Prop 1 Flashcards
A Net Lease-
presumes the L will receive a fixed rent without deduction for repairs, taxes, insurance, or any other charges other than L income taxes o Not uncommon in long-term commercial leases, especially when they occupy the whole buiding
3x net lease – particular freesand commercial building (warehouse shop) Tenant assumes duty to pay rent, pay property taxes, insurance and maintain and repair
CL T Duty to Repair Structure
At common law, a lessee’s covenant to repair (or return, deliver in the same condition) property included an obligation to rebuild structures destroyed during the lease term, regardless of who’s fault it is.
Sublesee’s Duties, and What Damages Can L Recover for Sublesee
Ifthere is a sublease, there is an equitable relationship between T2 and the landlord
(the landlord can bring suit to recover in equity – no damages [rent] only injunctive relief).
The landlord would have to go after T1 to recover rent or anything under the lease.
- The sublessor remains liable to the original lessor for all covenants in the original lease.
- Similarly, the sublessee is liable to the sublessor for the covenants in the sublease.
- However, the sublessee has no obligations to the original lessor. If
L Authority to withhold Consent to Sublease CL - Modern (Silent Consent)
Klawans
Julian
(1) Old Common Law – Klawans Doctrine – Landlord can withhold consent for no reason or any reason. (overrulled by Restatemend (Second) of Property (2) Modern Trend – Julian Rule: Landlord can only withhold consent on reasonable grounds.
Reasonable grounds to withhold consent to sublet include:
(1)Tenants who are not financially able to pay rent (the intended transferee); (2)Tenants use of the land is not compatible (transferee’s intended use)
Ability to Sub/Asgn After L has excepted an assignment.
The landlord’s consent cannot be divided (you cannot consent to one sublease and not another). Consequently, the L’s consent to one assignment ends the restriction thereby making the lease freely assignable. This promotes the free trade of land. L may easily circumvent the rule by providing that consent to a particular assignment is not a waiver of the right to consent to subsequent assignments. The landlord’s acceptance of rent from a sublessee or assigneeconstitutes a waiver of consent-to-transfer clause.
Rule in Dumpor’s Case (Majority Rule)
A condition against assignment is “entire and indivisible,” and having once been waived, cannot be enforced again.
Fixtures- Elements
Actual and Constructive Annexation
Analysis
Something that was originally a chattel (personal property) but was annexed or used in connection with land, and is not regarded as part of the real property.
If Fixture was severed before conveyance or deed was issues it becomes a chattel again
Old English Cases focus on Annexation
American Courts look at Intention
Creation of a Fixture: For an object to become a fixture, three essential elements must occur:
1. Annexation to the realty, either actual or constructive.
- Degree of Physical Annexation (The greater the degree to physical annexation more likely to find its a fixture) (Attached to floor/Wall/embedded in soil- high degree/ EXTREME WEIGHT- suggests annexation)
- Ease of Removal without Damage
- Adaptation to use of particular Realty (Constructive Annexation)
- How essentual is fixture to use of property
- Local Customs (Hot water, furnace
- Did the person who annexed the chattels have a substantial and permanent interest in the land (e.g., owner of fee simple interest)?
- Adaptation or application to the use or purpose to which that part of the realty to which it is connected is appropriated
• When the particular object is clearly adapted to the use to which the realty is devoted,• Object placed on may become if it is necessary, or useful, adjunct to the realty, — Consider Purpose realty is devoted. - Intention to make the article a permanent accession to the freehold. Intent to make the item annexed to the realty is determined by the intentions of the parties regarding the following four factors:
exam argue for the annexation then continue the analysis with adaptation and intention Intention factors:
- Nature of articles
- Manner of annexation
- The injury if removal
- The completeness the chattel is integrated with the the land
- The Annexer’s relatitionship with the land
- Annexer’s Relation with the chattel such as owner
Tresspassers lose Annexation (in good faith, Accession Doctrine– L pays L)
Rules Apply to Life Tenant
Statute of Frauds Requirements to Transfer an Interest in Land
- Identity of parties
- Identity of subject matter
- Consideration
- Signature of Seller
Open Mines Doctrine
A life tenant has the right to continue operation of existing mines on the leased premises, but a remainderman can enjoin the opening of any new mines (i.e. voluntary waste).
Exception: if you have already had gold mining operation on it/tree cutting/ oil gas lease already there if conveyance is silent the default rule is it can continue (only that operation) (Gold mine, open silver mine? Maybe) (Gold mine start timber?? No)
Duty to Repair (CL)
Under common law estate theory, a landlord had no duty to repair the premises during the duration of the lease. This duty extended to repairs that kept the building wind and water tight. Note that, in contrast, the tenant had a duty not to commit waste, which included within it a duty to repair the premises.
Covenants-Horizontal Privity
Horizontal privity is the relationship that exists between the original covenantor and covenantee In most jurisdictions, horizontal privity is satisfied by a conveyance of land between the covenantee and covenantor, which occurs by the same deed that includes the covenant, or when the covenant is created in a lease or the transfer of an easement.
Covenants-Vertical Privity
Vertical privity is the relationship that exists between an original party to a running covenant and the successor in interest to the original party. For the burden to run, privity of estate will only exist when the holder of the servient estate transfers all of his interest in the servient estate to the new owner.
Doctrine of Accession
Under the doctrine of accession, one who in good faith applies labor to another’s property acquires title to the resulting project if this process (1) transforms the original item into a fundamentally different article or (2) greatly increases the value of the item.
Abandonment, Surrender and Acceptance CL - Modern
At common law, when a tenant abandons the premises, he is still liable for the rent for the entire term of the lease even if the landlord does nothing to attempt to relet the premises. majority- now require that the landlord make reasonable efforts to mitigate the damages by attempting to relet the premises. Successfully reletting the premises does not remove the liability of the original tenant for the costs of reletting and for the time in which the premises stood vacant. Tenant may also avoid liability for rent if it can be proven that landlord has accepted surrender of premises by re-entering and occupying the premises himself. Entering to make repairs after abandonment does not usually constitute acceptance the surrender.
A leasehold estate
Leasehold Estate? [202-203] (also called a nonfreehold estate) is a legal interest that entitles the tenant to immediate possession of designated land, for either a fixed period of time (e.g., five years) or for so long as the tenant (or lessee) and the landlord (or lessor) desire.
Term of Years Tenancy
The term of years tenancy endures for a designated period that is either fixed in advance (e.g., five years) or computed using a formula that is agreed upon in advance. This tenancy automatically expires when the agreed period ends, without any notice of termination.
Tenancy at Sufferance
Holdover Tenant
The tenancy at sufferance arises when a person in rightful possession of land wrongfully continues in possession after the right to possession ends. Most authorities agree that this is not technically an estate in land, but rather a convenient label. The landlord is free to evict the “tenant” at any time.
T’s Argument = T was in continued negotiations w/ L for rent and other terms which infers they were not happy w/ old lease terms. Therefore, the ct held they did not intend to keep old lease for yr-yr
The court states:
(1) Tenant’s possession of the premises after the termination of the lease, in and of itself, does not automatically bind them to a renewal of their original lease agreement;
(2) The common law rule of the year-to-year tenant does not apply where the possession is retained and the rent paid pending negotiations with respect to the renewal of the lease.
(3) General Rule: (majority) if the original lease term is greater than or equal to a year, then the holdover T lease becomes a year to year lease. Except if the parties intended otherwise.
(minority) it is automatically month to month
(4) Look at: timing of negotiations to determine intent, rzbl opportunity to relocate, infer reason why T is still there
Constructive Eviction
Difference in Remiedy of Const E v. IWH
Constructive eviction occurs when wrongful conduct of the landlord substantially interferes with the tenant’s use and enjoyment of the leased premises. (No Duty at CL- only CQE)
Analysis
- •A duty (a covenant in the lease);
- •LL’s breach of the duty;
- •notice from the tenant to LL that he has breached the duty (followed by no response);
- •results of “grave and permanent” character;
- •tenant’s vacation of the premises within a reasonable time (question of fact for jury).
- Must move out
Constructive Eviction Remedies
- Obligation to pay rent is suspended T
- Tenant may recover damages
IWH Remedies
- Tenant need not vacate in order to assert breach
- makes IWH more advantageous the CE (Requires T to Vacate Slum lords premise)
Constructive eviction is usually claimed as an affirmative defense against a suit for not paying rent and then as a counter-claim against the landlord for damages.
When arguing, T must give evidence to show the time it took to vacate was rzbl→ must move out in a reasonable amount of time…
functional equivalent of an actual eviction.
For example, if a Minnesota law requires the landlord to supply heat to a rented dwelling during the winter, then his failure to do is wrongful conduct which renders the dwelling unusable.
Partial Eviction
- evicted from part or any portion of leased premise
- by landlord
Rent abates entirely untill possession is restored (may stay in possession without paying rent)
If T is partially evicted by 3rd party with paramount title, T can terminate lease, recover damage, or receive a proportionate rent abatement
Abandonment & L’s Rights against T
An abandonment occurs when the tenant
(1) vacates the premises without justification,
(2) lacks the present intent to return, and
(3) defaults in the payment of rent.
- If tenant abandones and stops paying rent, this is an offer,
o If landlord doesn’t except
At common law, the landlord could choose among three options when the tenant abandoned:
(1) leave the premises vacant and sue later for accrued rent;
(2) mitigate damages by reletting the premises to a new tenant and then sue the original tenant for the unpaid balance; or (3) terminate the lease.
Modern Majority- require that the landlord either mitigate damages or terminate the lease.