Professional Responsibility Flashcards
Duty of Loyalty
A lawyer has a duty of loyalty to his client that requires the lawyer to put the interest of his client above all other interests and to avoid any conflicts of interest.
Always write this on the exam! Duty to Avoid Conflicts of interest falls within this
Duty to avoid conflicts of interest
A lawyer must avoid all conflicts of interests with his client. Actual conflicts (current); potential (future) conflicts of interest
Concurrent conflict of interest general rule
A lawyer may not represent a client where there is a conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest can arise in several ways: between current client, between current client and another,
Between current clients
A concurrent conflict of interest exists if the representation of one client is directly adverse to another client
Between current client and another
A concurrent conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer’s responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer
Exception to concurrent conflicts of interest
A lawyer may still represent the client despite a concurrent conflict if:
1) the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client without an adverse affect; and
2) the representation is not prohibited by law;
3) the clients are not asserting a claim against each other in the same litigation; and
4) each client gives informed written consent.
California No Risk Limitation
Even if there is no significant risk that lawyer’s representation of the client will be materially limited, a lawyer must still provide written disclosure of the relationship to the client and meet the exception requirements if:
- the lawyer has reason to know or knows that another lawyer in the lawyer’s firm has any kind of relationship to a party or witness; or
- the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that another party’s lawyer is related to lawyer, lives with lawyer, is a client of lawyer or one in his firm, or is in an intimate relationship with the lawyer.
Types of Conflicts of Interest
- Conflict between two clients
- Conflict between a client and a third party
- a conflict between the client and the lawyer’s own personal interests
Conflicts between two or more clients
exists if there is a significant risk that the representation of a client will be materially limited by the lawyer’s loyalty/responsibility to another client or former client
Insurance Conflict (California Rule)
Lawyers are permitted to represent both insurers and insureds when the insurer has the contractual right to unilaterally select counsel for the insured, resulting in no conflict of interest. This inherent conflict is deemed not so, by statute.
Corporate/organizational client
A lawyer employed by an organization or corporation represents the organization/corporation and must act in the best interest of the organization/corporation.
.
When can a lawyer also represent the organization’s constituents?
- A lawyer may also represent the organization and its officers, directors, employees, share-holders, or other constituents if the requirements for the exception to represent those with concurrent conflicts are met
* Always discuss, however, the risk of a duty of confidentiality violation since the lawyer can accidentally disclose information from one client to the other in these situations*
Reporting Misconduct Within a Corporation/Organization to a Higher Authority
If the lawyer knows (or in CA reasonably should know) that:
- an officer employee, or other person associated with the organization is engaged in (or intends to engage in) action that is a violation of a legal obligation or a law reasonably imputable to the organization
and - is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization, the lawyer shall report up, and refer the matter to a higher authority int he organization,
* unless the lawyer reasonably believes that it is not in the best interest of the organization to do so.
Failure to act by higher authority
if the highest authority fails to take action and the lawyer reasonably believes the violation will result in substantial injury to the organization:
- ABA: The lawyer may report out and reveal information, even if confidential, if such disclosure is necessary to prevent injury.
- CA: the lawyer may not report out and disclose information outside the organization if it will violate the duty of confidentiality; rather the lawyer should:
- urge reconsideration of the matter to the higher authorities within the organization,
- resign from representation, or
- withdraw from representation subject to the narrow exception: death/substantial bodily harm - may report out if NECESSARY to prevent a CRIMINAL act likely to result in death or substantial bodily harm
No aggregate settlements or guilty pleas
A lawyer who represents two or more clients shall not participate in making an aggregate settlement of the claims of or against the clients or, in a criminal case, an aggregate agreement as to guilt or pleas, unless each client gives informed written consent
Former government employee
A lawyer who has formerly served as a government employee shall not represent a client in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a government employee unless governmental agency gives informed written consent.
Applies to judges, adjudicative officers, law clerks, arbitrators, mediators, to other third-party neutral persons
Impute disqualification also applies here
Imputed firm disqualification
A conflict for one attorney in a firm is imputed to all other attorneys in the firm, resulting in their disqualification, unless:
1) Conflict is based on a personal interest of the disqualified lawyer and does not present a significant risk of materially limiting the representation by the other firm attorneys; or
2) conflict is based on a former client at a prior firm, the conflicted lawyer is timely screened behind an ethical wall from any participation in the matter, and the former client is provided with written notice and certifications of compliance with the screening procedures, and in California the prohibited lawyer did not substantially participate in the same or substantially related matter
3) a client can waive any imputed disqualification with informed written consent
Lawyer leaves firm
When a lawyer has terminated an association with a firm, the firm may thereafter represent a person with interests materially adverse to those of a client represented by the formerly associated lawyer unless:
1) the matter is substantially the same; and
2) any remaining lawyer has confidential information that is material to the matter
Conflicts between a client and a third party
Exists if there is a significant risk that the representation of a client will be materially limited by the lawyers’ loyalty/responsibility to a third party (ex: third party pays the lawyer’s fees)
Ex: Compensation from third parties:
- Can’t accept unless:
1) client gives informed consent, (CA written consent);
2) there is no interference with the lawyer’s independent professional judgment or with the l-c relationship; and
3) information relating to the representation remains confidential
Conflicts between a client and the lawyer’s personal interest
Exists when there is a significant risk that the representation of a client will be materially limited by the lawyer’s personal interest.
Examples:
- where lawyer has a personal relationship with opposing counsel,
- or deeply held beliefs in opposition to the client, or
- a financial interest adverse to the representation
When can a lawyer’s personal relationship serves as the basis for a conflict of interest?
Can provide the basis for a conflict of interest with a client:
- opposing lawyer is lawyer’s relative, closely related by blood or marriage, they must obtain informed consent before representing clients in the same or substantially related matters
California rule: Extends rule above and requires written disclosures when: 1) one lawyer is the client of the other lawyer; two lawyers cohabitate; two lawyers have a personal intimate relationship
Lawyer’s personal beliefs
The lawyer may still represent the client despite any conflict with his personal beliefs, with full disclosure and informed written consent
Sexual Relations With Client
ABA Rule: A lawyer shall not have sexual relations with a client unless a consensual sexual relationship existed before the lawyer-client relationship commenced
CA: follows ABA rule and clarifies that the above rule does not apply to sexual relations with the lawyer’s spouse or registered domestic partner.
CA defines sexual relations as including sexual intercourse or the touching of an intimate part of another person for the purpose of sexual arousal, gratification, or abuse.
Business Transactions with Clients
A lawyer shall not enter into a business transaction with a client or knowingly acquire an interest adverse to the client unless:
- the terms are fair and reasonable to the client,
- the terms are fully disclosed in writing to the client in an understandable manner (CA: also requires that the lawyer’s role in the transaction be fully disclosed in writing), and
- Client is advised in writing to seek independent counsel (CA: that the client is actually represented by an independent lawyer of the client’s choice), and
- the client gives informed written consent to the essential terms including whether the lawyer is representing the client in the transaction
Solicitation of Gifts
Creates a conflict between the client and the lawyer’s personal interests
- shall not solicit any substantial gift from a client or prepare an instrument that gives the lawyer, or a person related to the lawyer, a gift unless the lawyer/person is related to the client
- California additional exception: a lawyer may accept a gift if the client has been advised by an independent lawyer who has provided a certification of independent review, or if the gift is fair and there is no undue influence
Proprietary Interest
A lawyer shall not acquire a porprietary interest in the cause of action or subject matter of litigation unless:
- acquire a lien to secure the lawyer’s fees, or
- contract with a client for a reasonable contingency fee in a civil case
Financial Assistance/Advances to Clients
Creates a conflict between the client and the lawyer’s personal interest
ABA: A lawyer shall not provide financial assistance to a client in connection with litigation, with the exception of
- Contingency cases: can advance court costs and expenses of litigation in contingency cases, the repayment of which is dependent on the case outcome, or
- Indigent clients: can advance court costs and expenses of litigation
CA: can lend money to the client after employment, for any purposes, if the client promises in writing to repay the loan
Limiting Malpractice Liability
ABA: An attorney may not agree to limit the lawyer’s own liability to the client without advising the client unless client is represented by independent counsel
CA: do not allow a lawyer to prospectively limit liability to a client
Settlement of Legal Malpractice Claims
A lawyer shall not settle a claim or potential claim for malpractice liability with an unrepresented client or former client, unless:
- that person is advised in writing of the desirability of seeking, and
- is given a reasonable opportunity to seek, the advice of independent legal counsel
- (or in CA: if they are in fact represented by independent counsel).
Duty to communicate
The lawyer shall:
1) promptly inform the client of any decision that affects the client’s informed consent
2) Reasonably consult with the client and keep him informed of the status of the case, including any settlement and plea offers, and
3) promptly respond to client communications and reasonable requests for information.
CA: can delay transmission of info if the lawyer reasonably believes that the client would be likely to react in a way that may cause imminent harm to the client or others
Scope of Representation
Lawyer must abide by the client’s substantive decisions (settle, plea, waive jury trial, expenses, testify, appeal) after the lawyer has consulted with the client.
Lawyer is responsible for employing the appropriate legal strategy (motions, discovery, witness or evidence use)
*Always address duty to communicate as well
Duty of Confidentiality
ABA Rule
ABA: A lawyer shall not reveal information relation to the representation of a client except when:
1) client gives informed conset;
2) disclosure is impliedly authorized to represent the client;
3) the lawyer reasonably believes the disclosure is necessary to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm
4) to prevent the client from committing a crime or fraud or to mitigate or rectify a crime or fraud committed by the client that has resulted, or is reasonably certain to result in, substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another and the client is or has used the lawyer’s services to do so
5) to comply with a court order, ethics rule, or statute
6) to secure legal advice about the lawyer’s compliance with ethics rules, or
7) to establish a claim or defense on behalf of the lawyer in a controversy between the lawyer and the client, or in defense of the conduct the client was involved in with the lawyer’s services (defend malpractice, or collect fees)