfers to a third person
—>similar to a fee simple determinable, but ownership automatically transfers to a third person, not grantor
>Potentially infinite - duration can be infinite so long as the event or condition does not occur
>Transferability - alienable, devisable, and descendible, subject to the occurrence of the event or condition
—> Absolute restraints on alienation are void

Creation - clear durational language is required
>E.g., “To A, but if A is ever arrested, then to B”
>Words of desire, hope, or aspiration are insufficient

Accompanying future interest = shifting executory interest
>The third party holds the shifting executory interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

LIFE ESTATE

A

An interest that lasts only for the life of the interest holder
>i.e., does not terminate at a fixed or computable time
>Typically measured by the life of the grantee
—>E.g., O grants “To A for life”; A, the life tenant has an estate in the land until A dies; then reverts to O
>Life estate pur autre vie - life estate measured by the life of another person (i.e., one other than the life tenant)
—->E.g., O grants “To A for the life of B”

Doctrine of Waste - Concerns rights/duties of life tenant (LT)
>LT cannot injure interests of remainder/reversion-holder
>Affirmative (voluntary) waste - LT cannot consume or exploit natural resources, except:
(a) Where necessary for repairs or maintenance of land
(b) When the grant expressly gives the right to exploit
(c) If the land was used for exploitation before grant
—->Opoen mines doctrine - if extraction of materials was done on land before life estates began, LT may only extract from mines already open.
>Permissive waste - LT must repair/maintain property up to the extent of income/profits derived from land or rental value of the land; failure to do so is a permissive waste.
>Ameliorative waste - acts that economically benefit land’s value; usually permitted under modern authorities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

FUTURE INTERESTS

A

Two categories of future interests:

(1) Future interests in the grantor
(d) Possibility of reverter
> Accompanies a fee simple determinable
(e) Right of reentry/power of termination
> Accompanies a fee simple subject to a condition subsequent
(f) Reversion
> Default future interest for grants of an estate smaller than a fee simple, such as life estates
> E.g., “to A for life” or to A for 99 years”

(2) Future interests in grantees or third person
(a) Vested remainder – Three types:
i. Indefeasibly vested remained
ii. Vested remainder subject to total divestment
iii. Vested remainder subject to open
(b) Contingent remainder
(c) Executory interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

REMAINDERS

A

A future interest in a third person arises immediately upon the termination of the preceding estate.

Characteristics:
>Expressly created in the same conveyance in which the preceding estate is created
>Cannot cut off or divest an interest held by a prior transferee
>Alienable, devisable, and descendible

Categories of remainders:
(1) Vested remainders - three types:
(a) Indefeasibly vested remainders
(b) Vested remainder subject to total divestment/executory limitation
(c) Vested remainder subject to open

(2) Contingent remainders - arise if:
(a) There is a condition precedent to the future interest becoming possessory
(b) The future interest vests in an unascertained taker
(c) both (a) and (b)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

VESTED REMAINDER

A

A reminder that automatically becomes possessory upon the natural expiration of the preceding estate
>Limitations - vested remainders cannot:
(a) Be subject to any condition precedent
(b) Vest in an unknown or ascertained person

Three types of vested remainders:

(1) Indefeasibly vested remainder - becomes possessory immediately upon termination of the prior estate

(2) Vested remainder subject to total divestment - subject to some subsequent condition, such that the remainderman could be divested after taking possession
—>E.g., “to A for life, remainder to B; but if B weds, to C”

(3) Vested remainder subject to open (class gift) - remainder vested in a described class of takers, at least f one whom is capable of taking possession (i.e., by virtue of being alive)
—> Not subject to any condition precedent
—> Open vs. closed class - class remains open to allow for future class members (anyone who satisfies class description e.g., “children of A”) and closes when additional class members are impossible
—>Rule of convenience - class closes whenever any class member can call for distribution of her share; does not apply if it conflicts with the grantor’s expressed intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

CONTINGENT REMAINDERS

A

A remainder will be contingent if it is either (a) subject to a condition precedent, or (b) created in favor of an unascertained or unborn person.

Subject to condition precedent - remainder’s taking subject to a condition precedent, i.e., contingent as to an event
>Once the grantee satisfies the contingency, the interest automatically becomes an indefeasibly vested remainder
>E.g., “to A for life, then to B and his heirs when B gets married”
—> If B is unmarried at the time of the conveyance, A has a life estate, B has a contingent remainder (b/c marriage is a condition precedent), and the grantor has a reversion in case B is not married when A dies

Subject to unborn or unascertained persons - the remainder is contingent if created in favor of unborn or unascertained persons
>The remainder is contingent on the grantee becoming born or ascertained
>E.g., “to A for life, then to B’s heirs”
—>if B is alive upon conveyance, the remainder is contingent b/c heirs of B cannot be ascertained until B dies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

RULE OF DESTRUCTIBILITY, MERGER (SHELLY’S RULE), & THE DOCTRINE OF WORTHIER TITLE

A

Rule of destructibility - at common law, a contingent remainder is destroyed if it remains contingent (i.e., the condition is not satisfied) when the preceding estate ends
>E.g., O grants “to A for life, then to B once he goes to law school.: A dies and B has not gone to law school
—>At common law, B gets nothing upon A’s death
>Modern rule - gives a reversion to the grantor or grantor’s heirs until the grantee satisfies the condition

Merger (Shelly’s Rule) - O grants “to A for life, then to A’s heirs” and A is alive
>At common law, the remainder merges and A has a fee simple absolute
>Modern rule - A has a life estate and A’s heirs have contingent remainders
—>O has a reversion b/c A could die without heirs

The doctrine of worthier title - O conveys “to A for life, then to O’s heirs”
>The contingent remainder in O’s heirs is void; A instead has a life estate and O has reversion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

EXECUTORY INTEREST

A

A future interest in a third party that takes effect by cutting short some interest - two types: shifting and springing
>Includes any future interest that is not a remainder
>Look for phrases like “but if,” “then to,” “for so long as,” etc.
>Executory interest holders lack standing to sue for waste

Shifting executory interest - always follow a defeasible fee
> Cuts short someone other than the grantor
>E.g., “to A and his heirs, so log as the property is used for storage. But if used for any other purpose, to B and his heirs
—->A has a fees simple subject to an executory interest
—>B has a shifting executory interest - if A stops using the property for storage A’s interest is cut short (not the grantors)

Springing executory interest - cuts short the interest of the grantor or his heirs
>E.g., “ to A, if and when he gets married
—>A has an executory interest
—>Grantor has a fee simple subject to an executory interest; if A gets married, possession springs from grantor to A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

RULE AGAISNT PERPETUITIES (RAP)

A

No property interest is valid unless it must vest, if at all, no later than 21 years after the death of a life in being at the time the interest was created.
>i.e., a future interest is void if there is any possibility, no matter how remote, that it will vest more than 21 years after the death of the measuring life
–> The measuring life = a life “in being” at the time the interest was created

> RAP applies to:
(a) Contingent remainders
(b) Executory interests
(c) Vested remainders subject to open
(d) Options and rights of first refusal
(e) Powers of appointment

Analyzing a conveyance subject to RAP
(1) Determine the interest being granted
(2) Apply RAP to any interest for which RAP applies
(3) If the conveyance violates RAP, strike only the violating portion
–>What remains = the new conveyance

**Many states have reformed the common law RAP, providing for an alternative vesting period greater than 21 years
> Unless instructed otherwise, apply common law RAP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING RAP

A

Rights of first refusal - contingent interests in property (i.e., options and rights of first refusal) violate RAP if they could be exercised outside the time allowed by RAP

Class gifts & RAP - for class gifts to satisfy RAP, class must be closed with all conditions precedent satisfied for every member
>Rule of convenience for class gifts may save a class conveyance that would otherwise violate RAP
> Examples of RAP violations:
(1) Age contingency beyond 21 - if the class conveyance is contingent on members reaching 21 it violates RAP
(2) Fertile octogenarian- presumption that women are capable of having children regardless of her age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

TENANCY IN COMMON

A

An estate with multiple tenants in which co-tenants own an individual part and each has a right to possess the whole

Characteristics:
>Freedly transferable - each interest is freely descendible, devisable, and alienable
>Co-tenants only share the right to possession
>No survivorship rights - co-tenants rights can be transferred to heirs upon their death
>Partition - a co-tenant can force partition at any time and take sole ownership of her share in the estate while remaining parties hold their interest as tenants in common
>Modern law favors tenancy in common; it is the default concurrent estate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

JOINT TENANCY

A

Creation - four conditions must concurrently exist when the tenants take their interest:
(1) Time - JT must take interest at the same time
(2) Tile - JT must receive conveyance through the same instrument
(3) Interest - JT must take equal and identical interests
(4) Possession - JT must have equal possessory rights

> Express intent required - grantor must expressly intend to create a JT; otherwise, a tenancy in common is presumed
Right of survivorship - if one JT dies, surviving JTs automatically take equal possession of deceased JTs share
Transferability - alienable, but not advisable or descendible

Severance & Transfer of Interests:
>Severance - severance by any JT creates a tenancy in common with respect to severed interest
>Transfer of interest - a JT interest becomes a tenancy in common upon transfer; this does not destroy the entire joint tenancy if two or more JTs remain
>Mortgaging a JT - lien their (majority) v. title theory (minority
—>Lien theory Jurisdiction - JT can take a mortgage on her interest without severing JT (b/c no title passes to mortgagee)
—>Title theory jurisdiction - JT is severed if any JT takes a mortgage on her interest because title passes to the mortgagee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

TENANCY BY THE ENTIRETY

A

Marital estate, similar ro joint tenancy, but between husband and wife
>Created by conveyance to a married couple; requires the same four conditions as a JT (time, title, interest, possession)
>Spouses are co-tenants; tenancy by the entirety is presumed in any conveyance made jointly to husband and wife
>Only recognized in certain common law jurisdiction

Characteristics:
>Right to survivorship - property automatically passes to the surviving spouse
>No right of partition - One spouse may not unilaterally convey her interest; attempt to do so is invalid and will not destroy the tenancy
>Protected from creditors - creditors of one spouse cannot reach that spouse’s interest; only creditors of the couple (i.e., joint creditors) can reach a tenancy by the entirety

Severance- four ways to sever
(1) Death of one co-tenant
(2) Mutual Agreement of the parties in writing
(3) Issuance of a divorce decree
(4) Execution by a joint creditor (e.g., foreclosure)

17
Q

LAND SALE CONTRACTS & CONVEYANCE

A

Land Sale Contracts - subject to the SOF and must be:
(1) In writing
(2) Signed by parties to be bound
(3) Articulate the essential terms (e.g., consideration to be paid, description of the land)

Exception - Partial Performance
> A land sale contract is outside the SOF if the buyer takes possession of the land and either:
(a) Pays all or part of the purchase price, or
(b) Makes substantial improvements

Land Sale Process:
(1) Contract - agreements to buy/sell land
(2) Escrow period - transfer of funds through escrow
(3) Closing - escrow completion to deed transfer
(4) Conveyance - successful deed transfer, upon which property is conveyed to the new owner

18
Q

EQUITABLE CONVERSION & RISK OF LOSS IN LAND SALE CONTRACTS

A

Equitable Conversion - during escrow (after the land sale contract but before deed delivery), the buyer owns the real property, but the seller owns the personal property (the right to proceeds of the sale)
>Seller holds legal title in trust for the buyer

Death of a party - if the buyer or seller dies before closing, rights to the contract pass according to the interest held
>Seller interest passes as personal
—>I.e., sellers heirs can sue for sale proceeds
>Buyers interest passes as real property
—> Buyers heirs can sue for delivery

Risk of loss - if the property is destroyed before closing through no fault of the parties, the buyer bears the risk of loss
>Parties can contract differently
>Seller must credit any insurance proceeds from the loss against the purchase price.

19
Q

Co-tenant’s Rights & Duties

A

The following rules apply to concurrent estate tenants
(1) Posession - each co-tenant has rights to possess the whole
(2) Rent from a co-tenant in exclusive possession - a co-tenant in exclusive possession is not liable to co-tenants for rent
(3) Rent fro third parties - a co-tenant leasing premises out must account to co-tenants for their share of rental income
(4) Adverse Posession - tenants my not acquire title tot he exclusion of co-tennts through adverse possession
(5) Carrying costs - each tenant is responsible for his fair share of taxes, interests, etc.
(6) Repairs - co-tenants may seek contribution for reasonable repairs, but must inform co-tenants before making repairs
(7) Improvements - no right to contribution for improvements; but co-tenants are entitled to credit for an increase in value attributable to the improvement (and also liable for any resulting loss
(8) Waste - a co-tenant can bring an action for waste against another co-tenant during the life of the tenancy
(9) Partition/forced sale - JT’s and tenants in common may bring an action for partition, or seek a forced sale and appropriation the proceeds.

20
Q

IMPLIED PROMISES IN LAND SALE CONTRACTS: MARKETABLE TITLE & STATEMENTS OF MATERIAL FACT

A

Every land sale contract contains two implied promises:

(1) Promises to provide a marketable title
—>Promises that title is free from risk of litigation
—>Defects rendering title unmarketable:
(a) Acquired by adverse possession
(b) Encumbered by interests (e.g., servitude, mortgage, future interest); but seller has the right to satisfy outstanding mortgagees or liens with sale proceeds
(c) Zoning ordinance violations existing at sale

(2) Promises to disclose & make no material false statements
>Seller must not materially misrepresent facts or make false statements concerning the property
—> Seller must disclose latent material defects
—> Seller cannot limit liability through disclaimers
—> New property - seller/builder is subject to an implied warranty of fitness/quality in construction

Remedy for breach - buyer must notify seller before closing and give reasonable time for the seller to cure defects
>If the seller fails to cure, the buyer can rescind, file for damages, demand specific performance, or file suit to quiet the title
>If the buyer fails to notify the seller before closing, the contract merges with the deed and the seller is not liable

21
Q

DEEDS

A

A deed passes legal title from the seller to the buyer

Requirements - to be effective, a deed must be:
(1) Lawfully executed - deed must be signed by the grantor and must reasonably identify the parties and the land
(2) Delivered - requires intent to be bound by the conveyance
- Title passes upon effective delivery; cannot be rescinded
- Present intent controls; physical transfer not required
- Acceptance - The grantee must accept the deed; acceptance is usually presumed upon valid delivery
-Rejection by grantee = ineffective delivery

Three types of deeds:
(1) General Warranty - includes six covenants for title
(2) Special warranty - Grantor assures that:
(a) he has not conveyed the land to another
(b) The land is free from encumbrances made by the grantor
(3) Quitclaim - transfers whatever interest grantor purports to have in property

22
Q

GENERAL WARRANTY DEEDS & COVENANTS FOR TITLE

A

General warranty deeds include six covenants for title:

Present covenants (only breached at the time of delivery):
(1) Seisin - grantor covenants that he is the rightful owner (i.e., has title, possession) and that the deed covers the described land
(2) Right to convey - grantor covenants that he has the right to convey
(3) Against encumbrances - grantor covenants that the land is free from encumbrances (e.g., servitudes, mortgages)

Future covenants (only breached after delivery):
(4) Quiet enjoyment - grantor covenants that grantee will not be disturbed by a third party’s claim of lawful title
(5) Warranty - grantor agrees to defend against lawful claims of title by others
(6) Further assurances - grantor promises to perform future acts reasonably necessary to perfect the title conveyed.

23
Q

BONA FIDE PURCHASERS FOR VALUE

A

A BFP purchases property for value (i.e., gives pecuniary consideration) without notice of prior conveyance.

Purchasers:
> Include mortgagees for value
>Does not include donees, heirs, or devisees
—> Not protected by the recording statutes unless the shelter rule applies

Notice - A buyer has notice of a prior conveyance by:
>Actual notice - actual knowledge from any source
>Inquiry notice or constructive notice- what a reasonable inspection of the land would reveal (regardless of whether the buyer actually inspects)
>Record notice - KNowledge from a routine title search
—> E.g., a previous conveyance properly recorded in the chain of title (not a wild deed)

24
Q

RECORDING STATUTES

A

If a prior conveyance or interest is not recorded, a subsequent purchaser/mortgagee may be protected under a recording statute
> Level of protection depends on the type of recording statute

Notice Statutes - subsequent BFP always prevails
>Whether or not she recorded first, a subsequent BFP always prevails over a prior grantee who fails to record
>Sample language: “No conveyance or mortgage of an interest in land shall be valid against any subsequent purchaser for value without notice unless it is recorded.

Race-notice statutes - First subsequent BFP to record prevails
>Sample language: “No conveyance or mortgage of an interest in land shall be valid against any subsequent purchaser for value without notice thereof whose conveyance is first recorded”

Race Statutes - first grantee to record prevails, regardless of whether the buyer is a BFP
> E.g., a non-BFP purchaser who records first prevails over BFP
> Sample language: “ No conveyance or mortgage of an interest in land shall be valid against a subsequent purchaser whose conveyance is first recorded”

25
Q

CHAIN OF TITLE PROBLEMS: SHELTER RULE, WILD DEEDS ESTOPPEL BY DEED

A

Issues that can arise with recording statutes and chain of title

Shelter rule - one who takes from a BFP will prevail against any interest the transferor-BFP would have prevailed against, even if the transferee had actual notice of a prior conveyance
> Protect donees, heirs, or devisees of BFPs who cannot qualify as BFPs and would not otherwise receive protection under notice or race-notice statutes

Wild deed - a recorded deed unconnected to the chain of title (e.g., due to a clerk’s filing error)
>Recird notice cannot be derived from a wild deed.

Estoppel by deed - wh who conveys land in which she has no interest is estopped from denying the validity of the conveyance if she subsequently acquires the same interest
>Prevents one from fraudulently conveying land and later validly acquiring it (i.e., laundering title).

26
Q

LATERAL & SUBJACENT SUPPORT

A

Lateral Support:
> Ownership of land includes the right to have land supported in its natural state by adjoining land; landowners can be liable for excavations that cause damage to adjacent land
> P can bring claims under two types of liability
(1) Negligence - if the adjacent landowner’s excavation causes damage to developed land, the excavating owner is only liable if he acted negligently
(2) Strict liability - P must show his land would have collapsed, even if in its natural state due to D’s excavations

Subjacent Support:
> Underground (subjacent) structures must support surface structures existing when the subjacent estate was created
—> Subjacent owners are strictly liable for failure to support pre-existing surface structures
>Negligence standard applies for subjacent structures ercted prior to surface structures
>Subjacent structures inside parking garages, tunnels, mines, etc.

27
Q

WATER RIGHTS IN WATERCOURSES

A

Land bordering watercourses (natural or artificial bodies of water, e.g., lakes and rivers) is governed by either the riparian doctrine or the prior appropriation doctrine.

Riparian doctrine - water belongs to those who own land bordering the watercourse. Two theories:

(1) Reasonable use theory (majority) - riparian owners share rights to reasonable use and are reliable to the other owners if their use unreasonably interferes with either owner’s use
—>Balance utility of use vs. gravity of harm

(2) Natural flow theory (minority) - riparian owners may be enjoined for any use resulting in a substantial or material reduction in other’s water quantity or quality
> Natural users prevail over artificial uses (under both theories)

Prior appropriation doctrine - water rights are required by actual use
>Priority of beneficial use determines rights to water
—> E.g., the first individual to make a beneficial use of water (i.e., productive use) has superior legal rights to use it.

28
Q

WATER RIGHTS IN GROUNDWATER & SURFACE WATER

A

Groundwater - water beneath the surface not confined to a known channel (e.g., water in wells)
>Surface owner is entitled to make reasonable use of groundwater, but must not be wasteful (majority)

Surface water - water from rain, springs, or other runoff that has not yet reached a natural watercourse
>Landowners can generally use surface waters as they please but may be liable for interrupting its flow.
>Liabilty depends on which theory applies:
—> Natural flow theory - owners cannot unreasonably alter natural drainage
—>Common enemy theory - owners can do anything to change drainage or combat flow unless it causes unnecessary damage to other’s land
—>Reasonable use theory - utility of use is balanced against the gravity of harm from that use.