Professional Responsibility Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Duties to clients

A

(MR 1.1-1.18)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Duties to courts/the legal system

A

(MR 3.1-3.9)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Duties to third parties

A

(MR 4.1-4.4)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Law Firm/Practice Issues

A

(MR 5.1-5.7)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Public Service

A

(MR 6.1-6.5)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Advertising & Solicitation Rules

A

(MR 7.1-7.6)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Integrity of the Profession

A

(MR 8.1-8.5)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Misconduct (4 grounds for discipline)

A

MR and CR 8.4

  1. Violating the rules
  2. Criminal acts that reflect adversely on your honesty, trustworthiness, etc
  3. Engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or reckless or intentional misrepresentation
  4. Engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Liability for actions of subordinate lawyers

A

MR 5.1

Lawyers running firm have a duty for subordinates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Liability of subordinate lawyers

A

5.2

Even subordinate lawyers can be at fault for breaking rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Liability for actions of non-lawyers

A

5.3

Must do best to ensure nonlawyers also follow the rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Malpractice (elements)

A
  1. Lawyer owed a duty to the plaintiff
  2. Lawyer failed to exercise the competence and diligence normally exercised by lawyers in similar circumstances
  3. The breach of duty harmed the plaintiff
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Confidentiality of Information

A
1.6
Lawyer may not reveal information relating to the representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent except:
1. substantial bodily harm
2. prevent financial harm or mitigate it
3. legal advice to comply with rules
4. defense when sued if necessary
5. comply with law
6. detect conflicts but only if the revealed information would not compromise the attorney-client privilege or otherwise prejudice the client.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Tackling Confidentiality Questions

A

First ask: is there confidential client information?
Second ask: is there an exception under 1.6(a)?
Has the client given informed consent to the disclosure?
Is disclosure impliedly authorized as part of the representation?
Third ask: Is there an exception under 1.6(b)?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

California Confidentiality Exception

A

Lawyer reasonably believes the disclosure is necessary to prevent a criminal act that the lawyer reasonably believes is likely to result in death of, or substantial bodily harm to, an individual,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Reporting Misconduct

A

8.3 NO CALIFORNIA VERSION
If you know that another attorney has violated the rules in a way that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, you are required to report them.

17
Q

When are you PERMITTED to disclose

confidential information?

A

Informed consent
Impliedly authorized
Prevent death or serious bodily harm
Prevent future crime/fraud causing substantial financial injury – committed with lawyer’s services
Mitigate past crime/fraud causing substantial financial
injury – committed with lawyer’s services
Secure legal advice about rule compliance
Defend against claims involving the lawyer
Comply with other law/court order
Detect conflicts

18
Q

When are you REQUIRED to disclose confidential information?

A

When disclosure is “necessary to avoid assisting a criminal
or fraudulent act by a client, unless disclosure is prohibited
by Rule 1.6” (MR 4.1; CR 4.1; MR 1.2(d); CR 1.2.1).

If you may, then you must, if necessary to avoid assisting.
NOTE: You may be able to avoid assisting by withdrawing.

19
Q

You MUST withdraw:

A

If continuing to represent the client would require YOU, the
lawyer, to violate the rules or a law.
Rule 1.16: “[A] lawyer shall not represent a client or, where
representation has commenced, shall withdraw from the
representation of a client if . . . the representation will result in
violation of the rules of professional conduct or other law.”
Comment 2: “A lawyer ordinarily must decline or withdraw from
representation if the client demands that the lawyer engage in
conduct that is illegal or violates the Rules of Professional
Conduct or other law.”

20
Q

You MAY withdraw:

A

 If the client is using or has used your services to commit a crime or fraud
Rule 1.16(b)
NOTE: Just because the client has used your services doesn’t
mean you have knowingly assisted in violation of MR 1.2(d).
Relationship to Rule 4.1: 4.1 might require you to disclose, even
if you’re not required to withdraw.

21
Q

Restatement: “[T]he attorney-client privilege may be invoked . . . with respect to:

A

(1) a communication
(2) made between privileged persons
(3) in confidence
(4) for the purpose of obtaining or providing legal
assistance for the client.”

22
Q

Restatement, sec. 69: “Communication”

A

“A communication is any expression through which a
privileged person . . . undertakes to convey information
to another privileged person and any document or other
record revealing such an expression.”
BUT: The privilege does not protect the underlying facts
conveyed, only the communication itself.

23
Q

Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration

of Justice

A

8.4(d)
EXAMPLES:
 A lawyer tipping off the subject of a law enforcement raid
 A lawyer failing to pay a judgment to a client who sued him
 A law school dean who submitted inflated LSAT scores and GPA’s to US News
 A lawyer sexually harassing legal secretary applicants
 President Clinton giving evasive answers in a deposition