Proof Flashcards
140 – Civil proceedings: standard of proof
In a civil proceeding, the court must find the case of a party proved if satisfied that the case has been proved on the BALANCE OF PROBABILITIES.
Without limiting the matters that the court may take into account, it must consider:
- the nature of the cause of action or defence; and
- the nature of the subject matter of the proceeding; and
- the gravity of the matters alleged.
141 – Criminal proceedings: standard of proof
The applicable standard of proof is:
- ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ for the prosecution and
- ‘balance of probabilities’ for the defence.
142 – Admissibility of evidence: standard of proof
Court may make findings of fact in relation to a question arising under the EA if satisfied on the BALANCE OF PROBABILITIES, unless another provision specifies otherwise.
When deciding whether to make such a finding of fact, the court must consider the importance of the evidence in the proceeding and the gravity of the matters alleged.
NB: s 142 only applies to deciding questions that arise under the EA. This includes:
- whether the maker of a previous representation is unavailable (s63 - s66);
- whether a person has specialised knowledge based on training, study or experience (s79);
- whether an admission was influenced by violent, oppressive, inhuman or degrading conduct, or threats of such conduct (s84);
- whether it was not reasonable to hold an ID parade, or whether the A refused to take part in an ID parade (s114, s115);
- whether evidence was illegally or improperly obtained (s138).
165 Unreliable evidence
(1) Evidence in a civil proceeding that MAY be UNRELIABLE includes—
- hearsay evidence;
- evidence of an admission;
- ID evidence;
- evidence the reliability of which may be affected by age, ill health (whether physical or mental), injury or the like;
- in a proceeding against the estate of a deceased person—evidence adduced by or on behalf of person seeking relief in the proceeding that is evidence about a matter about which the deceased person could have given evidence if they were alive.
(2) If there is a jury AND a party so requests, the judge is to—
* WARN THE JURY that the evidence may be UNRELIABLE; and
- inform the jury of matters that may cause it to be unreliable; and
- warn the jury of the need for caution in determining whether to accept the evidence and the weight to be given to it.
BUT the judge need not give a warning if there are good reasons for not doing so.